Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Grana, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Grana, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cancer
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Quality of Life
Right arrow Sexual Medicine: Female
Right arrow Stress and Coping

Posttraumatic Growth After Breast Cancer: Patient, Partner, and Couple Perspectives

Sharon Manne, PhD, Jamie Ostroff, PhD, Gary Winkel, PhD, Lori Goldstein, MD, Kevin Fox, MD and Generosa Grana, MD

From the Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA (S.M., L.G.); the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.O.); the Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY (G.W.); the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA (K.F.); and Cooper Hospital-Camden, Camden, NJ (G.G.).



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Plot of the interaction between Time x patient emotional expression predicting patient PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for patient emotional expression; {square}, 1 SD above the mean for patient emotional expression.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. A: Plot of the interaction between time by partner positive reappraisal predicting partner PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for positive reappraisal. {square}, 1 SD below the above for positive reappraisal. B: Plot of the interaction between time by partner emotional processing predicting partner PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for partner emotional processing. {square}, 1 SD above the mean for partner emotional processing.

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. A: Plot of the interaction between time by patient physical impairment predicting discrepancy between patient and partner PTGI. Higher scores on the discrepancy measure indicate patient PTGI is higher than partner PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for patient physical impairment. {square}, 1 SD above the mean for patient physical impairment. B: Plot of the interaction between time by partner positive reappraisal predicting discrepancy between patient and partner PTGI. Higher scores on the discrepancy measure indicate patient PTGI is higher than partner PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for partner positive reappraisal. {square}, 1 SD above the mean for partner positive reappraisal. C: Plot of the interaction between time by partner emotional expressiveness predicting discrepancy between patient and partner PTGI. Higher scores on the discrepancy measure indicate patient PTGI is higher than partner PTGI. *, 1 SD below the mean for partner emotional expressiveness. {square}, 1 SD above the mean for partner emotional expressiveness.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Psychosomatic Society