This Article Abstract Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bosch, J. A. Articles by Marucha, P. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bosch, J. A. Articles by Marucha, P. T.

Differential Mobilization of Functionally Distinct Natural Killer Subsets During Acute Psychologic Stress

From the College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illionis (J.A.B., P.T.M.); the School of Dentistry (J.A.B.) and the Department of Psychology (G.G.B.), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; and the Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (J.T.C.).

View larger version (14K): [in a new window]   Figure 1. CD56hi and CD56lo natural killer subsets during the control and task conditions. Dots indicate means; vertical bars indicate standard error of mean. Repeated-measures analysis of variance: **p < .001.

View larger version (13K): [in a new window]   Figure 2. Natural killer subsets, categorized on the basis of CD62L expression, during the control and task conditions. Dots indicate means; vertical bars indicate standard error of mean. Repeated-measures analysis of variance: **p < .001 (all time x condition interactions are statistically significant; see text).

View larger version (10K): [in a new window]   Figure 3. Path model with standardized regression coefficients. Affective response is measured a reactivity on the Profile of Mood States subscales tension–anxiety and anger–hostility. *p < .05, **p < .001.