Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Costanzo, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Costanzo, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health Psychology
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Cancer

Cancer Attributions, Distress, and Health Practices Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors

Erin S. Costanzo, MA, Susan K. Lutgendorf, PhD, Sarah L. Bradley, BS, Stephen L. Rose, MD and Barrie Anderson, MD

From the University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (E.S.C., S.K.L., S.L.B.); and the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.L.R., B.A.).



View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Interaction between attributing cancer to diet and dietary change in predicting anxiety (ß = 0.23, p = .02). High and low points represent scores 1 standard deviation above and below the mean on diet attribution.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Interaction between attributing cancer to an unhealthy lifestyle and dietary change in predicting anxiety (ß = 0.20, p = .048). High and low points represent scores 1 standard deviation above and below the mean on lifestyle attribution.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Interaction between attributing cancer to an unhealthy lifestyle and exercise change in predicting anxiety (ß = 0.25, p = .04). High and low points represent scores 1 standard deviation above and below the mean on lifestyle attribution.

 


View larger version (13K):

[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. Interaction between believing that a healthy lifestyle can prevent cancer recurrence and dietary change in predicting anxiety (ß = 0.30, p = .004). High and low points represent scores 1 standard deviation above and below the mean on the belief that lifestyle can prevent recurrence.

 




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Psychosomatic Society