Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirby, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, R. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Right arrow Therapeutic Interventions

Psychosocial Benefits of Three Formats of a Standardized Behavioral Stress Management Program

Elizabeth D. Kirby, Virginia P. Williams, PhD, Matthew C. Hocking, BA, James D. Lane, PhD and Redford B. Williams, MD

From Williams LifeSkills, Inc. (E.D.K., V.P.W., M.C.H.), Durham, North Carolina; and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.D.L., R.B.W.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.


Figure 12
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Study diagram. *Two participants did not complete 10-day posttraining/wait period evaluation but did return for later evaluations, bringing the total number of participants included in the control group analysis to 38.

 

Figure 22
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Average change on psychosocial measures. {alpha}p < .05 for LifeSkills Workshop plus LifeSkills Video versus control group by time point effect over follow up; ßp < .05 for LifeSkills Video only versus control group by time point effect over follow up; *p < .05 group by time point effect at 10 days; **p < .01 group by time point effect at 10 days; {ddagger}p < .05 group by time point interaction.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Psychosomatic Society