Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Critchley, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Critchley, H. D.
Right arrow Articles by Dolan, R. J.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Behavioral and Neural Effects on Encoding Negative Material

Hugo D. Critchley, DPhil, MRCPsych, Penelope A. Lewis, DPhil, Michael Orth, MD, PhD, Oliver Josephs, PhD, Ralf Deichmann, PhD, Michael R. Trimble, FRCPsych and Raymond J. Dolan, FmedSci

From the Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience (H.D.C., P.A.L., O.J., R.D., R.J.D.) and Raymond Way Unit (M.O., M.R.T.), Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London.


Figure 15
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. (A) The panel illustrates the encoding block design. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was set to a 30 second ‘on’ / 66 second ‘off’ cycle as the patient viewed randomized 1 second presentations of positive, negative, and neutral words (representing discrete non-overlapping events). During the first of three encoding blocks, the patient was scanned using fMRI, signaling the onset of the VNS before scanning by a button press. (B) Across recognition memory blocks performed 20 minutes after each of the three encoding blocks, the patient made significantly more recognition errors to words encoded when the stimulator was active (i.e., in the 30 second ‘on’ period). This effect was almost entirely attributable to interference with the encoding of negative words (which, compared with normative data were relatively enhanced when the stimulator was ‘off’). The bar chart depicts the patient’s recognition memory performance for each word category across all recognition blocks (filled = stimulator ‘on’ at encoding). (C) Activity in a discrete set of brain regions reflected the selective behavioral impact of VNS on the encoding of negative words. VNS enhanced the activity brain stem (pons) ventromedial prefrontal cortex, right anterior insula/lateral orbitofrontal (area 47) cortex, and frontal pole during the processing of negative (but not positive or neutral) words that were subsequently recognized. Interestingly, activity within these regions, particularly area 47 and frontal pole, also predicted subsequent forgetting of words during the first encoding task, illustrated in a conjunction analysis depicted in 2 panels on the right. Significant activity relating to this interaction is plotted on a normalized T2*weighted echoplanar volume from the patient to illustrate fully the field of view. Data are presented at p < .001, uncorrected for clusters of 10 or more contiguous voxels. Peak coordinates and magnitudes of the effects are given in Table 1.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Psychosomatic Society