Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lane, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lip, G. Y. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lane, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lip, G. Y. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary Artery Disease
Right arrow Anxiety
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Quality of Life
Psychosomatic Medicine 63:221-230 (2001)
© 2001 American Psychosomatic Society


SPECIAL ISSUE: COMORBIDITY STUDIES

Mortality and Quality of Life 12 Months After Myocardial Infarction: Effects of Depression and Anxiety

Deirdre Lane, PhD, Douglas Carroll, PhD, FBPsS, CPsychol, Christopher Ring, PhD, AFBPsS, CPsychol, D. Gareth Beevers, MD, FRCP and Gregory Y. H. Lip, MD, FRCP, FACC, FESC

From the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Address reprint requests to: Douglas Carroll, PhD, FBPsS, CPsychol, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Email: carrolld@ bham.ac.uk


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of symptoms of depression and anxiety on mortality and quality of life in patients hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS: The Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were completed by 288 patients hospitalized for MI. Twelve-month survival status was ascertained, and quality of life among survivors was assessed at 12 months using the Dartmouth COOP charts.

RESULTS: Thirty-one (10.8%) patients died, 27 of cardiac causes, during the 12-month follow-up. Symptoms of depression and anxiety predicted neither cardiac nor all-cause mortality. Severity of infarction and evidence of heart failure predicted both cardiac and all-cause mortality. The same findings emerged from supplementary analyses of data from patients who died after discharge from the hospital. Symptoms of depression and anxiety, measured at entry, predicted 12-month quality of life among survivors, as did gender, partner status, employment status, living alone, previous frequency of exercise, and indices of disease severity (Killip class and Peel Index). In a multiple regression model in which all of these variables were entered, initial depression scores provided the best independent prediction of quality of life, although living alone, severity of infarction, and state anxiety also entered the model.

CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms of depression and anxiety did not predict either cardiac or all-cause mortality after MI, but they did predict quality of life among those who lived to 12 months.

Key Words: depression • anxiety • myocardial infarction • quality of life • mortality.

Abbreviations: BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CHD = coronary heart disease; CI = confidence interval; MI = myocardial infarction; OR = odds ratio; STAI = State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Symptoms of depression and anxiety are prevalent in patients with MI (13). Several recent studies have reported that depression and anxiety predict subsequent mortality in MI patients (414). Other prospective studies have suggested that depression may be an antecedent of CHD (1518). Recent reviews of the literature on depression and anxiety and CHD risk (1921) reinforce the view that psychological problems before and after CHD events increase the risk of cardiac and all-cause mortality. One study, conducted among MI patients in Canada (69), revealed that both major depression and elevated BDI scores predicted cardiac mortality 6 months after acute MI independently of the severity of infarction. By the 18-month follow-up, 21 patients had died, 19 (8.6%) of cardiac causes. Again, both major depression and elevated BDI scores were related to cardiac mortality, although only the BDI prediction remained statistically significant when other clinical variables, such as previous MI and evidence of heart failure (Killip class >=2), were controlled (7). In the same study, anxiety also emerged as a predictor of recurrent cardiac events independent of depression (8).

There has been little systematic research on the quality of life of patients after MI (22). However, patients who are depressed after a MI are less likely to return to work (3) or to resume sexual activity (23). In the two studies that specifically examined quality of life in MI survivors, depression emerged as the single best predictor of quality of life, accounting for 49% of the variance, in one study (24), and both anxiety and depression significantly predicted 1-year quality of life in the other (25). In general, depression and anxiety may substantially reduce a person’s quality of life and that of his or her family (26, 27).

The present study examined the relationship between depression and anxiety in the hospital and mortality 12 months after MI. In addition, the study was concerned with the impact of depression and anxiety on the quality of life among survivors.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sample
Patients were recruited from all consecutive admissions to the coronary care units at two general hospitals in the West Midlands, between January 1997 and August 1998, who met established criteria for MI. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee review board at both hospitals. To be diagnosed with MI, a patient had to meet at least two of the following criteria: typical ischemic chest pain lasting at least 20 minutes, presence of new pathological Q waves on the electrocardiogram, a peak creatinine phosphokinase level >1.5 times the normal limit, or a CK-MB (myocardial isoenzyme of creatinine phosphokinase) value >=25 IU/liter or >5% of a simultaneous creatinine phosphokinase value exceeding the normal limit. Patients were excluded from participation in the study if they had a MI as a result of coronary artery bypass graft surgery or angiography, if they had another medical condition likely to lead to death within the next 12 months, if they were unable to speak English, if they were cognitively impaired, or if they were too unstable medically to complete the baseline assessment within 15 days after their infarction. There were no age or gender restrictions.

Overall, 288 (65.9%) of the 437 patients who were eligible for participation provided informed consent and completed the baseline interview ( Figure 1). There were few differences between participants and those who declined to participate, although patients who declined to participate were more likely to be Afro-Caribbean (p < .001), to be nonsmokers (p = .007), and to have diabetes mellitus (p = .002). Those who declined to participate did not have more severe cardiac disease than those who participated, as evidenced by Peel Index scores (a measure of the severity of infarction), Killip class, and length of hospital stay. All patients in the study received routine hospital and postdischarge care.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. In-hospital depression symptom status and survival of participants 12 months after MI.

 
Procedures
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were asked to participate as soon as they were medically stable and had been informed of their diagnosis, on average 6 days after their MI (range, 2–15 days). After explaining the study and obtaining written informed consent, a research psychologist (D.L.) conducted all baseline interviews, which gathered routine demographic data, including age, gender, education, living arrangements, current partner status, ethnicity, and employment status (employed or unemployed). Socioeconomic status was measured by the deprivation scores attached to an individual’s postal code (28). Deprivation scores are composites of the extent of household overcrowding, unemployment, and lack of car and home ownership in small postal code areas across Britain. Scores range from -7.3 to 10.2, with higher positive scores indicating greater deprivation.

Patients also completed a series of questionnaires. The 21-item self-report BDI (29) was used to assess current depressive symptomatology. Scores of 10 or more indicated the presence of depressive symptomatology (69). A meta-analysis of the internal consistency of the BDI revealed a Cronbach’s {alpha} of 0.86 for psychiatric patients and 0.81 for nonpsychiatric patients and test-retest reliability coefficients as high as 0.86 and 0.83, respectively (30). The STAI (31), which comprises two self-report scales, was used to assess both state and trait anxiety. Both scales have acceptable internal consistency, with Cronbach’s {alpha} values of 0.92 and 0.90 for the state and trait scales, respectively. The Health Behaviors Profile, adapted from the Whitehall II study, was used to assess current smoking status; weekly alcohol consumption; and the frequency, intensity, and duration of exercise (32). Patients were asked to rate the frequency of exercise undertaken as follows: three times a week or more, once or twice a week, once to three times a month, or hardly ever. This parameter was scored using a four-point ordinal scale, with higher scores indicating more frequent exercise. These scores were then weighted according to the intensity of exercise; that is, for low, moderate, or vigorous exercise, scores were multiplied by one, two, or three, respectively. Overall scores ranged from 0 to 18. Patients were also asked to indicate the duration of exercise at each intensity, reporting the number of hours per week spent exercising. Duration was weighted for intensity of exercise in the same way as frequency.

Baseline clinical variables, including administration of thrombolytic therapy, history of previous MI, history of hypertension, insulin dependent or non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia (cholesterol >=5.2 mmol/liter), angina pectoris, and other comorbid conditions, were obtained from patients’ hospital records. Prescription of aspirin, ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, statins, and warfarin at discharge was also recorded. The Peel Index (33) was used to gauge the severity of infarction. This index includes important factors covering the immediate prognosis (28 days), namely age, sex, medical history, degree and severity of shock, presence and severity of heart failure, cardiac rhythm, and the nature and extent of electrocardiographic signs. The total score ranges from 1 to 28, with higher scores denoting a poorer prognosis. In addition, Killip class, a standardized four-point clinical assessment of the degree of left ventricular dysfunction, was determined from chest x-ray, heart and lung sounds, and signs of shock (34) by a consulting physician blinded to clinical outcome. The higher the Killip class, the greater the degree of heart failure.

The 12-month survival status of participating patients was established using the patient information system at each hospital. Survival status was determined for all patients 365 days after their MI. Cause of death was established from hospital and general practitioner records and death certificates. Deaths were confirmed as cardiac or noncardiac by a consulting cardiologist blinded to baseline data. Cardiac deaths were classified additionally as secondary to arrhythmia, MI or ischemic heart disease, or heart failure. At 12 months, survivors were sent the COOP chart system to measure their quality of life (35). This system consists of nine charts that assess physical, social, and role functioning; emotional status; overall health; perceived pain; change in health; social support; and perceived quality of life over the previous 4 weeks. Each chart consists of a title, a question, and five response choices, each with a pictorial cue. Each response is scored from 1 to 5; the total score ranges from 9 to 45. Because we were concerned with the relationship between depression and anxiety and quality of life, the COOP chart assessing emotional status, which would be highly influenced by depression and anxiety, was discarded; thus, in this study scores ranged from 8 to 40. High scores denote poor quality of life. The COOP charts have been evaluated on more than 1400 patients sampled from four clinical settings in North America and elsewhere to evaluate their validity, reliability, and acceptability (35). One-hour test-retest correlation coefficients ranged from 0.93 to 0.99, with {kappa} coefficients in the range of 0.80 to 0.97. A test-retest coefficient as high 0.88 was obtained after an interval of 2 weeks (36). The COOP charts are strongly correlated with another well-established measure of quality of life, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item General Health Survey (37).

Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows, version 8.0 (38). All statistical tests were two-tailed; p values <= .05 were considered statistically significant. In comparisons of those with or without elevated BDI scores (BDI score >=10 or <10, respectively), categorical variables were compared using the {chi}2 statistic. Continuity correction was used when there were observed or expected frequencies of <5 in any cell. Continuous variables were compared using independent t tests. The key outcomes were mortality and quality of life 12 months after MI. The mortality analyses were undertaken using logistic regression. All demographic, clinical, and psychological variables that differentiated patients who died by 12 months from those who survived were entered into a multiple logistic regression. Quality-of-life data were analyzed using correlation and multiple linear regression. The demographic, clinical, and psychological variables that were significantly correlated with the quality of life of those surviving to 12 months were included in a multiple linear regression model. In all these analyses, BDI score was treated as both a continuous variable and a dichotomous variable (<10 and >=10). Peel Index scores were also analyzed as both continuous and dichotomous variables, using a <17 and >=17 split for the latter; scores >=17 were considered to signify a mortality risk of at least 50% (33). Given the positively skewed distribution of patients among the four Killip classes, Killip class was reconstituted as a binary variable: class I (no heart failure) and classes II to IV (heart failure). Age was entered at the outset in multiple regression analyses, except in models testing the Peel Index because age contributes to the Peel Index score. Cumulative survival curves for 12-month cardiac mortality, using the Kaplan-Meier method, were constructed for the dichotomized BDI and state anxiety scores (dichotomized as >=40 and <40).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Participant Characteristics
The mean age (SD) of participants was 62.7 (11.5) years (range, 31–89 years). Women made up one-quarter of the sample (N = 73). The majority of participants were white (93.1%), were currently unemployed (67.7%), had a partner (69.8%), and did not live alone (76.7%). The mean deprivation score (SD) and mean years of education (SD) were 3.3 (3.0) and 10.1 (1.7), respectively. Sixty-two (21.6%) participants had suffered a previous MI, 111 (38.7%) were hypertensive, 125 (43.4%) were current cigarette smokers, 208 (77.6%) had hypercholesterolemia on admission, and 172 (59.9%) received thrombolytic therapy. In addition, 146 (52.0%) participants had evidence of heart failure (Killip class >=2), the mean Peel Index score (SD) was 10.4 (5.0), and the mean length of hospital stay (SD) was 10.0 (6.9) days.

Baseline Characteristics as a Function of BDI Status
Tables 1 and 2 show the baseline demographic, clinical, and psychological data for participants who had relatively high levels of depressive symptomatology (BDI scores >=10) and for those with relatively low levels of depressive symptomatology (BDI score <10) during their hospital admission after acute MI. At entry, 89 (30.9%) of the participants scored >=10 on the BDI, indicating mild to severe symptoms of depression. There were several differences between groups: Those with high BDI scores were more likely to be female, to be currently unemployed, to have diabetes mellitus, and to have a longer hospital stay. In addition, patients with high BDI scores also had higher levels of both state and trait anxiety and exercised less frequently than patients with low BDI scores. However, patients with relatively high levels of depressive symptomatology did not seem to have more severe cardiac disease, as evidenced by the Peel Index score and Killip class designation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Demographic and Psychological Data for Participants With and Without Elevated BDI Scores
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Baseline Clinical Data for Participants With and Without Elevated BDI Scores
 
Mortality and Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety
By 12 months after MI, 31 patients (10.8%) had died, 27 of cardiac causes; 16 died of recurrent MI or ischemic heart disease, 8 of heart failure, and 3 of arrhythmia. The causes of the four noncardiac deaths included chronic obstructive airway disease (three) and cerebral hemorrhage (one). Summary demographic, psychological, and baseline clinical data for the patients who died of cardiac causes and those who survived are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Of the 27 patients who died of cardiac causes during the 12-month follow-up, 9 had BDI scores >=10; of the 257 survivors, 78 had BDI scores >=10. Figure 2 shows Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality curves for patients with and without mild to severe symptoms of depression. As can been seen, the cumulative mortality profiles are similar for the two groups.1 Furthermore, as shown in Table 3, the mean BDI scores of survivors and those who died of cardiac causes were not significantly different. Table 3 also makes clear that neither state nor trait anxiety scores at entry differentiated patients who died of cardiac causes from those who survived. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality curves for patients with state anxiety scores >=40 and <40 are presented in Figure 3. Overall, 75 (26.1%) participants had state anxiety scores >=40. When these analyses were repeated for all 31 deaths, similar outcomes emerged. In separate logistic regression analyses, we examined the possibility that depression and gender, given the significant gender difference in BDI scores, had an interactive effect on cardiac mortality. There were no significant interactive associations for either cardiac or all-cause mortality.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Baseline Demographic and Psychological Data of Participants Who Survived to 12 Months Compared With Those Who Died of Cardiac Causes
 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Cumulative 12-month survival of participants with (BDI score >=10) and without (BDI score <10) symptoms of depression.

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cumulative 12-month survival of participants with (state anxiety score >=40) and without (state anxiety score <40) symptoms of anxiety.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Baseline Clinical Data of Participants Who Survived to 12 Months Compared With Those Who Died of Cardiac Causes
 
Seven patients died in the hospital after the baseline interview, six of cardiac causes. To provide direct comparison with a previous study (69), the analyses were repeated for those who died after discharge from the hospital. Symptoms of depression and anxiety still failed to differentiate between survivors and those who died of cardiac (N = 21) or all (N = 24) causes after discharge from the hospital. With regard to the former comparison, for example, the mean (SD) BDI score was 7.0 (7.0) for the 21 postdischarge deaths due to cardiac causes; as Table 3 indicates, the mean (SD) BDI score was 7.7 (6.2) for survivors. Similarly, the 21 patients who died of cardiac causes after discharge had mean (SD) state and trait anxiety scores of 31.8 (13.7) and 30.6 (11.9), respectively, values very similar to those of survivors (see Table 3).

Other Baseline Predictors of Cardiac and All-Cause Mortality
The data in Tables 3 and 4 indicate that partner status and education were associated with cardiac mortality; patients without a partner and those with fewer years of education were more likely to die. The same relationships emerged from the analysis of all-cause mortality. However, neither of these bivariate associations survived adjustment for age. Tables 3 and 4 also show that 12-month cardiac mortality was associated with age, Peel Index score, Killip class, and length of hospital stay. The patients who died of cardiac causes during the 12-month follow-up period were significantly older than those who survived, had significantly higher Peel Index scores, had a poorer Killip class designation, and had a longer hospital stay. The outcomes reported below are for the 27 patients who died of cardiac causes, although similar results emerged in the analysis of all 31 fatalities. In an analysis that included the dichotomized Peel Index, Killip class, and length of hospital stay, both Peel Index score (OR = 3.33, 95% CI = 1.22–9.08, p = .02) and Killip class (OR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.30–4.02, p = .004) emerged as significant predictors of 12-month cardiac mortality. Precisely the same predictors, Peel Index and Killip class, emerged from multiple logistic regression analysis of data from only the patients who died, either of cardiac or all causes, after discharge from the hospital.

Predictors of Quality of Life at 12 Months
Table 5 indicates that baseline BDI score, state and trait anxiety, and frequency of exercise before MI correlated significantly with quality of life measured at 12 months. Reported quality of life was also positively associated with being male, having a partner, not living alone, and being employed. Peel index scores, Killip class, and length of hospital stay were also correlated with quality of life among survivors: the higher the Peel Index score, the worse the Killip class designation, and the longer the hospital stay, the poorer the quality of life. The variables significantly associated with quality of life were entered into a stepwise multiple linear regression model.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Correlation Between Baseline Data and Quality-of-Life Score at 12 Months Among Survivors
 
As shown in Table 6, the baseline BDI score provided the best prediction of quality of life among survivors, although living alone, Peel Index score, and state anxiety also entered the model. The total model accounted for 28% of the variation in quality of life scores at 12 months.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Predictors of 12-Month Quality of Life Among MI Survivorsa
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Symptoms of depression and anxiety measured in the hospital 2 to 15 days after MI did not predict 12-month mortality. This finding is clearly at odds with some (414), although not all (25, 3941), previous research. Because studies have varied in location, patient population, sample size, and the means of measuring depression, some variation in results is hardly surprising. One way in which the present study differed from a previous study that reported positive outcomes (69) was the inclusion of patients who died before discharge from the hospital. However, in supplementary analyses that included only patients who died after discharge, symptoms of depression and anxiety still failed to predict mortality.

Given that a positive relationship between depression, anxiety, and mortality in MI patients has been reported in samples smaller than the present one (69), with fewer fatal cardiac events (613), the current failure to find a relationship is difficult to attribute to low power. Furthermore, a priori power calculations indicate that the present study easily had sufficient power to detect effects at an odds ratio with a magnitude of 3.7 to 7.5, which has been reported in some of the previous studies of depression and anxiety (7, 10, 13). The present study clearly had sufficient power to detect the effects of the severity of infarction and the extent of heart failure on mortality. The striking similarity between the mean BDI and STAI scores of survivors and those who died in the present study strongly suggests that our result is a genuine null and not a positive result waiting to happen with inclusion of more cases. It is important to appreciate that low power has consequences not only for Type II errors but also for Type I errors (42).

It is also difficult to explain our negative results in terms of the prevalence of mild to moderate depressive symptomatology and high levels of state anxiety (STAI >=40) in the current cohort, which, at 31% and 26%, respectively, are identical to those reported by Frasure-Smith et al. (69). With regard to depression, it must be conceded that our failure to clinically assess patients for major depression is undoubtedly a weakness. However, questionnaire measures of depressive symptomatology in MI patients have predicted mortality in other studies (4, 1013), and in the one study that included both questionnaire and clinical assessments, BDI scores and clinical depression status were equally predictive of mortality. Indeed, in this study only the BDI score provided an independent prediction of mortality at 18 months (69).

As evidenced by years in education, the patients in the present study and those described by Frasure-Smith et al. were similar in terms of socioeconomic position (10.1 vs. 10.5 years). The two studies also reported virtually identical 12-month, postdischarge cardiac mortality rates (7.29% vs. 7.21%). However, patients in the present study were slightly older (62.7 vs. 59.6 years). More noticeably, the prevalence of heart failure in the present study at baseline, as evidenced by Killip class, was more than twice that reported by Frasure-Smith et al. (52.0 vs. 21.2%). Accordingly, it is possible that symptoms of depression and anxiety predict mortality mainly in patient groups that are relatively unencumbered by high levels of cardiac morbidity.

When one considers the studies that have reported a positive association between depression, anxiety, and mortality after MI, depression and anxiety would seem to predict mortality primarily in studies that have not controlled for disease severity (13) and in studies in which disease severity is significantly correlated with depression and anxiety (611). As Mendes de Leon (43) emphasized in a recent editorial in Psychosomatic Medicine, "One of the main issues regarding the role of depression is the potential confounding with severity of disease." Although those with higher BDI scores, but not higher STAI scores, in the present study tended to have longer initial hospital stays, neither symptoms of depression nor anxiety were significantly associated with our major cardiological indices of disease severity, the Peel Index and Killip class. In those studies in which symptoms of depression were confounded with disease severity, statistical control for disease severity abolished the effect in the Ladwig et al. study (10, 11) and in the Irvine et al. study (44) but not in the Frasure-Smith et al. studies (69). However, even where an effect remains after statistical correction for potential confounders, caution is still warranted. It may be premature to declare independence on this basis (4547). The ability of multivariate statistical models to determine independence depends on the accuracy of the measurement of the potentially confounding variables; any inaccuracy in the measurement of the potential confounder will inevitably lead to underestimation of its true impact (48). It is worth noting that in another recent study (25) on British MI patients, depression and anxiety were not significantly related to initial measures of cardiac impairment. As in the present study, depression and anxiety were not related to mortality, either at 6 or 18 months. Thus, it remains possible that depression and anxiety are markers of disease severity in some previous studies and that disease severity is the underlying cause of death.

Although mortality will necessarily remain a key outcome in managing cardiovascular disease, cardiology is beginning to embrace other outcomes, in particular quality of life (22). In the present study, depressive symptomatology at entry was powerfully related to later quality of life among survivors, a result in line with the findings of previous research that assessed overall quality of life in this context (24, 25). Although the severity of infarction also predicted 12-month quality of life, so too did two other psychosocial measures, living alone and state anxiety. These results and our broad finding, echoing earlier results (111), that approximately one-third of MI patients reported mild to severe symptoms of depression and/or high levels of anxiety emphasize the need to both assess mood and develop appropriate intervention strategies for those with high levels of depression and anxiety after MI. As a recent editorial asserted, "We should not lose sight of the fact that an intervention that improves well-being, but fails to change survival, is still a very valuable treatment" (22).


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors thank the participating patients and the following cardiologists for providing access to them: Rajai Ahmad, Patrick Cadigan, Teri Millane, Shyam Singh, and Robert Watson.


    NOTES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Dichotomized BDI scores also failed to predict mortality at 6 months (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 0.62–3.58, p = .37). Back

Received for publication February 2, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Forrester AW, Lipsey JR, Teitelbaum ML, DePaulo JR, Andrzejewski PL. Depression following myocardial infarction. Int J Psychiatry Med 1992; 22: 33–46.[Medline]
  2. Crowe JM, Runions J, Ebbsen LS, Oldridge NB, Streiner DL. Anxiety and depression after acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 1996; 25: 98–107.[Medline]
  3. Schleifer SJ, Macarni-Hinson MM, Coyle DA, Slater WR, Kahn M, Gorlin R, Zuckerman HD. The nature and course of depression following myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1785–9.[Abstract]
  4. Ahern DK, Gorkin L, Anderson JL, Tierney C, Hallstrom A, Ewart C, Capone RJ, Schron E, Kornfeld D, Herd JA, Richardson DW, Follick MJ, for the CAPS Investigators. Biobehavioral variables and mortality or cardiac arrest in the Cardiac Arrhythmias Pilot Study (CAPS). Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 59–62.[Medline]
  5. Silverstone PH. Depression increases mortality and morbidity in acute life-threatening medical illness. J Psychosom Res 1990; 34: 651–7.[Medline]
  6. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial infarction: impact on 6-month survival. JAMA 1993; 270: 1819–25.[Abstract]
  7. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Talajic M. Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995; 91: 999–1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Frasure-Smith N, Lespérance F, Talajic M. The impact of negative emotions on prognosis following myocardial infarction: is it more than depression? Health Psychol 1995; 14: 388–98.[Medline]
  9. Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N, Talajic M, Cameron O. Major depression before and after myocardial infarction: its nature and consequences. Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 99-112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ladwig KH, Kieser M, Konig J, Briethardt G, Borggrefe M. Affective disorders and survival after acute myocardial infarction: results from the Post-Infarction Late Potential Study. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 959–64.
  11. Ladwig KH, Lehmacher W, Roth R, Briethardt G, Budde T, Borggrefe M. Factors which provoke post-infarction depression: Results from the Post-Infarction Late Potential Study (PILP). J Psychosom Res 1992; 36: 723–9.[Medline]
  12. Denollet J, Sys SU, Stroobant N, Rombouts H, Gillebert TC, Brutsaert DL. Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet 1996; 347: 417–21.[Medline]
  13. Denollet J, Brutsaert DL. Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with a decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998; 97: 167–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Moser DK, Dracup K. Is anxiety early after myocardial infarction associated with subsequent ischemic and arrhythmic events? Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 395–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Anda R, Williamson D, Jones D, Macera C, Eaker E, Glassman A, Marks J. Depressed affect, hopelessness, and the risk of ischemic heart disease in a cohort of U.S. adults. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 285–94.[Medline]
  16. Arooma A, Raitasalo R, Reunanen A, Impivaara O, Heliövarra M, Knekt P, Lehtinen V, Joukamaa M, Maatela J. Depression and cardiovascular diseases. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1994; 377: 77–82.
  17. Barefoot JC, Schroll M. Symptoms of depression, acute myocardial infarction, and total mortality in a community sample. Circulation 1996; 93: 1976–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wassertheil-Smoller S, Applegate WB, Berge K, Chang CJ, Davis BR, Grimm R Jr, Kostis J, Pressel S, Schron E, for the SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Change in depression as a precursor of cardiovascular events. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 553–61.[Abstract]
  19. Hemingway H, Marmot M. Psychological factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 1999; 318: 1460–7.[Free Full Text]
  20. Kubzansky LD, Kawachi I, Weiss ST, Sparrow D. Anxiety and coronary heart disease: a synthesis of epidemiological, psychological, and experimental evidence. Ann Behav Med 1998; 20: 47–58.[Medline]
  21. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation 1999; 99: 2192–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lespérance F, Frasure-Smith N. The seduction of death [editorial]. Psychosom Med 1999; 61: 18–20.[Free Full Text]
  23. Stern MJ, Pascale L, Ackerman A. Life adjustment postmyocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 1977; 137: 1680–5.[Abstract]
  24. Conn VS, Taylor SG, Wiman P. Anxiety, depression, quality-of-life, and self-care among survivors of myocardial infarction. Issues Ment Health Nurs 1991; 12: 321–31.[Medline]
  25. Mayou RA, Gill D, Thompson DR, Day A, Hicks N, Volmink J, Neil A. Depression and anxiety as predictors of outcomes after myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med 2000; 62: 212–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wells KB, Stewart A, Hays RD, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Daniels M, Berry S, Greenfield S, Ware J. The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 1989; 262: 914–9.[Abstract]
  27. Broadhead WE, Blazer DG, George LK, Tse CK. Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiology survey. JAMA 1990; 264: 2524–8.[Abstract]
  28. Townsend P. Deprivation. J Soc Policy 1987; 16: 125–46.
  29. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–71.
  30. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev 1988; 6: 77–100.
  31. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for adults. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
  32. Marmot MG, Davey-Smith G, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet 1991; 337: 1387–93.[Medline]
  33. Peel AAF, Semple T, Wang I, Lancaster WM, Dall JLG. A coronary prognostic index for grading the severity of infarction. Br Heart J 1962; 24: 745–60.
  34. Killip T III, Kimball JT. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol 1967; 20: 457–64.[Medline]
  35. Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, Kirk JW, Wasson JH, Keller A, Zubkoff M. The COOP function charts: a system to measure patient function in physicians’ offices. In: Lipkin M Jr, editor. Frontiers of primary care: functional status measurement in primary care. Stony Brook (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1990. p. 97–131.
  36. Kinnersley P, Peters T, Stott N. Measuring functional health status in primary care using the COOP-WONCA charts: acceptability, range of scores, construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. Br J Gen Pract 1994; 44: 545–9.[Medline]
  37. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Rachel JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short-and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992; 30 (Suppl 1): 253–65.
  38. Norusis MJ. SPSS for Windows, release 8. 0. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 1998.
  39. Jenkinson CM, Madeley RJ, Mitchell JRA, Turner ID. The influence of psychosocial factors on survival after myocardial infarction. Public Health 1993; 107: 305–17.[Medline]
  40. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI. Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction: a prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1992; 117: 1003–9.
  41. Kuijpers PMJC, Strik J, Honig A, Lousberg R, van den Veen FH, van Praag HM, Wellens HJJ. Depression after a first myocardial infarction has no influence on mortality. Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Psychosomatic Research. Manchester, UK. 1998 Sep.
  42. Oakes MW. Statistical inference: a commentary for the social and behavioural sciences. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1986.
  43. Mendes de Leon CF. Depression and social support in recovery from myocardial infarction: confounding and confusion. Psychosom Med 1999; 61: 738–9.[Free Full Text]
  44. Irvine J, Basinski A, Baker B, Jandciu S, Paquette M, Cairns J, Connolly S, Roberts R, Gent M, Dorian P. Depression and risk of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: testing for the confounding effects of fatigue. Psychosom Med 1999; 61: 729–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Confounding in epidemiological studies: why "independent" effects may not be all they seem. BMJ 1992; 305: 757–9.
  46. Phillips AN, Davey Smith G. How independent are "independent" effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1223–31.[Medline]
  47. Phillips AN, Davey Smith G. Bias in relative odds estimation owing to imprecise measurement of correlated exposures. Stat Med 1992; 11: 953–61.[Medline]
  48. Davey Smith G, Phillips AN. Declaring independence: why we should be cautious. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992; 44: 257–8.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
C. Dickens, L. McGowan, C. Percival, B. Tomenson, L. Cotter, A. Heagerty, and F. Creed
New Onset Depression Following Myocardial Infarction Predicts Cardiac Mortality
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2008; 70(4): 450 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. S. Pedersen, O. R. F. Smith, J. D. Vries, A. Appels, and J. Denollet
Course of Anxiety Symptoms Over an 18-Month Period in Exhausted Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Psychosom Med, April 1, 2008; 70(3): 349 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Thrall, G. Y. H. Lip, D. Carroll, and D. Lane
Depression, Anxiety, and Quality of Life in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1259 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
D. K. Moser
"The Rust of Life": Impact of Anxiety on Cardiac Patients
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2007; 16(4): 361 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. A. Riekert, S. J. Bartlett, M. P. Boyle, J. A. Krishnan, and C. S. Rand
The Association Between Depression, Lung Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Cystic Fibrosis
Chest, July 1, 2007; 132(1): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
B. D. Thombs, G. Magyar-Russell, E. B. Bass, K. J. Stewart, K. K. Tsilidis, D. E. Bush, J. A. Fauerbach, U. D. McCann, and R. C. Ziegelstein
Performance Characteristics of Depression Screening Instruments in Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Review of the Evidence
Psychosomatics, June 1, 2007; 48(3): 185 - 194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
W. A. Shibeshi, Y. Young-Xu, and C. M. Blatt
Anxiety Worsens Prognosis in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2021 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. Dickens, L. McGowan, C. Percival, B. Tomenson, L. Cotter, A. Heagerty, and F. Creed
Depression Is a Risk Factor for Mortality After Myocardial Infarction: Fact or Artifact?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 8, 2007; 49(18): 1834 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A M Yohannes, A Yalfani, P Doherty, and C Bundy
Predictors of drop-out from an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2007; 21(3): 222 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
F. N. Jacka, J. A. Pasco, S. McConnell, L. J. Williams, M. A. Kotowicz, G. C. Nicholson, and M. Berk
Self-Reported Depression and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Community Sample of Women
Psychosomatics, February 1, 2007; 48(1): 54 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Rutledge, V. A. Reis, S. E. Linke, B. H. Greenberg, and P. J. Mills
Depression in Heart Failure: A Meta-Analytic Review of Prevalence, Intervention Effects, and Associations With Clinical Outcomes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1527 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D C Haas
Depression and disability in coronary patients: time to focus on quality of life as an end point
Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 8 - 10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P de Jonge, T A Spijkerman, R H S van den Brink, and J Ormel
Depression after myocardial infarction is a risk factor for declining health related quality of life and increased disability and cardiac complaints at 12 months
Heart, January 1, 2006; 92(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. P. van Melle, P. de Jonge, J. Ormel, H. J.G.M. Crijns, D. J. van Veldhuisen, A. Honig, A. H. Schene, M. P. van den Berg, and for the MIND-IT investigators
Relationship between left ventricular dysfunction and depression following myocardial infarction: data from the MIND-IT
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2005; 26(24): 2650 - 2656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
C. Dickens, L. McGowan, C. Percival, J. Douglas, B. Tomenson, L. Cotter, A. Heagerty, and F. Creed
Association Between Depressive Episode Before First Myocardial Infarction and Worse Cardiac Failure Following Infarction
Psychosomatics, December 1, 2005; 46(6): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
B. L. Rollman, B. H. Belnap, S. Mazumdar, P. R. Houck, F. Zhu, W. Gardner, C. F. Reynolds III, H. C. Schulberg, and M. K. Shear
A Randomized Trial to Improve the Quality of Treatment for Panic and Generalized Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care
Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 62(12): 1332 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
N. R. Benazon, M. M. Mamdani, and J. C. Coyne
Trends in the Prescribing of Antidepressants Following Acute Myocardial Infarction, 1993-2002
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2005; 67(6): 916 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
J. A. Fauerbach, D. E. Bush, B. D. Thombs, U. D. McCann, J. Fogel, and R. C. Ziegelstein
Depression Following Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Prospective Relationship With Ongoing Health and Function
Psychosomatics, August 1, 2005; 46(4): 355 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. C. Matthews, R. A. Nelesen, and J. E. Dimsdale
Depressive Symptoms Are Associated With Increased Systemic Vascular Resistance to Stress
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2005; 67(4): 509 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. Z. Bambauer, O. Aupont, P. H. Stone, S. E. Locke, M. G. Mullan, J. Colagiovanni, and T. J. McLaughlin
The Effect of a Telephone Counseling Intervention on Self-Rated Health of Cardiac Patients
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2005; 67(4): 539 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
N. Frasure-Smith and F. Lesperance
Reflections on Depression as a Cardiac Risk Factor
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2005; 67(Supplement_1): S19 - S25.
[Abstract] [Full