Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lown, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vega, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lown, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vega, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Culture
Right arrow Somatoform
Right arrow Sexual Medicine: Female
Psychosomatic Medicine 63:352-360 (2001)
© 2001 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Intimate Partner Violence and Health: Self-Assessed Health, Chronic Health, and Somatic Symptoms Among Mexican American Women

E. Anne Lown, DrPH and William A. Vega, PhD

From the Alcohol Research Group (E.A.L.), Berkeley, California; and Institute for Quality, Research, and Training (W.A.V.), Robert Wood Johnson Medical School–University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Address reprint requests to: E. Anne Lown, DrPH, 2000 Hearst Ave., Suite 300, Berkeley, CA 94709-2167. Email: ALown{at}arg.org


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: In medical settings intimate partner violence (IPV) has been linked to a variety of health problems. However, few population-based studies have assessed the health of abused women, particularly women from low socioeconomic groups such as Mexican Americans. This study examined the association between recent physical or sexual IPV and self-rated health, chronic health conditions, and somatic symptoms among Mexican American women.

METHODS: Participants were women (N = 1155) with current male partners enrolled in a household survey of 3012 Mexican-origin adults, ages 18 to 59 years, living in urban, town, and rural areas of Fresno County, California. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for four self-assessed health measures, seven chronic diseases, and 32 somatic symptoms.

RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, women reporting previous-year physical or sexual IPV were more likely to report 1) fair/poor overall health (OR, 1.9; confidence interval [CI], 1.0–3.7), physical health (OR, 2.1; CI, 1.2–3.9), and mental health (OR, 3.4; CI, 1.9–6.1), as well as worse comparative health (OR, 4.4; CI, 2.3–8.3); 2) a history of heart problems (OR, 17.0; CI, 4.3–66.7); 3) persistent health problems (OR, 3.3; CI, 1.5–7.0); and 4) numerous somatic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS: Physical or sexual IPV was associated with poorer self-assessed health and many health symptoms among this culturally distinctive Mexican American population.

Key Words: domestic violence • partner abuse • health status.

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; IPV = intimate partner violence; OR = odds ratio.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Physical and sexual abuse of women by their male partners has received increasing attention as a public health problem during the last decade (1) as evidence describing the extent of the problem and its consequences mounts (28). Responding to the perceived high levels of violence in our society, the American Medical Association has made diagnosis and prevention of family violence a priority health issue during the last 4 years (1).

Health problems among abused women are not limited to the acute consequences of abuse but include a variety of long-term health complaints. A significant body of research documents an association between stressful life events and the development of disease (6, 914). Consequences of specific stressful events such as physical and sexual abuse include physical health problems (6, 9, 10, 1522), physical functioning limitations (17, 23, 24), more diagnostic tests and frequent surgeries (9, 2528), and increased healthcare utilization (6, 11, 18, 29).

In addition to health complaints and healthcare services use, self-assessed health indicators have been used to evaluate general health status among abused women. In three previous studies victims of sexual assault rated their health more poorly than did nonvictims (10, 11, 30). Single measures of general health are powerful predictors of morbidity and mortality. People who rate their health as fair or poor have consistently higher rates of mortality (3135), increased bed days, and more physician visits (34). A recent large study found that Hispanic women who rated their general health as fair or poor vs. excellent, very good, or good (adjusting for age) had more than twice the odds of death (OR, 2.2; CI, 1.9–2.6), a higher average number of bed days (23.8 vs.3.3 days), and an average of 11.6 vs. 3.6 physician visits during the previous year (34).

The study reported here addressed three limitations in the current research examining the association between IPV and women’s health status. First, research on medical health and IPV has been conducted primarily in medical settings with notable exceptions (11, 30). Second, the primary population-based studies examining self-assessed health and chronic health problems did so in relation to lifetime sexual assault (10) and lifetime criminal physical and or sexual assault (24). Third, cross-cultural comparisons on the health correlates of partner abuse have not been made using either medically based or population-based samples.

Mexican Americans represent a culturally distinct group from the general US population, and they are the largest Hispanic ethnic group in the United States with a population of about 7.5 million in California (36). The prevalence of IPV among Mexican American women is comparable to the rate for white women, though US-born women report higher rates of abuse than do immigrant women (37). Abused Mexican American women might be expected to have even more serious health problems because of their disproportionate representation among low socioeconomic persons in the United States, a factor that has been associated with health problems in general populations (38). In addition to economic stresses, Mexican-origin women living in the United States often experience social stresses related to their minority status and degree of acculturation. Many Mexican Americans experience a sense of relative deprivation (39) compared with the majority population. This sense of deprivation has also been associated with poorer health and higher mortality compared with other populations (40, 41). Previous research reported that Hispanics are 3.6 times more likely to report fair or poor health compared with whites, even after controlling for illness factors (42). Despite their poorer self-assessed health status, Mexican Americans tend to underutilize healthcare services (43). The combination of IPV, low healthcare utilization, and minority status with its associated economic and social stresses may lead to more serious health problems for Mexican American women compared with abused women in general.

To our knowledge, no study has examined the correlates of sexual or physical abuse by intimate partners in a general population sample. The present study uses a large population sample of culturally distinctive Mexican-origin women to examine the association between recent physical or sexual IPV and self-assessed health status, chronic health conditions, and somatic symptoms.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This analysis used data gathered in 1996 from a multistage, stratified, randomized household survey of 3012 Mexican American men and women, ages 18 to 59 years, living in Fresno County, California. Fresno County is primarily an agricultural region in the heart of the Central Valley of California with one major city, outlying towns, and rural farming areas. Approximately 38% of Fresno County is Hispanic, mostly of Mexican origin. The survey was stratified to represent equal numbers by gender and residence (urban, town, and rural). Response rates were 88% for the urban strata, 91% for town residents, and 92% for the rural strata, with an overall response rate of 90%. Further details on the sampling strategy are described elsewhere (44). The analysis reported here included all female participants with intimate partners (N = 1155).

Data Collection and Measures
Data were collected by trained lay interviewers in participants’ homes using a computer-assisted personal interview system. Human subjects approval was obtained from the University of California. All participants gave informed consent. The interview was available in either English or Spanish and took approximately 1 hour to complete.

Three sets of health indicators were collected: 1) self-assessed health status, 2) chronic health conditions, and 3) somatic symptoms. Health status was measured using four self-assessed health measures. "General health" was measured by asking "In general, would you say your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor?" Responses were dichotomized into "excellent, very good, and good" and "fair or poor." Responses grouped as fair or poor are referred to as poor self-assessed general health. This measure has widely accepted validity (32, 34, 45) and has a demonstrated association with mortality (31, 32, 34, 46). It primarily reflects physical health problems (including physical functioning limitations and chronic and acute conditions) and mental health to a lesser degree (47).

Two additional questions rated physical and mental health: "How would you rate your overall physical health?" and "How would you rate your overall emotional or mental health?" Responses were grouped as above. The physical health question was developed for this survey to differentiate between mental and physical health. The mental health question was adapted from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) (48). Comparative health was assessed by a NCS question modified for use here, ie, "Would you say your overall health is better or worse than other people your age?" "Better" or "same as others" was combined and contrasted with "worse than others."

Chronic health conditions were assessed for seven conditions: respiratory problems, diabetes or high blood sugar, heart attack or other serious heart trouble, high blood pressure or hypertension, arthritis or other severe bone or joint diseases, visual or hearing impairment, and stomach or gall bladder trouble. Responses were coded "yes" for each problem experienced during the previous 12 months. These questions, previously used in the NCS and the Los Angeles Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA-LA) study, were selected for comparability with ECA-LA data examining sexual assault and physical health in a multiethnic population.

Somatic symptoms were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) based on DSM-III-R (49). The CIDI was developed by the World Health Organization and the former US Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration for use in large international psychiatric epidemiologic research. It uses core questions from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule with modifications to make it more appropriate for cross-cultural populations with various levels of literacy and education (50). The CIDI uses a screener for a diagnosis of somatization: "Did you persistently have a lot of physical problems or illnesses over a period of several years?" The 95 women who answered "yes" were asked additional follow-up questions about 32 health symptoms that are used to diagnose somatization disorder (51). Women who had both persistent health problems and a given symptom were scored positive for that somatic symptom. Women with persistent health problems who denied having had a given symptom or women without persistent problems were scored negative for that symptom. A formal diagnosis of somatization was beyond the scope of this assessment.

Physical or sexual IPV by a current male partner during the last 12 months was measured by the following questions, "Has your current spouse/partner ever pushed you, hit you with a fist, used a knife or gun, tried to choke or burn you?" and "Has your current spouse/partner ever forced you to have sex against your will?" These questions were adapted from the Abuse Assessment Screen (52) and the NCS. Those who responded "yes" to either were then asked if such an event had occurred in the previous 12 months. Women who reported either type of abuse in the previous 12 months were considered positive for IPV.

Other independent variables included age, socioeconomic status (measured by the greatest number of years of education attained), and health insurance status (any health insurance (public or private) vs. no health insurance). Age was included because younger women are more likely to report IPV and less likely to have health problems. Education, although not consistently associated with IPV, is associated with self-assessed health (34) and health outcomes. Health insurance status is a measure of access to care and consequently may impact perceived and actual health.

Analysis
All bivariate and logistic regression procedures were first calculated using the statistical software SPSS, version 7.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Weights were applied using SPSS to ensure comparability of the final sample to the actual distribution of county residents by urban, town, and rural residence; by block; and by household size. SUDAAN 6.5 (53) was used to adjust the standard errors for stratified and clustered sampling.

Bivariate frequencies were used to describe the prevalence of IPV and each health condition. Crude ORs, 95% CIs, and p values were determined using logistic regression of one row category and one response. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to describe differences between women reporting and not reporting particular health outcomes. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs are reported.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sample characteristics are described in Table 1. Women had an average of 8.8 years of education, with urban women being slightly more educated than town and rural women (average of 9.1, 8.5, and 8.0 years of education, respectively; p = .005) (not shown). Fifty-six percent of women had either public or private health insurance with no significant differences by residence. Ages ranged from 18 to 57 with a median of 32 years. US-born women constituted nearly 42% of the sample and were significantly more likely to live in the city.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of Mexican American Women in Fresno County, California (N = 1155)a
 
In this sample 10.8% of women reported either physical or sexual abuse by a current partner in the previous 12 months. Sexual abuse by a partner was reported by 4.0% of women and physical abuse by 9.5% of women. Many women reported both types of abuse, with more than two-thirds (68.1%) of sexually abused women also reporting physical abuse but less than a third (28.8%) of physically abused women also reporting sexual abuse.

Self-Assessed Health
In bivariate analyses, two self-assessed health measures indicated significantly worse health among abused women (Table 2). About half of abused women reported poor mental health, compared with about one-quarter of nonabused women. Similarly, 26% of abused women reported health worse than others their age, compared with about 8% of nonabused women. General health and overall physical health were also poorer among abused women, although the differences were not statistically significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Crude and Adjusteda Odds Ratios for Self-Assessed Health Status by Recent Intimate Partner Violenceb Among Mexican American Women
 
When controlling for age, education, and health insurance status, all four self-assessed health measures were poorer in women reporting IPV. Abused women were significantly more likely to report only fair or poor general health (OR, 1.9; CI, 1.0–3.7), physical health (OR, 2.1; CI, 1.2–3.9), and mental health (OR, 3.4; CI, 1.9–6.1). Abused women were also more likely to report having health that was worse than that of others their age (OR, 4.4; CI, 2.3–8.3).

Chronic Health Conditions
In multivariate analysis, only one of seven health conditions was significantly associated with abuse (Table 3). Heart attack or heart problems were more common among women reporting abuse (3.9%) than among women not reporting abuse (0.5%). In multivariate analyses, the odds of reporting heart problems among abused women was 17.0. Abused women were only marginally more likely to report chronic stomach or gall bladder trouble. Although small cell sizes create large confidence intervals, the data imply a much higher odds ratio among those who were abused.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Crude and Adjusteda Odds Ratios for Chronic Health Conditions and Past Year Intimate Partner Violenceb
 
Somatic Symptoms
Women who reported abuse were significantly more likely to report persistent health problems in both bivariate and multivariate analyses (Table 4). In multivariate analyses, women who reported abuse were significantly more likely to report one or more significant somatic symptoms for five of the six symptom groups: gastrointestinal, cardiopulmonary, neurological, sexual, and reproductive. The sixth group, any pain symptoms, was marginally significant (p = .06).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Crude and Adjusteda Odds Ratios for Somatic Symptoms and Intimate Partner Violenceb
 
Some of the strongest measures of association in multivariate analyses are described. Three specific neurological symptoms had particularly high adjusted ORs. Compared with other women in the sample, women with histories of abuse were 12 times more likely to report urinary retention and 9 times more likely to report amnesia or paralysis. In the pain category, "other pain" and pain during urination had high adjusted ORs. Two cardiopulmonary symptoms, shortness of breath and chest pain, were significantly more common in abused women than in nonabused women. Sexual and reproductive symptoms were also significantly higher among abused women, with ORs ranging from 3.4 to 5.9 among abused women.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The key finding of this study was that physical or sexual abuse by a current male partner in the previous 12 months was associated with poorer self-assessed health status, heart attack or heart problems, persistent health problems, and many somatic symptoms. The health problems associated with abuse in this population-based sample are generally consistent with findings from primary care–, specialty care–, and emergency department–based studies as well as other studies of ethnically diverse populations.

Two groups of studies have provided data that describe health problems among women reporting physical or sexual abuse. The first and largest group includes studies carried out in healthcare settings such as internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, and gastrointestinal clinics and emergency departments. These studies have documented 1) the high prevalence of abuse among medical-service seekers (2, 3, 9) and 2) the frequency of abuse histories in women who report certain medical symptoms (6, 9, 17, 21, 27, 54). Abused women in the current sample described types of symptoms similar to those described by abused women in research conducted among primarily white women in medical settings, such as gastrointestinal disorders, pain, shortness of breath, and sexual and reproductive symptoms.

A second group of publications using population-based samples examined health problems and health perceptions in women reporting sexual assault (10, 11, 23, 30, 55, 56) and physical or emotional abuse (19). For example, an analysis of 1610 women from the ECA-LA study reported that assaulted women were only half as likely to report excellent health as women with no history of sexual assault (10). In addition, women who reported sexual assault had higher odds of diabetes, arthritis, and physical disability as well as more somatic symptoms compared with nonassaulted women. In a second example, a meta-analysis of seven general-population studies (N = 10,001) found that sexual assault was associated with poor subjective health regardless of gender, ethnicity, or sample site (30).

Our finding of poor self-assessed general health among abused women is consistent with findings from previous studies on the effects of sexual assault in ethnically diverse populations (10, 11, 30). The importance of poor self-assessed health is highlighted by the strength of this measure in previous research in predicting poor health outcomes. In the present study, abused Mexican American women were more likely to report poor general health and thus may be at greater risk for morbidity and early mortality and may use more health services than nonabused women.

In the NCS, fair or poor self-assessed mental health was associated with almost three times the odds of mental health service use and with higher perceived mental health needs (48). Based on these findings, it is likely that abused women in our sample who were significantly more likely to report poor self-assessed mental health would have higher perceived need and higher mental health service utilization than nonabused women. However, Mexican Americans are known to be low mental health service users (57); thus, increased psychiatric symptomatology (which may benefit from mental health treatment) may not result in increased mental health service use. Barriers to accessing mental health care among women reporting IPV and mental health symptoms would be an important area for future research.

The study reported here found a much stronger association between IPV and "heart attacks or other serious heart trouble" than was apparent in the other ethnically diverse population-based study. Sexually abused women were marginally more likely to report chronic heart disease than nonabused women (adjusted OR, 1.59; p = .06) as well as cardiovascular somatic symptoms (10). Similarly, in a primarily white gastroenterology clinic sample, physically or sexually abused women were more likely to report pain around their hearts (OR,= 2.41; CI, 1.22–4.79) (9). Although this association has been found in two other surveys, the strength of the association in the present sample leads us to believe this symptom may be manifested more strongly among this Mexican American sample.

Complaints of "heart attack" are likely to be a manifestation of distress, including anxiety disorders or ataques de nervios (58), which is a cultural-bound syndrome and an expression of distress described among Puerto Ricans (59). Consistent with this picture, the majority (60%) of physically or sexually abused women reporting heart attacks or heart problems in the present study were below the age of 30, whereas only 20% of nonabused women reporting heart attacks were below this age. Women below age 30 are extremely unlikely to have had an actual heart attack. This hypothesis is consistent with the increased odds among abused women of reporting two cardiopulmonary somatic symptoms: chest pain and shortness of breath, which are commonly associated with anxiety disorders.

Findings on somatic symptoms may be limited because a screener for persistent health problems was used. Only women with self-reported persistent health problems were asked questions about 32 somatic symptoms. Use of this screener may have kept us from capturing the true extent of these health symptoms, which are certain to exist in some women who do not describe themselves as having persistent health problems. As a result, this measure probably conservatively estimates the true association between these symptoms and abuse.

Somatic symptoms were widely reported by abused women in the present study. This is consistent with previous research (6, 9, 10, 12, 17). Replicating the findings of previous population-based (10, 13, 56) and clinic-based studies (21, 60), the current research found that this population of Mexican American abused women reported numerous reproductive symptoms, sexual symptoms (16, 26, 61), and pain (9, 17, 62, 63). Differing from some earlier studies, cardiovascular symptoms and some neurological symptoms (such as urinary retention and amnesia) were reported by the abused Mexican American women in this sample. These complaints may also be characteristic of ataques de nervios. Heart problems, amnesia, and paralysis are common among people reporting ataques de nervios. However, other symptoms common to this syndrome were not significantly more common among abused women, including seizures, fainting, palpitations, and dizziness.

It is possible that symptoms found to be strongly associated with IPV in the present study but not in previous studies are culturally specific manifestations of stress. However, findings would need to be replicated in other studies of Mexican American women to confirm these explanations, and questions would need to assess ataques de nervios directly.

Strengths and Limitations
Given the population-based design of this study, we relied on self-report for chronic medical problems and health symptoms. Some women may have been unaware of certain health problems or misunderstood their diagnoses. However, the health problems described by this population are likely to correspond with presenting complaints in a medical setting, which can form the basis for diagnostic tests and treatment. Recognition of abuse as an underlying contributor to a variety of health conditions may be important in the diagnosis and treatment of women.

Our use of a brief measure to assess abuse may have resulted in an undercount of the actual number of abused women. Repeated questions tend to yield higher prevalence rates for abuse, suggesting that increased trust and behaviorally specific questions make admission of abuse easier (64, 65). Our measure might underestimate the true association between abuse and poor health.

The cross-sectional design of the study does not allow for assessment of temporal order of health and abuse conditions. A history of childhood abuse has been associated with partner abuse as well as later medical problems (9, 66). Although we did not measure (and therefore control for) childhood abuse, the association between partner abuse and a spectrum of medical problem indicators suggests a robust effect for partner abuse. Some of the statistically significant findings may have been due to chance given the multiple comparisons made. Hence, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results, and replication of these findings in other population-based studies is important.

Despite these limitations, IPV was consistently associated with poorer self-assessed health status, chronic heart diseases, and many somatic symptoms in a culturally distinctive Mexican American population. Though the prevalence of abuse in a general population sample of women is significantly lower than that reported in medical settings, it seems that women who report abuse in either setting are likely to report poorer self-assessed health and numerous health complaints. Health complaints among abused Mexican American women seem to be consistent with the complaints of ethnically diverse populations of abused women. However, Mexican American women also may have a culturally specific response to abuse, with a higher likelihood of reporting heart problems and chest pain, amnesia, and paralysis, along with more typical somatic symptoms such as gastrointestinal, neurological, sexual, and reproductive problems.

Abused women clearly suffer a disproportionate burden of disease compared with nonabused women. However, it is unclear whether healthcare utilization by abused Mexican American women in a general population sample is higher than that of their nonabused counterparts. Future studies should examine whether abused women with poorer health are able to access health care.

Increased attention should be paid in medical settings to the identification and prevention of abuse among Mexican American women as well as among other ethnic groups. Knowledge of the association between abuse and certain health complaints can alert healthcare providers to inquire about and address issues related to IPV before considering expensive, invasive, or painful diagnostic tests. Future research might examine medical utilization patterns among a population of abused Mexican American women. Lastly, policy makers should consider the importance of protection for this population, including the provision of culturally appropriate medical and social services, available shelters, and legal services.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The Mexican American Prevalence and Service Survey was supported by Grant MN51192 from the National Institute of Mental Health and DA 12167 from the National Institute of Drug Abuse. Work on this article was made possible by funding from National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Fellowship T32AA07240 and the support of the Alcohol Research Group. We acknowledge the careful reading and thoughtful suggestions on this article from Meredith A. Minkler, PhD, Jacqueline M. Golding, PhD, Lorraine T. Midanik, PhD, Ralph A. Catalano, PhD, and Frederick M. Hecht, MD. We also express our appreciation for statistical assistance and advise about SUDAAN analyses from Bohdan Kolody, PhD.

Received for publication April 17, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. McAfee RE. Physicians and domestic violence: can we make a difference?[editorial]. JAMA 1995; 273: 1790–1.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Abbott J, Johnson R, Koziol-McLain J, Lowenstein S. Domestic violence against women: incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA 1995; 273: 1763–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Dearwater SR, Coben JH, Campbell JC, Nah G, Glass N, McLoughlin E, Bekemeier B. Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. JAMA 1998; 280: 433–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Grisso JA, Schwarz DF, Nirschinger N, Sammel M, Brensinger C, Santanna J, Lowe RA, Anderson E, Shaw LM, Bethel CA, Teeple L. Violent injuries among women in an urban area. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1899–905.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Kyriacou DN, Anglin D, Taliaferro E, Stone S, Tubb T, Linden JA, Muelleman R, Barton E, Kraus JF. Risk factors for injury to women from domestic violence. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1892–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McCauley J, Kern D, Kolodner K, Bill L, Schroeder A, DeChant H, Ryden J, Bass E, Derogatis L. The "battering syndrome": prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 737–46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Sorenson S, Stein J, Siegel J, Golding J, Burnam A. The prevalence of adult sexual assault. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 126: 1154–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Straus M, Smith C. Violence in Hispanic families in the United States: incidence rates and structural interpretations.In: Straus M, Gelles R, editors. Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick (NJ): Transaction Publishers; 1990.p. 341–67.
  9. Drossman DA, Leserman J, Nachman G, Zhiming L, Gluck H, Toomey TC, Mitchell CM. Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 828–33.
  10. Golding JM. Sexual assault history and physical health in randomly selected Los Angeles women. Health Psychol 1994; 13: 130–8.[Medline]
  11. Koss MP, Koss PG, Woodruff J. Deleterious effects of criminal victimization on women’s health and medical utilization. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 342–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Leserman J, Li Z, Hu YJB, Drossman DA. How multiple types of stressors impact on health. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 175–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Rapkin AJ, Kames LD, Darke LL, Stampler FM, Naliboff BS. History of physical and sexual abuse in women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 92–6.[Medline]
  14. Selye H. The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1956.
  15. Cascardi M, Langhinrichsen J, Vivian D. Marital aggression, impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1178–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Golding JM. Part II. The cost of domestic violence to the health care system. Exploratory paper on mental health consequences. San Francisco: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.
  17. Leserman J, Drossman DA, Li Z, Toomey TC, Nachman G, Glogau L. Sexual and physical abuse history in gastroenterology practice: how types of abuse impact health status. Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 4–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Leserman J, Li Z, Drossman DA, Hu YJB. Selected symptoms associated with sexual and physical abuse history among female patients with gastrointestinal disorders: the impact on subsequent health care visits. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 417–25.[Medline]
  19. Ratner P. The incidence of wife abuse and mental health status in abused wives in Edmonton, Alberta. Can J Public Health 1993; 84: 246–9.[Medline]
  20. Walker E, Katon W, Hansom J, Harrop-Griffiths J, Holm L, Jones M, Hickok L, Jemelka R. Medical and psychiatric symptoms in women with childhood sexual abuse. Psychosom Med 1992; 54: 658–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Walling MA, Reiter RC, O’Hara MW, Milburn AK, Lilly G, Vincent SD. Abuse history and chronic pain in women. I. Prevalences of sexual abuse and physical abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 193–9.[Medline]
  22. Walling MK, O’Hara MW, Reiter RC, Milburn AK, Lilly G, Vincent S. Abuse history and chronic pain in women. II. A multivariate analysis of abuse and psychological morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 200–6.[Medline]
  23. Golding J. Sexual assault history and limitations in physical functioning in two general population samples. Res Nurs Health 1996; 19: 33–44.[Medline]
  24. Koss M. Somatic consequences of violence against women. Arch Fam Med 1992; 1: 53–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Arnold R, Rogers D, Cook D. Medical problems of adults who were sexually abused in childhood. BMJ 1990; 300: 705–8.
  26. Chapman J. A longitudinal study of sexuality and gynecologic health in abused women. J Am Osteopath Assoc 1989; 89: 619–24.[Abstract]
  27. Cunningham J, Pearce T, Pearce P. Childhood sexual abuse and medical complaints in adult women. J Interpers Violence 1988; 3: 131–44.
  28. Leserman J, Toomey TC, Drossman DA. Medical consequences of sexual and physical abuse in women. Humane Med 1995; 11: 23–8.
  29. Golding JM, Stein JA, Siegel JM, Burnam MA, Sorenson SB. Sexual assault history and use of health and mental health services. Am J Community Psychol 1988; 16: 625–43.[Medline]
  30. Golding J, Cooper M, George L. Sexual assault history and health perceptions: seven general population studies. Health Psychol 1997; 16: 1–10.
  31. Grant M, Piotrowski Z, Chappell R. Self-reported health and survival in the Longitudinal Study of Aging, 1984–1986. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 375–87.[Medline]
  32. Idler EL, Angel RJ. Self-rated health and mortality in the NHANES-I epidemiologic follow-up study. Am J Public Health 1990; 80: 446–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kaplan GA, Camacho T. Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 117: 292–304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. McGee D, Liao Y, Cao G, Cooper R. Self-reported health status and mortality in a multiethnic US cohort. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 41–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Schoenfeld D, Malmrose LC, Blazer DG, Gold DT, Seeman TE. Self-rated health and mortality in the high-functioning elderly—a closer look at healthy individuals: MacArthur Field Study of Successful Aging. J Gerontol 1994; 49: M109–15.[Abstract]
  36. State of California. Race/ethnic populations estimates: components of change by race. Sacramento: Department of Finance; 1997.
  37. Lown EA, Vega W. Prevalence and predictors of physical partner abuse among Mexican American women. Am J Public Health 2000; 91: 441–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Adler N, Boyce T, Chesney M, Folkman S, Syme L. Socioeconomic inequalities in health. JAMA 1993; 269: 3140–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Rogler LH, Cortes DE, Malgady RG. Acculturation and mental health status among Hispanics. Am Psychol 1991; 46: 585–97.[Medline]
  40. Kaplan G, Pamuk E, Lynch H, Cohen R, Balfour J. Inequality in income and mortality in the United States: analysis of mortality and potential pathways. BMJ 1996; 312: 164–8.
  41. Wilkinson R. National mortality rates: the impact of inequality. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 1082–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Shetterly SM, Baxter J, Mason LD, Hamman RF. Self-rated health among Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic white adults: the San Luis Valley Health and Aging Study. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1798–801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Vega WA, Amaro H. Latino outlook: good health, uncertain prognosis. Annu Rev Public Health 1994; 15: 39–67.[Medline]
  44. Vega W, Kolody B, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alderete E, Catalano R, Caraveo-Anduaga J. Lifetime prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders among urban and rural Mexican Americans in California. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998; 55: 771–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Okun MA, George LK. Physician and self-ratings of health, neuroticism and subjective well-being among men and women. Pers Individual Differences 1984; 5: 533–9.
  46. McCallum J, Shadbolt B, Wang D. Self-rated health and survival: a 7-year follow-up study of Australian elderly. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1100–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Davies AR, Ware JE. Measuring health perceptions in the Health Insurance Experiment. Santa Monica (CA): Rand Corporation; 1981.
  48. Katz S, Kessler R, Frank R, Leaf P, Lin E, Edlund M. The use of outpatient mental health services in the United States and Ontario: the impact of mental morbidity and perceived need for care. Am J Public Health 1997; 87: 1136–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Robins LN, Wing J, Wittchen HU, Helzer JE, Babor TF, Burke J, Farmer A, Jablenski A, Pickens R, Regier DA, Sartorius N, Towle LH. The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: an epidemiologic instrument suitable for use in conjunction with different diagnostic systems and in different cultures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 1060–77.
  50. Wittchen HU, Robins LN, Cottler LB, Sartorius N, Burke JD, Regier D. Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Multicentre WHO/ADAMHA Field Trials. Br J Psychiatry 1991; 159: 645–53, 658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. DSM-III-R. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed revised. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.
  52. McFarlane J, Parker B, Koeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy. JAMA 1992; 267: 3176–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Shah B, Barnwell B, Bieler G. SUDAAN User’s Manual, version 7.0. Research Triangle Park (NC): Research Triangle Institute; 1996.
  54. Walker E, Gelfand A, Gelfand M, Green C, Katon W. Chronic pelvic pain and gynecological symptoms in women with irritable bowel syndrome. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 17: 39–46.[Medline]
  55. Golding J, Taylor D. Sexual assault history and premenstrual distress in two general population samples. J Womens Health 1996; 5: 143–52.
  56. Golding J. Sexual assault history and women’s reproductive and sexual health. Psychol Women Q 1996; 20: 101–21.[Medline]
  57. Wells K, Golding J, Hough R, Burnam M, Karno M. Acculturation and the probability of use of health services by Mexican Americans. Health Serv Res 1989; 24: 237–57.[Medline]
  58. Guarnaccia P, Canino G, Rubio-Stiped M, Bravo M. The prevalence of ataques de nervios in the Puerto Rico Disaster Study. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993; 181: 157–65.[Medline]
  59. Guarnaccia P, Rivera M, Franco F, Neighbors C. The experiences of ataques de nervios: towards an anthropology of emotions in Puerto Rico. Cult Med Psychiatry 1996; 20: 343–67.[Medline]
  60. Lechner M, Vogel M, Garcia-Shelton L, Leichter J, Steibel K. Self-reported medical problems of adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. J Fam Pract 1993; 36: 633–8.[Medline]
  61. Bendixen M, Muus K, Schei B. The impact of child sexual abuse: a study of a random sample of Norwegian students. Child Abuse Negl 1994; 18: 837–47.[Medline]
  62. Saunders D, Hamberger K, Hovey M. Indicators of woman abuse based on a chart review at a family practice center. Arch Fam Med 1993; 2: 337–43.[Free Full Text]
  63. Reiter R, Shakerin L, Gambone J, Milburn A. Correlation between sexual abuse and somatization in women with somatic and nonsomatic chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 104–9.[Medline]
  64. Koss MP. Detecting the scope of rape: a review of prevalence research methods. J Interpers Violence 1993; 8: 198–222.
  65. Russell DEH. Rape in marriage. New York: Macmillan; 1982.
  66. Harrop-Griffiths J, Katon W, Walker E, Holm L, Russo J, Hickok L. The association between chronic pelvic pain, psychiatric diagnoses, and childhood sexual abuse. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 71: 589–93.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
S. Sanchez-Lorente, C. Blasco-Ros, C. L. Coe, and M. Martinez
Recovery of Immune Control Over Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Female Victims of Intimate Partner Violence
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2010; 72(1): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
C. Nicolaidis, B. McFarland, M. Curry, and M. Gerrity
Differences in Physical and Mental Health Symptoms and Mental Health Utilization Associated With Intimate-Partner Violence Versus Childhood Abuse
Psychosomatics, July 1, 2009; 50(4): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Mens HealthHome page
M. Prospero
Mental Health Symptoms Among Male Victims of Partner Violence
American Journal of Men's Health, December 1, 2007; 1(4): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
R. Caetano, S. Ramisetty-Mikler, P. A. Caetano Vaeth, and T. R. Harris
Acculturation Stress, Drinking, and Intimate Partner Violence Among Hispanic Couples in the U.S.
J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2007; 22(11): 1431 - 1447.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
D. Holmes, G. W. Alpers, T. Ismailji, C. Classen, T. Wales, V. Cheasty, A. Miller, and C. Koopman
Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Narratives of Women Abused by Intimate Partners
Violence Against Women, November 1, 2007; 13(11): 1192 - 1205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
I. Ruiz-Perez, J. Plazaola-Castano, and M. del Rio-Lozano
Physical health consequences of intimate partner violence in Spanish women
Eur J Public Health, October 1, 2007; 17(5): 437 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
S. Lipsky and R. Caetano
Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Unmet Need for Mental Health Care: Results From the NSDUH
Psychiatr Serv, June 1, 2007; 58(6): 822 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
J. Klevens
An Overview of Intimate Partner Violence Among Latinos
Violence Against Women, February 1, 2007; 13(2): 111 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
A. C. Denham, P. Y. Frasier, E. G. Hooten, L. Belton, W. Newton, P. Gonzalez, M. Begum, and M. K. Campbell
Intimate Partner Violence Among Latinas in Eastern North Carolina
Violence Against Women, February 1, 2007; 13(2): 123 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
D. J. Whitaker, C. K. Baker, C. Pratt, E. Reed, S. Suri, C. Pavlos, B. J. Nagy, and J. Silverman
A Network Model for Providing Culturally Competent Services for Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence
Violence Against Women, February 1, 2007; 13(2): 190 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PsychosomaticsHome page
A. Interian, L. A. Allen, M. A. Gara, J. I. Escobar, and A. M. Diaz-Martinez
Somatic Complaints in Primary Care: Further Examining the Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15)
Psychosomatics, October 1, 2006; 47(5): 392 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Violence Against WomenHome page
D. Loxton, M. Schofield, R. Hussain, and G. Mishra
History of Domestic Violence and Physical Health in Midlife
Violence Against Women, August 1, 2006; 12(8): 715 - 731.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
M. A. Dutton, B. L. Green, S. I. Kaltman, D. M. Roesch, T. A. Zeffiro, and E. D. Krause
Intimate Partner Violence, PTSD, and Adverse Health Outcomes
J Interpers Violence, July 1, 2006; 21(7): 955 - 968.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. J. Waldinger, M. S. Schulz, A. J. Barsky, and D. K. Ahern
Mapping the Road From Childhood Trauma to Adult Somatization: The Role of Attachment
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 129 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
I. Ruiz-Perez and J. Plazaola-Castano
Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health Consequences in Women Attending Family Practice in Spain
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2005; 67(5): 791 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Interpers ViolenceHome page
S. B. Plichta
Intimate Partner Violence and Physical Health Consequences: Policy and Practice Implications
J Interpers Violence, November 1, 2004; 19(11): 1296 - 1323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. I. Garcia-Linares, S. Sanchez-Lorente, C. L. Coe, and M. Martinez
Intimate Male Partner Violence Impairs Immune Control Over Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Physically and Psychologically Abused Women
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2004; 66(6): 965 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
J. H. Porcerelli, R. Cogan, P. P. West, E. A. Rose, D. Lambrecht, K. E. Wilson, R. K. Severson, and D. Karana
Violent Victimization of Women and Men: Physical and Psychiatric Symptoms
J Am Board Fam Med, January 1, 2003; 16(1): 32 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lown, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vega, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lown, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Vega, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Culture
Right arrow Somatoform
Right arrow Sexual Medicine: Female


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS