Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Northridge, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Northridge, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Blood Pressure
Psychosomatic Medicine 63:711-721 (2001)
© 2001 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Relationship of Depressive Symptoms to Hypertension in a Household Survey in Harlem

Marian Reiff, PhD, Sharon Schwartz, PhD and Mary Northridge, PhD

From the Divisions of Sociomedical Sciences (M.R., M.N.) and Epidemiology (S.S.), Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Address reprint requests to: Marian Reiff, PhD, Rosenthal Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine Research, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons, 600 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032. Email: mr82{at}columbia.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: Two possible explanations for an hypothesized association between depression and hypertension were examined: (1) shared stress-related risk factors are associated with both depression and hypertension and (2) life-style factors associated with depression lead to hypertension.

METHODS: A predominantly black sample of 695 adults were interviewed in the Harlem Household Survey. Two measures of hypertension were used and compared—1) self-report and 2) elevated blood pressure (above 140/90 mm Hg)—on the basis of the mean of two blood pressure measures. Depressive symptoms were measured by use of a 24-item scale based on the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Logistic regression models were used to test associations between hypertension and depressive symptoms, stressors, and life-style factors.

RESULTS: Depressive symptoms were associated with self-reported hypertension but not with elevated blood pressure. The association between self-reported hypertension and depressive symptoms was explained partly by shared stress-related risk factors but not by life-style factors. Several stressors and life-style variables were risk factors for elevated blood pressure independently of depressive symptoms. The findings are consistent with studies that have measured hypertension variously by either self-report or blood pressure. Possible explanations were explored (labeling and help-seeking) but were not supported by the data.

CONCLUSIONS: An association was found between self-reported hypertension and depressive symptoms, which was explained partly by shared stress-related risk factors. Elevated blood pressure was associated with stressors and life-style factors but not with depressive symptomatology. Research on illness representations and cultural dimensions of health suggest avenues for further investigation.

Key Words: hypertension • depression • self-report • blood pressure • stress • African American

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index;; DIS = diagnostic interview schedule;; OR = odds ratio.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A number of studies have examined the association between hypertension and depression. Although most have found support for the existence of an association (eg, those reviewed in Jonas et al. [1], Goldberg et al. [2], MacDonald et al. [3], and Dimsdale [4]), there are also a number of negative reports (57). Several review papers have concluded that the findings remain inconsistent (4, 810). Possible explanations for these inconsistencies include variability in the populations sampled (inpatients, outpatients, and nonpatients) and the measures of depression used (eg, symptom scales, clinical diagnoses, and hospital records.)

Despite these inconsistencies, there are reasons to suggest that depression and hypertension would be comorbid. First, hypertension and depression share a prominent risk factor, which is stress. For example, stressful life events and poverty are associated with both hypertension (4, 11) and depression (1214). Second, some studies suggest that hypertension may be a risk factor for depression or, of central concern here, that depression may be a risk factor for hypertension (1, 7, 1517).

The cross-sectional studies that found an association have been limited in their ability to distinguish among these explanations, given that the temporal ordering is unclear. Some cross-sectional studies have tried to determine whether the depression or hypertension occurred first. Heine et al. (5), for example, studied the effects of past depressive episodes on current hypertension but did not control for hypertension before the depressive episodes.

The few prospective studies that exist define depression as a predictor of hypertension. Jonas et al. (1) followed a sample of 2992 initially normotensive persons for 7 to 16 years and found that the risk of experiencing hypertension was increased among those who had high levels of depressive symptoms at baseline. Another prospective study found no relationship during a one- to three-year follow-up period (2).

In the present study, we examined the association between hypertension and depression in an urban population in which elevated rates of hypertension have been reported (18). We tested the hypothesis that hypertension and depression are related and examined the plausibility of two possible explanations for this association: (1) that hypertension and depression are associated due to shared risk factors, particularly stress, and (2) that depression is a risk factor for hypertension. Because the present study was cross-sectional, temporal order cannot be assessed. However, we explicitly tested mechanisms hypothesized in these explanations. The hypotheses would be supported to the extent that the data are consistent with the mechanisms associated with each hypothesis, as outlined below.


    Stress as a Common Risk Factor
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It is plausible that any association between hypertension and depression is due to some shared risk factors. In addition to sociodemographic variables that have often been examined (eg, ethnicity and socioeconomic status), stress may be an important shared risk factor, because it has been implicated in both depression (12, 14, 1924) and hypertension (2024). Psychosocial and emotional stress is associated with sympathetic nervous system activity, which leads to elevation in blood pressure (25, 26). Although it is generally accepted that acute stress causes a temporary increase in blood pressure, the role of chronic stress on sustained hypertension is more controversial (25, 2730). However, evidence that long-term stress plays an important role in the development and maintenance of hypertension has been found in cross-sectional, case-control, and prospective studies in a variety of populations (31). The hypothesis of a relationship between stress and hypertension has also been supported by findings from ecological studies that high-stress communities (characterized by low education, low occupational status, and elevated rates of marital instability and crime) have excess mortality from hypertension-related diseases (23, 32, 33). The disproportionally high prevalence of hypertension among African Americans in the United States may be partially explained by this association as well as by unexpressed emotions in response to discrimination or other stressful life events (10, 3436). If an association exists between depression and hypertension, it is likely to manifest in Harlem, where many of these community risk factors are evident (reported in the Results section). In the present article, we tested the hypothesis that the relationship between hypertension and depressive symptoms can be explained by stressful life events and chronic strain, adjusting for sociodemographic confounders.


    Depressive Symptoms as a Risk Factor for Hypertension
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Some studies have suggested that depression may be a risk factor for hypertension (1, 19, 21). One possible mechanism for this relationship is that some life-style variables that are risk factors for hypertension, such as obesity, alcohol use, smoking, and lack of physical activity (37, 38), may increase as a result of depression and mediate the relationship between depression and hypertension. Although temporal sequence is not identifiable in our study, to the extent that these mechanisms are supported by the data, the hypothesis that depressive symptoms is causally related to hypertension would also be supported.


    Measurement of Hypertension
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Because hypertension was measured in two different ways, using both self-report and blood pressure, we also examined methodological issues pertaining to the influence of the two different measures of hypertension on our hypotheses. It should be noted that, unlike the other two hypotheses, this was not an a priori hypothesis, this was not an a priori hypothesis but was developed during the course of the analyses. In reviews of the literature, we found 20 studies that measured the association between depression and hypertension using measures of hypertension analogous to self-report (including diagnosed, treated, and aware of hypertensive status). Sixteen studies found a positive association with depression ([1, 2, 1517, 3946]; reviewed in Cottier [8]; [4750]; reviewed in MacDonald et al. [3]), and four studies found no association (6, 7, 51, 52). This contrasts with findings from 10 studies that used blood pressure measures, in which only one found a trend or significant association between depression and hypertension ([1, 5], Craig 1898 in [4]) and seven did not find an association ([2, 6, 17, 5355], in Cottier [8]). Robinson (56) found that patients who consulted a doctor and were diagnosed as hypertensive did not differ in depression scores from those diagnosed as normotensive, but both groups were more depressed than individuals who did not consult a doctor. In these studies, depression was variously measured by use of clinician’s diagnoses, treatment histories, or self-reported depressive symptoms. In a meta-analysis that included 83 studies on blood pressure and personality, Jorgensen et al. (10) found a positive correlation of blood pressure and negative affect when individuals were aware and a negative correlation when they were unaware of their blood pressure levels. We tested our hypotheses using both types of measures (self-report and blood pressure readings).


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Data for this study come from the Harlem Household Survey, which was conducted between 1992 and 1994 in central Harlem, a predominantly African American and Latino community in northern Manhattan. Details of the sampling and survey methods are available elsewhere (57, 58). In brief, respondents were chosen in a two-stage procedure. First, 46 census blocks were randomly selected from the 95 census blocks in the Central Harlem District, and all households in these blocks were enumerated. A sample of 1300 dwellings was randomly selected from the 22,000 enumerated units. Of these, 963 units were inhabited and contained an adult resident at the time of the interview. One adult (age 18–65 years) who spoke English was randomly selected from each household. Of the 963 adults selected, 695 (72%) completed the interview. All interviews were conducted in person by trained community residents using a structured questionnaire and lasted 60 to 90 minutes.

Measures
Dependent variables: hypertension. There were two measures of hypertension; the first based on self-report and the second on blood pressure measurements.

Self-Reported Hypertension. This was measured by asking respondents whether they ever had hypertension or high blood pressure and, if so, whether they had consulted a physician and whether they took antihypertensive medication. They were classified as hypertensive if they said they had high blood pressure. Another self-report measure for hypertension was available ("Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that your blood pressure is high?"). Because the same pattern of results occurred for both definitions, we limited the present article to the first definition of self-reported hypertension.

Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure. These were measured twice during the interview (once halfway through and once at the end) with a mercury sphygmomanometer by trained and certified interviewers. Persons were classified as hypertensive if their mean systolic blood pressure from these two measures was 140 mm Hg or greater, or the mean diastolic blood pressure was 90 mm Hg or greater, or they were currently taking antihypertensive medication. Of the 94 respondents who reported taking antihypertensive medication, 65% (N = 61) had elevated blood pressure. Those classified as hypertensive by this definition included the 35% (N = 33) of those taking medication who did not have elevated blood pressure. Approximately 41% of those with elevated blood pressure were on antihypertensive medication (33% of men and 46% of women [18]).

The relationship between self-report and elevated blood pressure is shown in Table 1. Over one third of the sample (N = 230; 96 men and 134 women) met criteria for hypertension on the basis of elevated blood pressure scores; 22% of respondents (N = 150) self-reported that they had hypertension, and 17% (N = 120) met criteria for both measures (Table 1). Of those with elevated blood pressure, 52% self-reported hypertension (45% of men and 58% of women, p women vs. men = .04) (18).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Relationship Between Self-Reported Hypertension and Elevated Blood Pressurea Measures by Gender
 

Independent variable: depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were measured by use of 24 items from the 7 subscales of the DIS, tapping symptoms of depressed mood, appetite and sleep disturbance, fatigue, restlessness, anhedonia, feelings of worthlessness, cognitive problems, and suicidal ideation. Respondents were asked whether they had experienced each symptom for two weeks or more during the preceding year. Each item was coded 1 if present and 0 if absent. The mean of the items was used as a continuous scale of depressive symptoms. The reliability of the scale was {alpha} = .87. Although this scale is not a standardized measure, it evidenced concurrent validity in that mean depressive symptoms scores were associated in the expected direction with known risk factors for depressive symptoms—ie, gender, marital status, unemployment, income, chronic strains, traumatic events, death of a close friend or relative in past year, smoking, alcohol, drugs, and physical inactivity. These are reported in the Results section.

Shared risk factors of depressive symptoms and hypertension (stressors). Chronic strains were measured as the number of ongoing problems the respondents indicated they had experienced during the preceding year from a list of 10 possible domains (eg, ongoing problems with partner, friends, children, other family, work, money, housing, legal, health of people important to you, and other). One item, relating to problems with own health, was excluded because it was likely to be confounded with hypertension. Scores were based on the total number of strains reported. Current unemployment and experience of homelessness in the respondent’s lifetime were also considered to be chronic strains and were measured as affirmative responses to queries about these experiences.

Traumatic events were measured by two variables. The first was lifetime experience of traumatic events, and scores were based on the number of events indicated out of a list of 20 possible events (including serious accident, large fire, natural disaster, assault, rape, death of a child, spouse or parent [before age 18 years], and separation from parents during childhood). The second measure of trauma was the death of a family member or close friend during the preceding year.

Mediators of depressive symptoms as risk factors for hypertension (life-style factors). Self-reported BMI was calculated by use of self-reported height and weight. Persons were classified as overweight if they had a self-reported BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more (as currently defined by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute).

Smoking status was defined as current if respondents had ever smoked a total of 100 cigarettes or more and reported smoking now and as former if they ever smoked 100 cigarettes or more and were no longer smoking at the time of the interview. Frequent alcohol use was coded positive for those who reported having had five or more drinks per day at least three times per week during the preceding year. Drug use was defined as use at least once per month during the preceding year of any of the following: marijuana, crack, cocaine or heroin, opiates, stimulants, sedatives, PCP, LSD, or inhalants. Physical inactivity was defined as not participating in any physical activities (eg, running, sports, dancing, bicycling, or walking) for at least 15 minutes at a time at least once during the preceding month.

Other potential confounders of a depression-hypertension association. Control variables included age, ethnicity, gender, education, health insurance, annual income, and hypertensive medication (details of measures have been reported elsewhere [18, 57]).

Analytic Approach
Because the hypertension outcomes were dichotomous, logistic regression techniques were used to test the study hypotheses. The predictor variables were introduced in four steps: 1) depressive symptoms, 2) sociodemographic variables (age and gender), 3) stressors, 4) life-style factors (potential mediators), and 5) seeing a physician during the preceding year (a potential confounder). Only variables that were found in preliminary analyses to meet criteria as potential confounders (ie, were associated at least minimally with both depressive symptoms and hypertension) were included in the logistic regression models; ethnicity, education, health insurance, annual income and antihypertensive medication were tested but did not demonstrate an association with both depression and hypertension and were therefore excluded from the regression models. Interaction effects were tested for gender but were not significant.

To the extent that common stressors account for the association between depressive symptoms and hypertension, we would expect the odds ratio for depressive symptoms in step 3 to be smaller than the odds ratio in step 2. To the extent that depressive symptoms are a risk factor for hypertension and the relation is mediated by the variables hypothesized, we would expect that the addition of the hypothesized mediating variables in step 4 would decrease the magnitude of the odds ratio for depressive symptoms below what it was in step 3. These models are not mutually exclusive, and if both hypotheses are supported, it suggests that the two mechanisms can operate simultaneously.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Descriptive Statistics
Sociodemographic characteristics. Details of the sociodemographic characteristics of this sample have been reported elsewhere (57, 58) and are summarized in Table 2. There were 408 women and 287 men in the sample, with a median age of 37 years. The majority of respondents were non-Hispanic blacks. About one third of the sample had not completed high school. Almost half of the respondents had an annual household income of less than $11,000.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Percentage Distribution of Survey Participants by Selected Sociodemographic, Health Care, Stress-related and Life-Style Variables, Harlem Household Survey 1992–1994
 

Potential stressors: traumatic events and chronic strains. People in this sample were exposed to high levels of traumatic events and chronic strains. For example, almost half of the men and 20% of the women reported witnessing someone being seriously injured or violently killed. Over one quarter of the sample (35% of men and 21% of women) reported experiencing a serious physical assault or mugging, and 18% of women reported that they had been raped in their lifetime(57). About one half of the sample was unemployed (46% of men and 55% of women), and one quarter had experienced homelessness at some time in their lives (homelessness was defined as not having a permanent place to live or sleeping in different places, a shelter, or other public place).

Life-style factors (potential mediators of a depression-hypertension relationship). The people in this sample experienced a high level of risks for hypertension. Fifty-eight percent of the sample were overweight, 8% had been frequent alcohol users in the past year, 24% had used drugs, and 31% reported physical inactivity.

Relationships Between Hypertension and Depression
Unadjusted relationships. Tables 3 to 5 show the unadjusted relationships among the dependent and independent variables. Depressive symptomatology followed the expected patterns of association with income (Table 3), chronic strains, unemployment, homelessness, traumatic events (Table 4), smoking, and alcohol and drug use (Table 5). Similarly, self-reported hypertension and hypertension defined by blood pressure were both associated with age, ethnicity, education (Table 2), unemployment (Table 3), smoking, being overweight, and physical inactivity (Table 4). Although self-reported hypertension was associated with gender and visiting a physician in the preceding year, elevated blood pressure was not.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hypertension Measured by Blood Pressure (% Above Cutpoint) and Self-Report (% Positive) and Depressive Symptoms (mean) by Unadjusted Sociodemographic and Health Care Characteristics, Harlem Household Survey 1992–1994
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Hypertension Measured by Blood Pressure (% Above Cutpoint) and Self-Report (% Positive) and Depressive Symptoms (Mean) by Unadjusted Stressor Variables, Harlem Household Survey 1992–1994
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Hypertension Measured by Blood Pressure (% Above Cutpoint) and Self-Report (% Positive) and Depressive Symptoms (Mean) by Unadjusted Lifestyle Factors, Harlem Household Survey 1992–1994
 

Adjusted relationships. The results of the analyses for hypertension measured by blood pressure at interview are presented in Table 6. Parallel analyses for self-reported hypertension are presented in Table 7.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Logistic Regression: Odds Ratios (and Confidence Intervals) for Predictors of Scoring above the Blood Pressure Cutpoint for Hypertension, Harlem Household Survey (N = 695)
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Logistic Regression: Odds Ratios (and Confidence Intervals) for Predictors of Self-Reported Hypertension in Harlem Household Survey (N = 695)
 

Hypertension measured by blood pressure at interview (Table 6). For hypertension measured by blood pressure at interview, there was no association between depressive symptoms and hypertension (in step 1, OR = .95). None of the other variables in the model, sociodemographic characteristics, stressors, or potential mediators (life-style factors) had a substantial influence on that relationship. The stressors (chronic strains, homelessness, unemployment, and the death of a family member or close friend) and the mediators (overweight and physical inactivity) were risk factors for hypertension, but their effect on blood pressure occurred independently of depressive symptoms. Note that those defined as meeting criteria for elevated blood pressure included 33 subjects with hypertension that was under control (reported that they took antihypertensive medication and did not have elevated blood pressure).

Hypertension measured by self-report (Table 7). In contrast to the results for hypertension measured by blood pressure at interview, depressive symptomatology was strongly related to self-reported hypertension. Age and gender were related to both depressive symptoms and hypertension, and both were significant in the model. Adjusting for age increased the OR, because it suppressed the depression/hypertension relationship; adjusting for gender had no effect on the OR.

The shared risk factor hypothesis for the relationship between depressive symptoms and hypertension gained some support from these data. Adjusting for stress decreased the OR between depressive symptoms and self-reported hypertension from 6.07 in step 2 to 4.27 in step 3. Stress made a substantial contribution but did not account for the full association between depressive symptoms and self-reported hypertension, because the adjusted OR was still substantial (4.27, confidence interval 1.67–10.94). Nevertheless, a clear association was demonstrated between stressors and elevated blood pressure. The second hypothesis, that depression acts as a risk factor for hypertension through the elevation of life-style variables that are known risks for hypertension, was not supported by the data. Entering these variables into the logistic regression model had no effect on the OR representing the relationship between depressive symptoms and hypertension.

Measures of Hypertension
An association was demonstrated between depressive symptoms and self-reported hypertension but not with elevated blood pressure. In addition, elevated blood pressure, but not self-reported hypertension, was associated with social stressors (unemployment, homelessness, and death of close friends or family in the past year). Life-style factors were related to hypertension (both measures) but did not act as mediators of the depression-hypertension relationship. The contrasting results for the two measures of hypertension were striking. In order to better understand this finding, we reexamined past studies and reviews ([156], cited in the Introduction). Because our results seem consistent with the literature, we assumed that it was not due solely to peculiarities of our study (eg, measurement error or characteristics of the sample). There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy. Two explanations involve help-seeking behaviors. 1) People with more depression may seek help either for their depression or related somatic symptoms (headaches, stomach aches, etc.). This help-seeking may increase the likelihood that hypertension is diagnosed. 2) It is also possible that a diagnosis of hypertension leads to depression. Several studies have found support for such a labeling effect, where people who screened positive for hypertension subsequently experienced depression as a result (2, 3, 15).

We tested these explanations by adjusting for seeing a physician during the preceding year, having health insurance, seeing a physician for high blood pressure, and accessibility of health care services. Although seeing a physician during the preceding year had a significant effect (p = .02; OR = 2.13), its addition to the self-report hypertension model only reduced the OR for depressive symptoms from 4.44 to 3.95 (Table 7). In our data, therefore, help-seeking and access to health care did not fully explain the relationship between depressive symptoms and self-reported hypertension .

We also divided the sample into four groups: those who neither self-reported nor had high blood pressure; those who self-reported but did not have high blood pressure; those who had high pressure but did not self-report; and those who both self-reported and had high blood pressure. Using a linear regression analysis, we found that the self-reporters and those positive on both measures had significantly higher depressive symptoms scores than those classified as normotensive on both measures, whereas those with only measured high blood pressure did not have more depressive symptoms (adjusting for age, gender, and seeing a physician during the preceding year).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is no definitive explanation for why self-report is associated with depressive symptoms, whereas elevated blood pressure is not. An explanation that was considered was that the measure of hypertension based on blood pressure during the interview may represent a "state" effect, whereas a self-report of hypertension better represents a "trait" effect (lifetime experience of hypertension). However, the measurement of depression is "current," not "lifetime," which would bias against the results. Because blood pressure was measured in respondents’ homes, the occurrence of "white-coat hypertension" is unlikely; nevertheless, some respondents’ blood pressure scores may have been temporarily elevated because of the interview situation. If so, the interview blood pressure scores may not be an accurate measure of hypertension. This limitation has led researchers to advocate the use of ambulatory measures or several readings of blood pressure obtained on two separate days rather than depending on measures during a single interview (10, 30, 36). However, in our study the blood pressure measure has demonstrated validity, because it is related to known risk factors such as overweight, physical inactivity, and stressors (in lifetime and during the preceding year) (see Table 6).

A plausible explanation for the finding that depression is related to self-reported hypertension regardless of measured blood pressure has been found in studies on the construction of illness representations that have examined relationships between self-reported illness and blood pressure (5961). Self-predictions of blood pressure were associated most with reported symptoms, next with reported moods, and none with actual blood pressure (60). Another study suggested that the belief that one is under stress may lead subjects to confirm the presence of a disease by locating symptoms (61). The common sense model of illness helps to explain the discrepancies between the measures of blood pressure and self-report for hypertension and the association between depressive symptoms and self-reported hypertension. An ethnographic study of representative illness models found that, among African American women in New Orleans who were being treated for hypertension, patient illness beliefs differed from biomedical disease classifications. Patients described two folk illness models: "high blood," described as blood rising in the body, caused by diet and heredity, and "high-pertension," believed to be caused by nerves, stress, worry, and anger (62, 63). However, these models fail to explain the independent association of social stressors with elevated blood pressure in our data. It is noteworthy also that Dressler et al. (64) and Dressler and Bindon (65) found associations between hypertension measured by blood pressure and cultural dimensions of socioeconomic status among blacks. Their results suggested that sociocultural dimensions of health can affect the physiological parameter of blood pressure (65).

We should note that there are some limitations to our study. The failure to include non–English-speaking residents limits the generalizablity of the study. A limitation of the study was the use of a nonstandardized depression. However, the scale does demonstrate adequate concurrent validity. The study was cross-sectional, limiting the ability to predict temporal sequence. In addition, BMI was based on self-reported weight and height rather than actual measures of weight and height.

It is clear that, in this study, elevated blood pressure measured at interview was not related to depressive symptoms. However, a clear association was demonstrated between specific social stressors and elevated blood pressure, independent of depression. This finding of a relationship between high blood pressure and social stressors, which are considerable in this community, has important implications and is worthy of further investigation. It is also possible that more precise measures of hypertension would help to determine whether an existing association between depression and sustained hypertension was missed in this study because of poor measures of hypertension. The integration of ethnographic and epidemiological methods, combined with the use of psychological measures, would help to identify what people from diverse cultural backgrounds mean when they self-report hypertension and thereby to determine which aspects of self-reported hypertension may be driving the relationship with depression. Such studies would also help to further investigate the relationship between elevated blood pressure and sociocultural factors.

Received for publication January 20, 2000.

Revision received January 3, 2001.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Stress as a Common...
 Depressive Symptoms as a...
 Measurement of Hypertension
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jonas B, Franks P, Ingram D. Are symptoms of anxiety and depression risk factors for hypertension. Arch Fam Med 1997; 6: 43–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Goldberg E, Comstock G, Graves C. Psychosocial factors and blood pressure. Psychol Med 1980; 10: 243–55.[Medline]
  3. MacDonald L, Sacket D, Haynes R, Taylor D. Labelling in hypertension. A review of the behavioural and psychological consequences. J Chron Dis 1984; 37: 933–42.[Medline]
  4. Dimsdale J. Research at the interface of psychiatry and medicine. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1988; 10: 328–38.[Medline]
  5. Heine B, Sainsbury P, Chynoweth R. Hypertension and emotional disturbance. J Psychiatr Res 1969; 7: 119–30.[Medline]
  6. Wheatly D, Balter M, Levine J, Lipman R, Bauer M, Bonato R. Psychiatric aspects of hypertension. Br J Psychiatry 1975; 127: 327–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Davies S, Ghahramani P, Jackson P, Hippisley-Cox J, Yeo W, Ramsay L. Panic disorder, anxiety, and depression in resistant hypertension-a case-control study. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 1077–82.[Medline]
  8. Cottier C, Perini C, Rauchfleisch U. Personality traits and hypertension: An overview. In: Julius S, Basset DR, editors. Handbook of hypertension. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1987. p. 123–40.
  9. Costa PT, McCrae RR, Andres R, Tobin JD. Hypertension, somatic complaints, and personality. In: Elias MF, Streeten DHP, editors. Hypertension and cognitive processes. Mt. Desert, ME: Beech Hill Publishing; 1980. p. 95–110.
  10. Jorgensen R, Johnson B, Kolodziej ME, Schreer GE. Elevated blood pressure and personality: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull 1996; 120(2): 293–320.[Medline]
  11. Winkelby MA, Jatulis DE, Frank E, Fortmann SP. Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health 1992; 82(6): 816–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dohrenwend BD, Levav I, Shrout P, Schwartz S, Naveh G, Link BL, Skodol A, Steuve A. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science 1992; 255(5047): 946–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dohrenwend B, Dohrenwend BD. Stressful life events. Their nature and effects. New York: Wiley; 1974.
  14. Brown G, Harris T. Social origins of depression: a study of psychiatric disorder in women. New York: Free Press; 1978.
  15. Wood W, Elias M, Schultz N, Pentz CA. Anxiety and depression in young and middle aged hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Exp Aging Res 1979; 5(1): 15–30.[Medline]
  16. Simonseck E, Wallace R, Blazer D, Berkman L. Depressive symptomatology and hypertension-associated morbidity and mortality in older adults. Psychosom Med 1995; 57: 427–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Robbins M, Elias M, Schultz N. The effects of age, blood pressure, and knowledge on hypertensive diagnosis on anxiety and depression. Exp Aging Res 1990; 16(4): 199–207.[Medline]
  18. Diez-Rouz A, Northridge M, Morabia A, Basset M, Shea S. Prevalence and social correlates of cardiovascular disease risk factors in Harlem. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 302–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Glassman AH, Shapiro PA. Depression and the course of coronary artery disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 4–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Boone JL. Stress and hypertension. Primary Care 1991; 18(3): 623–49.[Medline]
  21. James SA. Psychosocial precursors of hypertension: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Circulation 1987; 76 Suppl 1: 60–6.
  22. Walton KG, Pugh ND, Gelderloos P, Macrae P. Stress reduction and preventing hypertension: preliminary support for a psychoneuroendocrine mechanism. J Alternative Complement Med 1995; 1(3): 263–83.[Medline]
  23. Harburg E, Erfurt JC, Chape C, Hauenstein LS, Schull WJ, Schork M. Socioecological stressor areas and black-white blood pressure: Detroit. J Chron Dis 1973; 26: 595–611.[Medline]
  24. Cottington EM, Brock BM, House JS, Hawthorne VM. Psychosocial factors and blood pressure in the Michigan statewide blood pressure survey. Am J Epidemiol 1985; 121: 515–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mustacchi P. Stress and hypertension. West J Med 1990; 153: 180–5.[Medline]
  26. Light KC. Psychosocial precursors of hypertension: experimental evidence. Circulation 1987; 76 (Suppl 1): 67–76.
  27. Beilin L. Stress, coping, lifestyle and hypertension: a paradigm for research, prevention and non-pharmacological management of hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1997; 19: 739–52.
  28. Heine H, Weiss M. Life stress and hypertension. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 45–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Freeman Z. Stress and hypertension—a critical review. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 621–5.[Medline]
  30. Zimmerman R, Frohlich E. Stress and hypertension. J Hypertens 1990; 8 (Suppl 4): 103–7.
  31. Whelton P. Epidemiology of hypertension. Lancet 1994; 344: 101–6.[Medline]
  32. James SA, Kleinbaum DG. Socioecologic stress and hypertension related mortality rates in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 1976; 66: 354–8.[Free Full Text]
  33. Jenkins CD, Tuthill RW, Tannenbaum SI, Kirby C. Social stressors and excess mortality from hypertensive diseases. J Hum Stress 1979; 5: 29–40.
  34. Krieger N, Sidney S. Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA study of young black and white adults. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1370–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Barnes V, Schneider R, Alexander C, Staggers F. Stress, stress reduction, and hypertension in African Americans: an updated review. J Natl Med Assoc 1997; 89: 464–76.[Medline]
  36. Mann SJ. Healing hypertension. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1999.
  37. Markovitz J, Matthews KA, Kannel WB, Cobb JL, D’Agostino RB. Psychological predictors of hypertension in the Framingham Study. JAMA 1993; 270: 2439–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MM, Field L, Francis CK. Predisposing factors for severe uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority population. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 776–81.[Abstract]
  39. Coelho R, Hughes AM, Fernandes Da Fonseca A, Bond MR. Essential hypertension: the relationship of psychological factors to the severity of hypertension. J Psychosom Res 1988; 33: 187–96.
  40. Bloom JR, Monterossa S. Hypertension labeling and sense of well-being. Am J Public Health 1981; 71: 1228–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Bulpitt C, Hoffbrand B, Dollery C. Psychological features of patients with hypertension attending hospital follow-up clinics. J Psychosom Res 1976; 20: 403–10.[Medline]
  42. Bulpitt C, Dollery C, Hoffbrand B. The contribution of psychological features to the symptoms of treated hypertensive patients. Psychol Med 1977; 7: 661–5.[Medline]
  43. Lyketsos G, Arapakis G, Psaras M, Photiou I, Blackburn IM. Psychological characteristics of hypertensive and ulcer patients. J Psychosom Res 1982; 26: 255–62.[Medline]
  44. Sullivan P, Schoentgen S, DeQuattro V, Procci W, Levine D, Van der Meulen J, Bornsheimer J. Anxiety, anger, and neurogenic tone at rest and in stress with primary hypertension. Hypertension 1981; 3 (Suppl 2): 119–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Kidson MA. Personality and hypertension. J Psychosom Res 1973; 17: 35–41.[Medline]
  46. Rabkin JG, Charles E, Kass F. Hypertension and DSM-III depression in psychiatric outpatients. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140: 1072–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Mossey JM. Psychological consequences of labeling in hypertensives. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4: 201–7.[Medline]
  48. Milne BJ, Logan AG, Flanagan PT. Alterations in health perception and lifestyle in created hypertensives. J Chron Dis 1984; 37: 417–23.[Medline]
  49. Soghikan K, Fallick-Hunter EM, Ury HK, Fisher AA. The effect of high blood pressure awareness and treatment on emotional well-being. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4: 191–6.[Medline]
  50. Monk M. Psychologic status and hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 1980; 112: 200–8.[Free Full Text]
  51. Meyer E, Derogatis L, Miller M, Reading A. Hypertension and psychological distress. Psychosomatics 1978; 19: 160–8.[Free Full Text]
  52. Mann AH. Factors affecting the psychological state during one year of a hypertension trial. Clin Invest Med 1981; 4: 197–200.[Medline]
  53. Friedman M, Bennet P. Depression and hypertension. Psychosom Med 1977; 39: 134–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Drummond PD. Personality traits in young males as risk for hypertension. J Psychosom Res 1982; 26: 585–9.[Medline]
  55. Davies M. Blood pressure and personality. J Psychosom Res 1970; 14: 89–104.[Medline]
  56. Robinson J. Symptoms and the discovery of high blood pressure. J Psychosom Res 1969; 13: 157–61.[Medline]
  57. Fullilove R, Fullilove M, Norhtridge M, Basset M, Ganz M, McLean D, Aidala A, Gemson D, Levin B, McCord C. Risk factors of excess mortality in Harlem. Findings from the Harlem Household Survey. Am J Prev Med 1999; 16 (Suppl 3): 22–8.[Medline]
  58. Northridge ME, Morabia A, Ganz ML, Bassett MT, Gemson DH, McCord C. Contribution of smoking to excess mortality in Harlem. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 250–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Meyer D, Leventhal H, Gutman M. Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension. Health Psychol 1985; 4: 115–35.[Medline]
  60. Baumann LJ, Leventhal H. "I can tell when my blood pressure is up, can’t I?" Health Psychol 1985; 4: 203–18.[Medline]
  61. Bauman LJ, Cameron LD, Zimmerman R, Leventhal H. Illness representations and matching labels with symptoms. Health Psychol 1989; 8: 449–69.[Medline]
  62. Heurtin-Roberts S, Reisin E. Folk models of hypertension among Black women: problems in illness management. In: Coreil J, Mull JDeditors., Anthropology and primary health care. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1990. p. 222–50.
  63. Huertin-Robert S. "High-pertension"—the uses of a chronic folk illness for personal adaptation. Soc Sci Med 1993; 3: 285–94.
  64. Dressler WW, Bindon JR, Neggers YH. Culture, socioeconomic status, and coronary heart disease risk factors in an African American Community. J Behav Med 1998; 21: 527–42.[Medline]
  65. Dressler WW, Bindon JR. The health consequences of cultural consonance: cultural dimensions of lifestyle, social support, and arterial blood pressure in an African American Community. Am Anthropol 2000; 102: 244–60.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med SciHome page
I. Hajjar, F. Yang, F. Sorond, R. N. Jones, W. Milberg, L. A. Cupples, and L. A. Lipsitz
A Novel Aging Phenotype of Slow Gait, Impaired Executive Function, and Depressive Symptoms: Relationship to Blood Pressure and Other Cardiovascular Risks
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, June 17, 2009; (2009) glp075v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
B. Rueda and A. M. Perez-Garcia
A Prospective Study of the Effects of Psychological Resources and Depression in Essential Hypertension
J Health Psychol, January 1, 2006; 11(1): 129 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. F. Scherrer, H. Xian, K. K. Bucholz, S. A. Eisen, M. J. Lyons, J. Goldberg, M. Tsuang, and W. R. True
A Twin Study of Depression Symptoms, Hypertension, and Heart Disease in Middle-Aged Men
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2003; 65(4): 548 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
L. H. Powell, A. Hoffman, and L. Shahabi
Socioeconomic Differential in Health and Disease: Let's Take the Next Step
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2001; 63(5): 722 - 723.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reiff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Northridge, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reiff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Northridge, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Blood Pressure


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS