Psychosomatic Medicine Tips for Better Browsing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mailloux, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brener, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mailloux, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brener, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Somatoform
Psychosomatic Medicine 64:353-357 (2002)
© 2002 American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Somatosensory Amplification and Its Relationship to Heartbeat Detection Ability

Jennifer Mailloux, MA and Jasper Brener, PhD

From the Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.

Address reprint requests to: Jennifer Mailloux, The John B. Pierce Laboratory, 290 Congress Ave., New Haven, CT 06519. Email: jmailloux{at}jbpierce.org


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: Somatosensory amplification has been defined as the tendency to experience normal bodily sensations as intense, noxious, and disturbing. The present experiment investigated whether this tendency is due to heightened physiological sensitivity to bodily sensations.

METHODS: The relationship between Somatosensory Amplification Scale (SSAS) scores and objective measures of the ability to detect bodily (ie, heartbeat) sensations derived from the Method of Constant Stimuli procedure was assessed. Although somatosensory amplification characterizes hypochondriacs, the relationship between somatosensory amplification and sensitivity to bodily sensations was examined in nonhypochondriacal, nonpatient participants in an effort to dissociate somatosensory amplification from other variables associated with hypochondriasis and/or patient status.

RESULTS: Heartbeat detectors were found to exhibit significantly lower SSAS scores than nondetectors.

CONCLUSION: This finding suggests that somatosensory amplification is not due to heightened sensitivity to bodily sensations.

Key Words: somatosensory amplification • heartbeat detection • hypochondriasis

Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance;; ECG = electrocardiogram;; MCS = Method of Constant Stimuli;; SSAS = Somatosensory Amplification Scale.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The 10-item SSAS (1–3) has been widely used to study self-reported sensitivity to normal somatic and visceral sensations that may be uncomfortable but are usually not indicative of disease (eg, hunger contractions or being too hot or too cold). Somatosensory amplification has been defined as the tendency to experience normal bodily sensations as intense, noxious, and disturbing (1–3). The present experiment examined whether somatosensory amplification is related to heightened physiological sensitivity to bodily sensations.

Somatosensory amplification has been implicated as a pathogenic mechanism in hypochondriasis (4). The SSAS has been administered to hypochondriacal and nonhypochondriacal individuals in several studies (3, 5–10). In these studies, it was found that hypochondriacal individuals scored significantly higher on the SSAS than nonhypochondriacal individuals. It should be noted, however, that a couple of studies have shown that SSAS scores of hypochondriacal and nonhypochondriacal individuals did not differ (11, 12).

Also, it has been argued that hypochondriasis may be characterized by heightened physiological sensitivity to bodily sensations (4, 13, 14). Therefore, hypochondriacs, who amplify bodily sensations, may do so because they are better able to detect bodily sensations than individuals who do not amplify bodily sensations.

Barsky et al. (5) examined whether individuals who amplify bodily sensations are better able to detect bodily sensations. Somatosensory amplification was measured using the SSAS, and the ability to detect bodily sensations, in particular heartbeat sensations, was measured using the Brener-Kluvitse procedure (15) in medical outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for hypochondriasis and nonhypochondriacal medical outpatients. It seems sensible to have assessed the relationship between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability because hypochondriacs commonly report cardiac symptoms (16, 17).

Barsky et al. (5) found that hypochondriacs scored higher on the SSAS but did not exhibit greater heartbeat detection ability than nonhypochondriacal medical outpatients. Actually, fewer hypochondriacs detected heartbeat sensations than nonhypochondriacal medical outpatients, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Apparently, hypochondriacs are not characterized by heightened physiological sensitivity to bodily sensations. Therefore, heightened physiological sensitivity cannot account for their tendency to amplify bodily sensations.

The present experiment was designed to investigate further the relationship between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability. As in Barsky et al.’s study (5), participants completed the SSAS and performed a heartbeat detection procedure. However, the present experiment differed from Barsky et al.’s experiment in two ways. First, the MCS procedure for assessing heartbeat detection (18) was used instead of the Brener-Kluvitse (15) procedure because the MCS is easier to implement and perform and because its reliability and validity have been thoroughly demonstrated (18–22).

Second, nonhypochondriacal, nonpatient participants were used in the present experiment. Investigating the relationship between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability in nonhypo-chondriacal nonpatients dissociates somatosensory amplification from hypochondriasis as well as variables associated with hypochondriasis and/or patient status. This dissociation allows for a clearer examination of the relationship between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability. Examining this relationship in nonhypochondriacal nonpatients may elucidate the underlying mechanisms of "normal" somatosensory amplification. In turn, whether the underlying mechanisms of "normal" and "abnormal" somatosensory amplification differ may be determined.

In the present experiment, it was hypothesized that individuals who detect heartbeat sensations will score lower on the SSAS than individuals who do not detect heartbeat sensations. Presumably, individuals who detect heartbeat sensations have become familiar with the sensations produced by the normal physiological functioning of their hearts over time and, therefore, their reports of cardiac sensations are accurate. Conversely, individuals who do not detect heartbeat sensations are not familiar with the sensations produced by the normal physiological functioning of their hearts and, therefore, their reports of cardiac sensations are inaccurate. Perhaps hypochondriacs amplify bodily sensations because they are less sensitive rather than more sensitive to bodily sensations. This would be consistent with Barsky et al.’s (5) finding that fewer hypochondriacs, who scored higher on the SSAS than nonhypochondriacal medical patients, detected heartbeat sensations.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Participants
Sixty undergraduates (26 men, 34 women) with a mean age of 21.98 years (SD = 5.71), a mean height of 1.69 m (SD = 0.10), and a mean weight of 68.64 kg (SD = 14.10 kg) received course credit for participating in this experiment.

Apparatus
The SSAS was used to measure somatosensory amplification. The test-retest reliability of the 10-item SSAS and its internal consistency have been demonstrated (3, 23). In the present experiment, the internal consistency of the SSAS was 0.71 (Cronbach’s {alpha}).

During both the familiarization task and the heartbeat detection task of the MCS procedure, participants were seated in a light- and sound-attenuated chamber. The participant’s ECG was recorded using limb electrodes in the standard lead II configuration. Visual stimuli (light flashes presented for 10 ms) were presented during the familiarization task by means of a light-emitting diode (approximately 4 mm in diameter) situated approximately 2 m in front of the participant at eye level. Auditory stimuli (1000-Hz tones presented for 10 ms at 75 dB) were presented during the familiarization task and the heartbeat detection task by means of a piezo oscillator situated approximately 2 m in front of the participant at ear level. A computer was programmed to detect the R wave of the ECG and to present visual and auditory stimuli.

Participants held a response box housing two response buttons. The button on the left was pressed to register a judgment that the tones presented at the prevailing interval were not simultaneous with light flashes (familiarization task) or heartbeat sensations (heartbeat detection task). The button on the right was pressed to register a judgment that the stimuli were simultaneous. The computer was also programmed to register participants’ responses.

Procedure
Participants competed the experiment in a single 1-hour session, during which they completed the SSAS and the familiarization and heartbeat detection tasks of the MCS procedure, in that order.

Somatosensory Amplification Scale.
Participants were asked to rate, using a 5-point ordinal response format, the degree to which the 10 statements are "characteristic of you, in general" or "not characteristic of you, in general."

Familiarization Task.
During this 30-trial task, participants judged the simultaneity of light flashes and tones that were presented at stimulus onset asynchronies of 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 ms. On each trial, participants were presented with five pairs of stimuli at the same stimulus onset asynchrony, which was selected pseudorandomly with the only constraint being that each stimulus onset asynchrony occurred an equal number of times (five) during the task. Participants received the following instructions: "After all five pairs of light flashes and tones have been presented, press the button on the left to indicate that the light flashes and tones were simultaneous or press the button on the right to indicate that the light flashes and tones were not simultaneous." The familiarization task was included to acquaint participants with the procedural demands of the heartbeat detection task.

Heartbeat Detection Task.
On each trial of this 120-trial task, participants were presented with five tones at one of six time delays (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 ms) following the R wave of the ECG. The R-wave-to-tone delay presented on each trial was selected pseudorandomly with the only constraint being that each delay occurred an equal number of times (20) during the task. Participants were asked to concentrate and attempt to sense the beating of their heart and to judge whether they felt the tones were simultaneous with their heartbeat sensations or not. Specifically, participants received the following instructions: "After all five tones have been presented, press the button on the left to indicate that the tones and heartbeat sensations were simultaneous or press the button on the right to indicate that the tones and heartbeat sensations were not simultaneous." Participants were also informed that direct palpation of the pulse was not allowed.

During either the familiarization task or the heartbeat detection task, if a response button was pressed prematurely (before all five light flash and tone pairs or before all five tones were presented), an aversive tone sounded and the trial was repeated. Otherwise, the next trial began after a 5-second intertrial interval.

The MCS procedure is easier to implement and perform than the Brener-Kluvitse procedure (18). The primary difference between the Brener-Kluvitse and MCS procedures is that in the Brener-Kluvitse procedure, participants examine each of the six R-wave-to-tone delays for as long and as often as they like before selecting the one that they believe yields tones that are simultaneous with their heartbeat sensations. It takes approximately 1 hour for participants to make 30 judgments using this procedure. Using the MCS procedure, it takes approximately 1 hour for participants to make 120 judgments. Brener et al. (18) also showed that the MCS procedure yields indices of heartbeat detection ability that are as reliable as those provided by the Brener-Kluvitse procedure. The validity of the MCS procedure was evidenced by the observation that approximately 79% of individuals classified as heartbeat detectors using the MCS procedure were also classified as heartbeat detectors using the Brener-Kluvitse procedure.

Dependent Measures and Data Analysis
Each participants’ ratings (from 1 to 5) of each of the 10 items of the SSAS were averaged to obtain a somatosensory amplification score. On the basis of their performance on the heartbeat detection task, participants were classified as heartbeat detectors if their distribution of simultaneity judgments differed significantly from chance according to chi-square analysis. This {chi}2 analysis was calculated using a 2 x 6 Judgments (simultaneous or nonsimultaneous) by Intervals (0, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 ms) contingency table. A significant deviation from chance indicated that the participant could detect heartbeat sensations (18). ANOVAs were used to determine whether SSAS scores and ratings of each item of the SSAS differed as a function of heartbeat detection ability, and {chi}2 was computed to determine whether heartbeat detection ability differed as a function of gender. An {alpha} level of 0.05 was adopted for all analyses.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An MCS Performance (heartbeat detector, nondetector) by Gender (male, female) ANOVA performed on SSAS scores revealed that SSAS scores were significantly different for heartbeat detectors and nondetectors (F[1, 56] = 4.29, p < .05). Specifically, the SSAS scores of heartbeat detectors (N = 13, M = 2.67) were significantly lower than the SSAS scores of nondetectors (N = 47, M = 3.19). In other words, individuals who can detect their heartbeat sensations amplify bodily sensations less than those who cannot detect their heartbeat sensations. Heartbeat detectors’ mean ratings of every item composing the SSAS were lower than nondetectors’ mean item ratings (see Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Mean (SD) Ratings on Each SSAS Item for Heartbeat Detectors and Nondetectors
 
Separate MCS Performance (heartbeat detector, nondetector) by Gender (male, female) ANOVAs on the ratings of each item of the SSAS indicated that the ratings were significantly lower for heartbeat detectors than nondetectors for the following items: "When someone else coughs, it makes me cough too" (F(1,56) = 5.14, p < .05); "I am quick to sense the hunger contractions in my stomach" (F(1,56) = 6.90, p < .05); and "Even something minor, like an insect bite or a splinter, really bothers me" (F(1,56) = 7.46, p < .05). Interestingly, nondetectors and detectors did not differ on the item "I can sometimes hear my pulse or my heartbeat throbbing in my ear" (F(1,56) = 0.48, p > .05). However, most heartbeat detectors report feeling heartbeat sensations in their chest, so this finding is actually not surprising (24).

The proportion of male heartbeat detectors (N = 9) relative to male nondetectors (N = 17) differed significantly from the proportion of female heartbeat detectors (N = 4) relative to female nondetectors (N = 30) ({chi}2(1,60) = 4.53, p < .05). This indicates that the males in this sample were better able to detect the beating of their hearts than the females in this sample. A nonsignificant main effect of Gender in the MCS Performance by Gender ANOVA on SSAS scores indicated that the somatosensory amplification scores of males (N = 26) and females (N = 34) did not differ (F(1,56) = 2.62, p > .05).


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
Heartbeat detectors’ somatosensory amplification scores were found to be significantly lower than nondetectors’ scores in the present experiment. Perhaps individuals who detect heartbeat sensations recognize sensations that result from normal physiological functioning and therefore do not amplify them. However, individuals who do not detect heartbeat sensations may not recognize sensations that result from normal physiological functioning and therefore may amplify them. Hypochondriacs may belong to the latter group of individuals (5).

Although this interpretation of the inverse relationship found in the present experiment between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability implies that insensitivity to heartbeat sensations causes somatosensory amplification, such a causal relationship cannot be inferred from this study because of the quasi-experimental nature of the design. Furthermore, the present experiment assessed sensitivity to one type of bodily sensation, heartbeat sensations. It may be that although individuals do not detect heartbeat sensations, they do detect other types of bodily sensations, and somatosensory amplification may reflect sensitivity to these other bodily sensations. Future studies might address whether this is true.

Nevertheless, the lack of a positive association between somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability is consistent with studies that have compared hypochondriacal and nonhypochondriacal individuals, the former distinguished from the latter by higher somatosensory amplification scores (1, 3, 5, 6, 8–10), and found no differences in auditory sensitivity (25), tactile sensitivity (9), heat pain thresholds (26, 27), heartbeat tracking (28), and heartbeat detection (5). These findings, to which the results of the present experiment can be added, indicate that heightened physiological sensitivity does not account for the amplification of bodily sensations. A few studies have reported that hypochondriacs have greater visual sensitivity (25), greater heart rate awareness (29), and lower pain tolerance (11) than nonhypochondriacal individuals, suggesting that heightened physiological sensitivity may account for the amplification of bodily sensations. The sources of the disparity between these studies and the others referred to above are not immediately obvious, but the weight of evidence decisively favors the conclusion supported by the present experiment.

Rather than resulting from heightened physiological sensitivity, somatosensory amplification may be the result of a cognitive bias toward the misinterpretation of bodily sensations as indicative of disease. Several studies found that hypochondriacal individuals were more likely than nonhypochondriacal individuals to misinterpret normal bodily sensations as indicative of disease (30–34). A treatment has been developed based on a model of hypochondriasis as a disorder of perception and cognition resulting from somatosensory amplification (35). This treatment focuses on teaching hypochondriacs to attenuate sensory input, because it has been proposed that hypochondriacs are characterized by heightened physiological sensitivity, and to correct attributional errors, because it has been proposed that hypochondriacs misinterpret normal bodily sensations as indicative of disease. In light of the findings of the present experiment, which suggest that heightened physiological sensitivity does not account for the amplification of bodily sensations, teaching hypochondriacs to attenuate sensory input does not seem to be an effective therapeutic component, at least theoretically. Perhaps the efficacy of this particular treatment (36–38) is better attributed to the component that focuses on correcting attributional errors. Future research might address whether this is true.

Consistent with previous research (3, 23, 39), the present experiment found no relationship between gender and somatosensory amplification. However, heartbeat detection ability was related to gender. More male than female heartbeat detectors were identified. Some studies have found gender differences favoring males in heartbeat detection ability (40), whereas other studies have not found gender differences in heartbeat detection ability (18, 21). Although further investigation of gender differences in heartbeat detection ability may be warranted, it should be noted that this is the first occasion on which a gender difference has been found in the authors’ laboratory.

The finding that somatosensory amplification and heartbeat detection ability are not positively related does not diminish the usefulness of the SSAS as a measure of somatosensory amplification. However, it indicates that a better understanding of the construct of somatosensory amplification must be reached. Apparently, somatosensory amplification does not reflect heightened sensitivity to bodily sensations, at least not in the physiological sense.

Received for publication December 7, 2000.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Barsky AJ, Goodson JD, Lane RS, Cleary PD. The amplification of somatic symptoms. Psychosom Med 1998; 50: 510–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Barsky AJ, Wyshak G. Hypochondriasis and somatosensory amplification. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157: 404–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Barsky AJ, Wyshak G, Klerman GL. The somatosensory amplification scale and its relationship to hypochondriasis. J Psychiatr Res 1990; 24: 323–4.[Medline]
  4. Barsky AJ. Amplification, somatization, and the somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics 1992; 33: 28–34.[Free Full Text]
  5. Barsky AJ, Brener J, Coeytaux RR, Cleary PD. Accurate awareness of heartbeat in hypochondriacal and non-hypochondriacal patients. J Psychosom Res 1995; 39: 489–97.[Medline]
  6. Barsky AJ, Cleary PD, Sarnie MK, Klerman GL. The course of transient hypochondriasis. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 484–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Barsky AJ, Fama JM, Bailey ED, Ahern DK. A prospective 4- to 5-year study of DSM-III-R hypochondriasis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 55: 737–44.
  8. Brown HD, Kosslyn SM, Delamater B, Fama J, Barsky AJ. Perceptual and memory biases for health-related information in hypochondriacal individuals. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 67–78.[Medline]
  9. Haenen M, Schmidt AJM, Schoenmakers M, van den Hout MA. Tactual sensitivity in hypochondriasis. Psychother Psychosom 1997; 66: 128–32.[Medline]
  10. Noyes R, Happel RL, Yagla SJ. Correlates of hypochondriasis in a nonclinical population. Psychosomatics 1999; 40: 461–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Gramling SE, Clawson EP, McDonald MK. Perceptual and cognitive abnormality model of hypochondriasis: Amplification and physiological reactivity in women. Psychosom Med 1996; 58: 423–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Speckens AEM, van Hemert AM, Spinhoven P, Bolk JH. The diagnostic and prognostic significance of the Whitely Index, the Illness Attitude Scales and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale. Psychol Med 1996; 26: 1085–90.[Medline]
  13. Barsky AJ. Somatoform disorders.In: Kaplan HI, Sadock BJ, editors. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. 5th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1988.p. 1009–27.
  14. Barsky AJ, Klerman GL. Overview: hypochondriasis, bodily complaints, and somatic styles. Am J Psychiatry 1983; 140: 273–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Brener J, Kluvitse C. Heart beat detection: judgments of the simultaneity of external stimuli and heart beats. Psychophysiology 1988; 25: 554–61.[Medline]
  16. Kenyon FE. Hypochondriasis: a clinical study. Br J Psychiatry 1964; 110: 478–88.
  17. Kenyon FE. Hypochondriacal states. Br J Psychiatry 1976; 129: 1–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Brener J, Liu X, Ring C. A method of constant stimuli for heartbeat detection: comparison with the Brener-Kluvitse and Whitehead methods. Psychophysiology 1993; 30: 657–65.[Medline]
  19. Brener J, Ring C, Liu X. Effects of data limitations on heartbeat detection in the method of constant stimuli. Psychophysiology 1994; 31: 309–12.[Medline]
  20. Knapp K, Ring C, Brener J. Sensitivity to mechanical stimuli and the role of general sensory and perceptual processes in heartbeat detection. Psychophysiology 1997; 34: 467–73.[Medline]
  21. Ring C, Liu X, Brener J. Cardiac stimulus intensity and heartbeat detection: effects of tilt-induced changes in stroke volume. Psychophysiology 1994; 31: 553–64.[Medline]
  22. Schneider TR, Ring C, Katkin ES. A test of the validity of the method of constant stimuli as an index of heartbeat detection. Psychophysiology 1998; 35: 86–9.[Medline]
  23. Speckens AEM, Spinhoven P, Sloekers PPA, Bolk JH, van Hemert AM. A validation study of the Whiteley Index, the Illness Attitude Scales, and the Somatosensory Amplification Scale in general medical and general practice patients. J Psychosom Res 1996; 40: 95–104.[Medline]
  24. Ring C, Brener J. The temporal locations of heartbeat sensations. Psychophysiology 1992; 29: 535–45.[Medline]
  25. Hanback JW, Revelle W. Arousal and perceptual sensitivity in hypochondriacs. J Abnorm Psychol 1978; 87: 523–30.[Medline]
  26. Lautenbacher S, Pauli P, Zaudig M, Birbaumer N. Attentional control of pain perception: the role of hypochondriasis. J Psychosom Res 1998; 44: 251–9.[Medline]
  27. Pauli P, Schwenzer M, Brody S, Rau H, Birbaumer N. Hypochondriacal attitudes, pain sensitivity, and attentional bias. J Psychosom Res 1993; 37: 745–52.[Medline]
  28. Steptoe A, Noll A. The perception of bodily sensations, with special reference to hypochondriasis. Behav Res Ther 1997; 35: 901–10.[Medline]
  29. Tyrer P, Lee I, Alexander J. Awareness of cardiac function in anxious, phobic, and hypochondriacal patients. Psychol Med 1980; 10: 171–4.[Medline]
  30. Barsky AJ, Coeytaux RR, Sarnie MK, Cleary PD. Hypochondriacal patients beliefs about good health. Am J Psychiatry 1993; 150: 1085–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hitchcock PB, Mathews A. Interpretation of bodily sensations in hypochondriasis. Behav Res Ther 1992; 30: 223–34.[Medline]
  32. MacLeod AK, Haynes C, Sensky T. Attributions about common bodily sensations: their associations with hypochondriasis and anxiety. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 225–8.[Medline]
  33. Marcus DK. The cognitive-behavioral model of hypochondriasis: misinformation and triggers. J Psychosom Res 1999; 47: 79–91.[Medline]
  34. Rief W, Hiller W, Margraf J. Cognitive aspects of hypochondriasis and the somatization syndrome. J Abnorm Psychol 1998; 107: 587–95.[Medline]
  35. Barsky AJ, Geringer E, Wool CA. A cognitive-educational treatment for hypochondriasis. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1988; 10: 322–7.[Medline]
  36. Avia MD, Olivares ME, Crespo M, Guisado AB, Sanchez A, Varela A. Educating, the ‘worried well’: description of a structured programme and implications for treatment and prevention. Clin Psychol Psychother 1997; 4: 136–44.
  37. Avia MD, Ruiz MA, Olivares ME, Crespo M, Guisado AB, Sanchez A, Varela A. The meaning of psychological symptoms: effectiveness of a group intervention with hypochondriacal patients. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 23–31.[Medline]
  38. Stern R, Fernandez M. Group cognitive and behavioral treatment for hypochondriasis. Br Med J 1991; 303: 1229–31.
  39. Wyshak G, Barsky AJ, Klerman GL. Comparison of psychiatric screening test in a general medical setting using ROC analysis. Med Care 1991; 29: 775–85.[Medline]
  40. Katkin ES. Blood, sweat, and tears: individual differences in autonomic self-perception. Psychophysiology 1995; 22: 125–37.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. Tracy, N. Goyal, A. Flanders, R. Weening, J. Laskas, P. Natale, and B. Waldron
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Attention to One's Heartbeat
Psychosom Med, November 1, 2007; 69(9): 952 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mailloux, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brener, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mailloux, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brener, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Cardiovascular Medicine
Right arrow Personality
Right arrow Somatoform

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS