Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kivimäki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kevin, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kivimäki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kevin, M. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Stress and Coping
Psychosomatic Medicine 64:817-825 (2002)
© 2002 American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Death or Illness of a Family Member, Violence, Interpersonal Conflict, and Financial Difficulties as Predictors of Sickness Absence: Longitudinal Cohort Study on Psychological and Behavioral Links

Mika Kivimäki, PhD, Jussi Vahtera, MD, Marko Elovainio, PhD, Benita Lillrank, MD and May V. Kevin, MD

From the Department of Psychology, Division of Applied Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (M.K.); Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki (M.K.) and Turku, Finland (J.V.); Department of Social Research, National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland (M.E.); and Department of Public Health, University of Turku, and Turku University Central Hospital, Turku (B.L., M.V.K.), Finland.

Address reprint requests to: Mika Kivimäki, Department of Psychology, Division of Applied Psychology, P.O. Box 13, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. Email: mika.kivimaki{at}occuphealth.fi


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVE: Although an association between stressful life events and health problems has been demonstrated, the underlying mechanisms have remained unclear. We examined whether psychological problems and health-risk behaviors underpin the health effects of different event categories.

METHOD: The initially healthy participants were 2991 (796 men, 2195 women) municipal employees who had taken no sick leave in 1995. In 1997, they completed a questionnaire requesting information on recent life events and psychological and behavioral factors. The outcome was recorded sickness absences in 1998.

RESULTS: In men, the death or serious illness of a family member, violence, and financial difficulties increased the risk of later sickness absence. According to structural equation modeling, violence and financial difficulties also induced psychological problems such as anxiety, mental distress, and lowered sense of coherence. Psychological problems were associated with heightened cigarette and alcohol consumption, which in turn increased sickness absence. A corresponding structural model did not fit the data in relation to death or serious illness of a family member. In women, life events were associated with psychological problems and smoking but not sickness absence.

CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal evidence suggests that increased psychological problems and behaviors involving risk to health partially mediate the effect of stressful life events on health, as indicated by sickness absence. This model received support among men and for the event categories of violence and financial difficulties. Women were less affected by stressful life events than men.

Key Words: life event, • health, • health-risk behaviors, • anxiety, • mental distress, • sense of coherence.

Abbreviations: GFI = goodness-of-fit index;; SRMR = standardized root mean squared residual.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
A large body of research suggests that there is a link between stressful life events and later health problems (1–15). Increased psychological problems, such as prolonged negative emotional states and decreased sense of coherence, as well as health-risk behaviors may be assumed to underlie the link (3, 14, 16), but longitudinal evidence is still scarce.

Stressful life events are a potential source of psychological problems (17, 18). For example, the number of life events in general and of specific events categorized as dangers has been associated with the onset of anxiety (3, 5, 19), and a variety of different stressful events have been associated with increased likelihood of mental distress, as assessed by the General Health Questionnaire (20–22). Major or cumulative life events (eg, violence or sexual abuse) may also cause negative changes in individuals’ sense of coherence (8, 23–25). Feldt and colleagues (26) reported that even moderate stressors (negative changes in leadership at work) predicted a decrease in the employees’ sense of coherence, which, in turn, was associated with a weakening of health. Sense of coherence refers to generalized appraisals of the world, characterized by meaningfulness (ie, demands are interpreted as meaningful and challenges are seen as worthy of being taken up rather than as stressors or threats), manageability (ie, one perceives oneself as having sufficient resources to deal with one’s environment), and comprehensibility (ie, the environment is perceived as structured, predictable. and explicable) (23, 27–29).

Stressful life events have also demonstrated a relationship with health-risk behaviors, such as smoking and alcohol abuse (8, 16, 30). Divorce, being a victim of a crime, and decrease in financial position have been positively associated with heavy drinking in men (31), but the evidence is not consistent for other event categories or life events in general (32, 33). Divorce among women, irrespective of their age or the presence of children, has predicted an increase in alcohol consumption (34, 35).

All the psychological problems and health-risk behaviors reviewed above (ie, anxiety, mental distress, low sense of coherence, smoking, and high alcohol consumption) are well-known predictors of ill health (36–39). Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that these factors are potentially involved in the association between stressful life events and health. Psychological problems may cause direct pathophysiological changes and increase the likelihood of health-risk behaviors (39).


   The Present Study
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we present a model of the role played by psychological and behavioral factors between life events and health (Figure 1). We hypothesize that stressful life events increase the likelihood of illness and contribute to psychological problems. Psychological problems also increase the likelihood of illness, either directly or indirectly through increasing behaviors involving a risk to health.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. The hypothetical model.

 
We tested this model separately for four major event categories (ie, the death or serious illness of a family member, violence, interpersonal conflict, and financial difficulties) because part of the variation in health responses may depend on the type of event (3, 14). Because the etiological significance of a life event can only be demonstrated if it is shown that the event precedes health problems, we measured the subjects’ health before they faced the event. Finally, this study explored sex differences. Prior research has shown a significant interaction between sex and stressful life events in predicting health (40, 41), and it has been proposed (14) that the intervening mechanisms also vary between women and men.


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Study Population
The sampling procedure used in this study is shown in Figure 2. Data were drawn from the ongoing Finnish 8-Town Study, a longitudinal study exploring the relationships between psychosocial factors and health. In 1997, 6442 identifiable full-time permanent municipal employees responded to a questionnaire designed to assess stressful life events and psychological and behavioral factors. The respondents represented 67% of a random sample from the personnel of the eight towns. From the respondents, we selected all those employees who had no medically certified sick leave in 1995, although they had been at the service of the towns in that year and at least 11 months per year in 1997 and 1998. This final cohort of the initially healthy participants comprised 796 (27%) men and 2195 (73%) women.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. Flow chart of the sample selection procedure.

 
Study Design
None of the participants had sickness absence at baseline in 1995. In November 1997, stressful life events during the preceding 12 months and psychological and behavioral factors were measured using an identifiable questionnaire. The number of sickness absence days in 1998 was the outcome.

Stressful Life Events
The measure of weighted life events was based on the list of 13 negative life events derived from those used in earlier studies (42, 43). For each event, we asked the point of time for occurrence with a response format including the categories during the preceding 12 months, earlier, never and the severity of the event with the response categories 1 = not so burdensome, 2 = burdensome, 3 = extremely burdensome. Only events during the preceding 12 months were considered in this study.

Weights were squared means of severity ratings calculated for each event. Calculations were based on information from all 6442 respondents, including also those with sickness absence at baseline. The 13 events were classified into four categories: 1) death or severe illness of a family member (four items on the occurrence of death or severe illness of one’s own child or spouse); 2) being a victim of physical, psychological, or sexual violence (three items); 3) severe interpersonal conflict (three items measuring divorce, breakdown of some other important social relationship, and relational problems with spouse); and 4) severe financial difficulties (three items measuring loss of one’s job, unemployment of spouse, and financial hardships). The mean severity scores of events for death or illness of a family member, violence, interpersonal conflicts, and financial difficulties were 6.1, 5.5, 4.7, and 3.8, respectively. For each participant, the sum of weighted events in each category was calculated.

Psychological Factors
Psychological problems studied were anxiety, mental distress, and sense of coherence. Anxiety was measured using the six-item Anxiety-Trait Scale (items 1, 6, 10, 13, 16, and 19) (44). We used the trait scale instead of the state version because a short-term mood is not a likely risk factor for sickness absence and thus not a potential intervening factor. With the Anxiety-Trait Scale, the respondents were asked to indicate how well statements (eg, "I feel calm" and "I feel upset") describe them in general, as expressed on a scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so) (Cronbach {alpha} = .84).

Mental distress was determined using the 12-item version of Goldberg’s (45) General Health Questionnaire, which has produced results comparable with the longer versions of the General Health Questionnaire (46). The respondents rated the extent to which they had experienced symptoms such as depressive mood, anxiety, insomnia, and social dysfunction during the past weeks. The 12-item version has been associated with other measures of psychiatric disorders (46, 47) and has good discriminant validity in terms of the pattern of low or zero correlations with several personality dimensions (48). In the present sample, this measure was used as a sum score divided by the number of items (Cronbach = .89).

Sense of coherence was assessed using Antonovsky’s (27) short Orientation to Life Questionnaire measuring the aspects of meaningfulness, comprehensibility, and manageability with 13 items (eg, "How often do you have the feeling that you are not sure you can keep things under control?"). Without specifying the exact period of time, the respondents were asked to check their level of agreement with each item on a seven-point semantic differential scale with two anchoring phrases (eg, 1 = never happened, 7 = always happened) (Cronbach {alpha} = .82).

Behavioral Factors
The following behavioral factors were assessed: smoking, alcohol consumption, and alcohol intoxication. Smoking status was assessed by means of a question on whether the respondent was currently a regular smoker or not. Use of alcohol, expressed as logarithmically transformed grams of absolute alcohol consumed in an average week, was assessed using the four-item measure of Kaprio et al. (49). It requests the frequency and amount of alcohol used during an average week (or month) separately for beer, wine, and spirits. Alcohol intoxication was assessed by a single-item measure on the frequency of alcohol-induced loss of consciousness (passing out) during the last 12 months. Responses were dichotomized (no passing out vs. one or more episodes of passing out).

Sickness Absence
Our measure of sickness absence was the number of days absent from work due to sickness per person-year. We picked out all the periods coded as sick leave from January 1 to December 31, 1995 (sickness absence at baseline), and from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1998 (the outcome) from employers’ records on absences. We checked the records for inconsistencies. Overlapping episodes of sick leave were combined.

Employers participating in the 8-Town Study record each sick-leave period of every employee, including the dates when each episode started and ended. In the towns studied, employees are paid full salary during their sick leave from the first day. The employers receive compensation for loss of salary due to sick leave longer than 8 days from the Finnish Social Insurance Institution. The employers are motivated to keep strict records of the sick leave because all the compensation to which they are entitled is based on the records.

Maternity leaves and absences due to caring for a sick child are not included in the sickness absences. Finnish municipality work contracts allow an employee to be absent from work without interruptions in salary payment to care for a child under 10 years old with an acute illness. Each such absence spell is fully compensated up to 3 days, and there are no limitations on the number of episodes per employee per year. Thus, the participants had no reason to wrongly report being ill when staying at home to care for their own sick child.

Statistical Analysis
The hypothetical model was tested with structural equation modeling using LISREL 8.30 (50). This statistical program offers several indices to evaluate the fit of the model. We used the {chi}2 test, the goodness-of-fit index (GFI, values over .95 indicating acceptable fit), and SRMR (values .05 or below indicating an acceptable fit).

Testing was done separately for four major event categories (ie, the death or serious illness of a family member, violence, interpersonal conflict, and financial difficulties) in three steps: 1) testing of the null model, 2) testing of the measurement model, and 3) testing of the structural models (51). Age, life events, and sickness absence were treated as single-item factors with error variance fixed as zero. Anxiety, mental distress, and sense of coherence were observed variables for the latent construct of psychological problems. The construct of health-risk behaviors comprised measurements of smoking, use of alcohol, and alcohol intoxication.

In the null model, all observed variables were assigned to the same factor. The measurement model related the observed variables to the underlying constructs by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The next step tested the efficacy of the alternative structural models. Comparisons were made between a main effect model, containing life events, psychological problems, and health-risk behaviors as independent predictors of sickness absence, and the partial mediation model, where life events were additionally linked with psychological problems. To examine the nature of the mediated effects, comparisons were made between the partial mediation model and the full mediation model. The first-mentioned model included a direct link between life events and sickness absence, whereas the latter did not. In the full mediation model, life events were indirectly associated with sickness absence through psychological problems and health-risk behaviors.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
The 2,991 participants (ie, the initially healthy cohort) did not differ from the eligible 24,320 employees working in the target towns in terms of sex (percentage of women 73% and 72% in the participants and eligible population, respectively) or mean age (45.7 vs 45.1 years). The level of sickness absence during the follow-up was lower among the participants (8.2 days/person-years) than among the eligible population (18.3 days). Characteristics of participants corresponded well with those of all 6,442 respondents. Weighted scores of life-event categories varied between .41 and .63 and between .44 and .69 for the participants and for all respondents, respectively. For these groups, mean scores for anxiety (1.9 vs 1.9), mental distress (2.0 vs 2.0), sense of coherence (4.9 vs 4.9), smoking (17% vs 18%), use of alcohol (3.4 vs 3.3), and alcohol intoxication (8% vs 7%) were almost identical.

Of the participants, 8% (186 women and 49 men) had experienced death or severe illness of a family member, 7% (146 women and 47 men) had been a victim of a violent incident, 12% (255 women and 81 men) had been involved in interpersonal conflicts, and 11% (238 women and 95 men) had experienced financial difficulties. There were no differences in the frequency of and weighted sums of event categories between men and women.

Table 1 shows bivariate correlations among variables for men. Event categories were correlated with each other except for death or illness of a family member. Violence, interpersonal conflict, and financial difficulties were correlated with increased psychological problems as indicated by measures of anxiety, mental distress, or lowered sense of coherence. Financial difficulties and violence were correlated with unhealthy use of alcohol, but death or illness of a family member was associated with lowered use of alcohol. All life events except interpersonal conflicts were correlated with increased risk of sickness absence. Although all of the above-mentioned correlations were statistically significant, they were relatively low (coefficients between r = .08 and r = .25).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Means, Standard Deviations, and Bivariate Correlations Between Variables in Mena
 
Among women, violence, interpersonal conflicts, and financial difficulties were correlated (Table 2). Death or illness of a family member was correlated with financial difficulties but not with other event categories. All event categories were correlated with increased psychological problems, as indicated by increased anxiety or mental distress or by lowered sense of coherence. Interpersonal conflicts and financial difficulties were also correlated with unhealthy alcohol use. As in men, all of the above-listed correlations were relatively low (coefficients between r = .04 and r = .27). None of the events categories were correlated with sickness absence.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Means, Standard Deviations, and Bivariate Correlations Between Variables in Womena
 
Structural Equation Models in Male Sample
Structural equation models were calculated only for death or serious illness of a family member, violence, and financial difficulties in men. For interpersonal conflicts and among women, the association between life events and sickness absence was lacking. In testing the relationships between life events, psychological problems, behavioral risks, and sickness absence, the fit of the observed variables to the underlying constructs in the measurement model was satisfactory and significantly better than the null model in all event categories (Table 3). Thus, the preliminary requirements for testing the efficacy of structural models were met.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Fit Indices for the Tested Models in Mena
 
Table 3 shows the fit indices for the models tested. The models were adjusted for age based on the findings of bivariate relationships in the correlation matrix (Table 1). No difference in the fit to the data were found between the main effects model and the partial mediation model of death or serious illness of a family member. For this event category, the fit of the full mediation model was significantly worse than that of the main effects model. Thus, no single model of death or serious illness of a family member was unambiguously supported.

For violence (Figure 3) and financial difficulties (Figure 4), the partial mediation model fit the data significantly better than the main effects model and the full mediation model (Table 3). The partial mediation model also reached an acceptable level of fit (GFI > .95, SRMR <= .05). According to these findings, psychological problems and health-risk behaviors were linking factors between the life events and sickness absence. In addition, there was a direct link between the events and sickness absence, and this link was independent of the level of anxiety, mental distress, sense of coherence, or smoking and alcohol consumption.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. Structural models of violence and sickness absence in men (values are from the standardized solution; solid lines refer to significant (p < .05) paths and dashed lines to nonsignificant paths). P-factors = anxiety, mental distress, lowered sense of coherence. B-factors = heightened smoking and alcohol comsumption.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Structural models of financial difficulties and sickness absence in men (values are from the standardized solution; solid lines refer to significant (p < .05) paths and dashed lines to nonsignificant paths). P-factors = anxiety, mental distress, lowered sense of coherence. B-factors = heightened smoking and alcohol comsumption.

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We longitudinally explored the association between life events and subsequent health problems and tested psychological and behavioral factors underlying this association. Our findings support this association in data where health was assessed by recorded sickness absence. The evidence also suggests that anxiety, mental distress, lowered sense of coherence, smoking, and alcohol intake may have a role in the pathogenic process following a negative life event. However, the results were dependent on sex and the type of event.

In accordance with prior research, we found that all the event categories studied were associated with increased psychological problems and impaired health (1–15). The death and serious illness of family members are generally considered stressful life events. In the present study, they were rated as the most severe events. Holmes and Rahe (42) have specified that the loss of a spouse may be the most stressful life event. Other studies suggest that the loss of a child is at least as stressful if not more so (52).

Other life events, such as violence, interpersonal conflicts (eg, divorce), and financial difficulties were not rated as stressful as death or illness of a family member. However, a history of violence is particularly difficult to measure (53, 54). Koss (54), eg, found that many women with experiences that meet the legal definition of rape did not respond affirmatively to the study questions on this issue. Considering potential limitations in the validity of the measurement, the present results on violence may underestimate rather than overestimate health effects.

Different types of life events may be concentrated among the same people (14). Violence, interpersonal conflicts, and financial difficulties were interrelated both for men and women, but the interrelationships were moderate or weak. Death or illness of a family member was not related to other life events for men. For women, it was related to financial difficulties, which is as expected because, in many cases, the event refers to the loss of the primary wage earner in the family. A death or illness of a family member is usually entirely a person-independent event, but violence, interpersonal conflicts, and financial difficulties can be partially person dependent (14).

As in prior research (41, 55–57), men were more affected by life events than women. Among both sexes, life events were associated with psychological problems such as anxiety, mental distress, and lowered sense of coherence. However, increased risk for sickness absence was observed only for men. Additional analyses of those who had had a stressful event showed smaller social support networks for men than women. Social support might help in coping with life events (14) and thus provide a partial explanation for men’s higher vulnerability. These sex differences may also be related to gender-related selection into the working population and to occupational segregation.

Among men, the presently obtained parameter estimates of .08–.13 between life events and sickness absence indicate significant, if relatively small, effect sizes. This is to be expected from a theoretical point of view because multiple factors influence health. These include, eg, inherited characteristics, personality traits, socioeconomic position, working conditions, job characteristics, the structure and quality of interpersonal relations at work and in private life, features of living circumstances, and exposure to epidemics.

Findings of the structural equation modeling imply that part of the adverse health effects of life events may be avoidable if the person could cope with increased psychological distress without heightened alcohol use and smoking. In prior research, psychological problems such as posttraumatic disorders have been related to the effects of traumatic events on physical health (58). Our findings in men suggest that increased psychological problems and health-risk behaviors in combination may partially mediate the association between life events and illness. This model was supported in relation to violence and financial difficulties but not in relation to death or illness of a family member and interpersonal conflicts. Unlike in other events, death or illness of a family member was related to lower levels of alcohol consumption. The literature shows that some stressful events at the workplace, eg, major downsizing, may decrease rather than increase alcohol intake among employees (9).

Methodological Considerations
Studying the effects of life events is methodologically challenging (59–61). A strength of the present study is the opportunity to focus on a large nonclinical population in a longitudinal design with measurements of health status before the life event. The large sample size provided statistical power for separate analyses of different event categories.

In the present study, bias due to sample attrition or selection procedures is unlikely. Demographic characteristics of the participants corresponded with those of the racially homogenous white eligible population. Differences in survey responses between the participants and all respondents were minimal. During the follow-up period, the participants had fewer health problems than did the eligible employees, which is as expected considering that the former were initially healthy.

We measured sickness absences to determine changes in health. Although sickness absence is not a widely used health outcome, it has been argued to serve as a measure of health in the working population when health is understood as a combination of social, psychological, and physiological functioning (9, 15, 62). Such data have several advantages in the study of life events. First, they reflect major illnesses and also minor health problems that are often not possible to derive from the morbidity and mortality registers. Second, sickness absence data cover information on the health problems faced by employees on every working day of the study period. This helps in the determination of dating health problems. The quality of the data in terms of coverage, accuracy, and consistency over time can also be higher than that attained via self-reports. Third, by using records on sick leave, common-method variance with life events is avoided. Because the recording process for sick leave is a routine procedure, the impact of measurement on the studied responses is minimized.

Our estimates of the association between stressful life events and health should be regarded as conservative. We measured all sickness absences in the year after a participant had an event. Within the year, the exact point of time for the event was not requested. Some events occurred in the beginning, others in the middle, and still others at the end of the year. At least in the first two cases, the effect of the event on sickness absence may have been an underestimation due to the relatively long time lag between the measurements. Unpublished data on the men of the present cohort show that death or serious illness of a family member and interpersonal conflicts were more strongly associated with sickness absence in the year the participants had experienced the events than in the following year.

Similarly to most life-event studies (3, 16), the present study did not include a measurement of the underlying factors before the events. An ideal design would include this measurement; it would allow confirmation that the test on explanatory factors actually relates to a change in the intervening factor rather than to its stable level. Our inclusion criteria for participants, however, made confounding in this regard unlikely. To detect a psychological or behavioral factor as a link between an event and health, the factor needs to be strongly associated with health. Stable differences in such a factor between participants would create health differences at the baseline. In the present study, only initially healthy subjects at the baseline met the inclusion criterion. Thus, the effects of stable factors biasing the results were, to a large extent, eliminated.


   CONCLUSIONS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This longitudinal study on an initially healthy work population was based on day-to-day monitoring of health problems via recorded sickness absences. Men were found to be more vulnerable to the effects of stressful life events than were women. In the men, anxiety, mental distress, and lowered sense of coherence in combination with alcohol abuse and smoking contributed to the association between several life events and subsequent health problems. However, the associations and underlying mechanisms between stressful life events and health varied according to the event category.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
 
This study was supported by grants from the Finnish Work Environment Fund, the Academy of Finland (project 44968), the Finnish Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Finnish Local Government Pensions Institution, and the participating towns.

Received for publication September 29, 2000.


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 The Present Study
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bidzinska EJ. Stress factors in affective diseases. Br J Psychiatry 1984; 144: 161–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Billings AG, Cronkite RC, Moos RH. Social environment factors in unipolar depression: comparison of depressed patients and non-depressed controls. J Abnorm Psychol 1983; 92: 119–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Brown GW. Life events and affective disorder: replications and limitations. Psychosom Med 1993; 55: 248–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brown GW, Bifulco A, Harris TO. Life events, vulnerability and onset of depression: some refinements. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 30–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Brown GW, Harris TO. Life events and illness. New York: Guilford Press; 1989.
  6. Chen CC, David AS, Nunnerley H, Michell M, Dawson JL, Berry H, Dobbs J, Fahy T. Adverse life events and breast cancer: case-control study. Br Med J 1995; 311: 1527–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kessler RC. The effects of stressful life events on depression. Ann Rev Psychol 1997; 48: 191–214.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Thomson L, Griffiths A, Cox T, Pentti J. Psychosocial factors predicting employee sickness absence during economic decline. J Appl Psychol 1997; 82: 858–972.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Kivimäki M, Vahtera J, Pentti J, Ferrie JE. Factors underlying the effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 2000; 320: 971–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Neugebauer R, Kline J, Stein Z, Shrout P, Warburton D, Susser M. Association of stressful life events with chromosomally normal spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 588–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Rahe RH. Life change, stress responsivity, and captivity research. Psychosom Med 1990; 52: 373–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Potter EH, Antoni MH. Life events, social support and illness. Psychosom Med 1985; 47: 157–63.
  13. Theorell T, Blomkvist V, Lindh G, Evengård B. Critical life events, infections, and symptoms during the year preceding chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): an examination of CFS patients and subjects with a nonspecific life crisis. Psychosom Med 1999; 61: 304–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Thoits PA. Stress, coping, and social support processes: Where are we? What next? J Health Soc Behav 1995; 36: 53–79.[CrossRef]
  15. Vahtera J, Kivimäki M, Pentti J. Effect of organisational downsizing on health of employees. Lancet 1997; 350: 1124–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Melamed S, Kushnir T, Strauss E, Vigiser D. Negative association between reported life events and cardiovascular disease risk factors in employed men: the Cordis study. J Psychosom Res 1997; 43: 247–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Zimmermann-Tansella C, Donini S, Lattanzi M, Siciliani O, Turrina C, Wilkinson G. Life events, social problems and physical health status as predictors of emotional distress in men and women in a community setting. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 505–13.[Medline]
  18. Zuckerman LA, Oliver JM, Hollingsworth HH, Austrin HR. A comparison of life event scoring methods as predictors of psychological symptomatology. J Hum Stress 1986; 12: 64–70.
  19. Brown GW, Harris TO. The social origins of depression. New York: Free Press; 1978.
  20. Chan DW. Stressful life events, cognitive appraisals, and psychological symptoms among Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. J Youth Adolesc 1998; 27: 457–72.[CrossRef]
  21. Monroe SM. Major and minor life events as predictors of psychological distress: further issues and findings. J Behav Med 1983; 6: 189–205.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Spangenberg JJ, Pieterse C. Stressful life events and psychological status in black South African women. J Soc Psychol 1995; 135: 439–45.[Medline]
  23. Antonovsky A. Health, stress and coping. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1979.
  24. Goldsteen RL, Counte MA, Goldsteen K. Health status, the health events of significant others, and health locus of control. J Aging Studies 1995; 9: 83–99.
  25. Hensing G, Alexanderson K. The relation of adult experience of domestic harassment, violence, and sexual abuse to health and sickness absence. Int J Behav Med 2000; 7: 1–18.
  26. Feldt T, Kinnunen U, Mauno S. A mediational model of sense of coherence in the work context: a one-year follow-up study. J Organ Behav 2000; 21: 461–76.[CrossRef]
  27. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1987.
  28. Antonovsky A. The structural sources of salutogenic strengths. In: Cooper CL, Payne R, editors. Personality and stress: individual differences in the stress process. Chichester: Wiley; 1991. p. 67–104.
  29. Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 1993; 36: 725–33.
  30. Adler N, Matthews K. Health psychology: Why do some people get sick and some stay well? Annu Rev Psychol 1994; 45: 229–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Jose BS, van Oers HA, van de Mheen HD, Garratsen HF, Mackenbach JP. Stressors and alcohol consumption. Alcohol Alcohol 2000; 35: 307–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. O’Doherty F, Davies J. Life events and addiction: a critical review. Br J Addiction 1987; 82: 127–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Goldstein BI, Abela JR, Buchanan GM, Seligman ME. Attributional style and life events: a diathesis-stress theory of alcohol consumption. Psychol Rep 2000; 87: 949–55.[Medline]
  34. Horowitz AV, White HR, Howell-White S. The use of multiple outcomes in stress research: a case study of gender differences in responses to marital dissolution. J Soc Behav 1996; 37: 278–91.
  35. Steffy BD, Laker DR. Workplace and personal stresses antecedent to employees’ alcohol use. J Soc Behav Personality 1991; 6: 115–26.
  36. Kivimäki M, Feldt T, Vahtera J, Nurmi J-E. Sense of coherence and health: evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Soc Sci Med 2000; 50: 583–97.
  37. Marmot MG, Feeney A, Shipley M, North F, Syme SL. Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Comm Health 1995; 49: 124–30.[Abstract]
  38. Poppius E, Tenkanen J, Kalimo R, Heinsalmi P. The sense of coherence, occupation and the risk of coronary heart disease in the Helsinki Heart Study. Soc Sci Med 1999; 49: 109–20.
  39. Hemingway H, Marmot M. Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systemic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ 1999; 1460–7.
  40. Helsing KJ, Szklo M. Mortality after bereavement. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 41–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Umberson D, Wortman CB, Kessler RC. Widowhood and depression: explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. J Health Soc Behav 1992; 33: 10–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res 1967; 11: 213–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Dohrenwend BS, Krasnoff L, Askenasy AR, Dohrenwend BP. The psychiatric epidemiology research interview life events scale. In: Goldberg L, Breznitz S, editors. Handbook of stress: theoretical and clinical aspects. New York: Free Press; 1982. p. 332–63.
  44. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (form Y). Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
  45. Goldberg D. The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire (Maudsley monograph 21). London: Oxford University Press; 1972.
  46. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Puccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C. The validity of the two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 191–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. McCabe CJ, Thomas KJ, Brazier JE, Coleman P. Measuring the mental health status of a population: a comparison of the GHQ-12 and the SF-36 (MHI-5). Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 516–21.[Abstract]
  48. Cook M, Young A, Taylor D, Bedford A. Personality correlates of psychological distress. Pers Indiv Differ 1996; 20: 313–9.
  49. Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M, Langinvainio H, Romanov K, Sarna S, Rose RJ. Genetic influences on use and abuse of alcohol: a study of 5638 adult Finnish twin brothers. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1987; 11: 349–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International; 1996.
  51. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 1988; 103: 411–23.[CrossRef]
  52. Clayton PJ. The model of stress: the bereavement reaction. In: Dohrenwend BP, editor. Adversity, stress, and psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 96–110.
  53. Kilpatrick DG. Rape victims: detection, assessment, and treatment. Clin Psychol 1983; 36: 92–5.
  54. Koss MP. Detecting, the scope of rape: a review of prevalence and research methods. J Impersonal Violence 1993; 8: 198–222.
  55. Martikainen P, Valkonen T. Mortality after death of a spouse: rates and causes of death in a large Finnish cohort. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 1087–93.[Medline]
  56. van Grootheest DS, Beekman AT, van Groenou MIB, Deeg DJH. Sex differences in depression after widowhood. Do men suffer more? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999; 34: 391–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Lichtenstein P, Gatz M, Berg S. A twin study of mortality after spousal bereavement. Psychol Med 1998; 28: 635–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Schnurr PP, Spiro A, Paris AH. Physician-diagnosed medical disorders in relation to PTSD symptoms in older male military veterans. Health Psychol 2000; 19: 91–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Zimmerman M. Methodological issues in the assessment of life events: a review of issues and research. Clin Psychol Rev 1983; 3: 339–70.[CrossRef]
  60. Dohrenwend BP. Overview of evidence for the importance of adverse environmental conditions in causing psychiatric disorders. In: Dohrenwend BP, editor. Adversity, stress, and psychopathology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. p. 523–38.
  61. Dohrenwend BP. The role of adversity and stress in psychopathology: some evidence and its implications for theory and research. J Health Soc Behav 2000; 41: 1–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. World Health Organization. Health for all by the year 2000. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 1986.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. Elovainio, M. Jokela, M. Kivimaki, L. Pulkki-Raback, T. Lehtimaki, N. Airla, and L. Keltikangas-Jarvinen
Genetic Variants in the DRD2 Gene Moderate the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Depressive Symptoms in Adults: Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
Psychosom Med, June 1, 2007; 69(5): 391 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Psychosom. Med.Home page
J. Vahtera, M. Kivimaki, A. Vaananen, A. Linna, J. Pentti, H. Helenius, and M. Elovainio
Sex differences in health effects of family death or illness: are women more vulnerable than men?
Psychosom Med, March 1, 2006; 68(2): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. Virtanen, M. Kivimaki, M. Elovainio, P. Virtanen, and J. Vahtera
Local economy and sickness absence: prospective cohort study
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, November 1, 2005; 59(11): 973 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
G. Hensing and R. Wahlstrom
Chapter 7. Sickness absence and psychiatric disorders
Scand J Public Health, October 1, 2004; 32(5): 152 - 180.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kivimäki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kevin, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kivimäki, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kevin, M. V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Health Policy
Right arrow Stress and Coping

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS