| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Address reprint requests to: Oliver G. Cameron, MD, PhD, University of Michigan Medical Center, Room C9154, University Hospital, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0120. Email: ocameron{at}umich.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: In this study regional changes in the cerebral metabolic rate for glucose were determined with positron emission tomography in response to cardiovascular-respiratory activation induced in healthy humans by ß-adrenergic stimulation produced with intravenous isoproterenol, which acts predominantly in the periphery because of minimal transport across the blood-brain barrier.
RESULTS: Interoceptive activation raised heart rate to approximately 120 beats per minute, produced somatic and to a lesser extent psychological symptoms, and significantly increased cerebral glucose metabolism in the left primary somatosensory cortex and medial portion of the cingulate gyrus; right insular cortex showed a trend toward an increase that was significant in homogeneous subgroups of right-handed or female subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the involvement of specific brain regions as well as hemispheric laterality of function in visceral perception, and they suggest that during emotional reactions involving changes in visceral organ function, activation of some of the brain regions observed could be due specifically to interoceptive processes.
Key Words: interoception, isoproterenol, cerebral glucose metabolism, positron emission tomography, emotion, humans.
Abbreviations: ACPC = anterior commissure posterior commissure;; ANOVA = analysis of variance;; CMRglu = cerebral metabolic rate for glucose;; CNS = central nervous system;; FWHM = full-width, half-maximum;; PET = positron emission tomography;; ROI = region of interest.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prior studies have indicated that specific brain regions are involved in interoceptive processes, including the insular cortex (1114), cingulate gyrus (1417), somatosensory cortex (18, 19), frontal cortex (11, 15, 16, 20), amygdala (14), and thalamus (11, 15, 16). Other structures implicated at least indirectly include the nucleus of the solitary tract, parabrachial nucleus, locus ceruleus, and periaqueductal gray of the brain stem; the subcortical hippocampus, mamillary bodies, and hypothalamus; the cortical temporal pole and parahippocampal gyrus; and various fiber bundles that connect these structures (9). Many of the studies that have implicated these structures have focused not only on interoceptive processes per se but more broadly on brain regions activated by emotions (18, 2125), including sadness and depression (2634), fear (1, 3537), and anxiety (33, 3840), and by pain (41, 42), although some studies associated more directly with interoceptive cardiovascular (11, 15, 16), respiratory (11, 13, 14), and alimentary-gastrointestinal tract (11, 4346) functions (including disgust; Refs. 29, 47, and 48) have also been reported. Many of these studies have observed laterality effects, that is, structures on one side of the brain affected with analogous structures on the opposite side not showing the same effect. Some of these studies have used administration of pharmacological substances to produce the brain activation and interoceptive stimuli (7, 15, 16, 49, 50), similar to the research described here.
This positron emission tomographic (PET) functional imaging study determined brain regions activated by cardiac and respiratory interoception in human subjects with normal cardiovascular and respiratory function. Pharmacological activation with isoproterenol, a nonselective ß-adrenergic receptor agonist with a short half-life in blood (51) that has both chronotropic and inotropic effects on the heart (52) and relaxes bronchial smooth muscle, was used because less than 4% crosses the blood-brain barrier on the first pass after intravenous administration (53). Hence, isoproterenol can be expected to produce minimal acute direct chemical effects on brain. Any observed stimulatory changes in brain function therefore are most likely to be due to afferent sensory nerve input. Thus, isoproterenol administration should provide a highly controllable experimental model of interoceptive processes. Based on the previous studies described above, a priori hypotheses predicted interoceptive stimulation would activate the following regions: insula, cingulate gyrus, amygdala, frontal cortex, thalamus, and somatosensory cortex. These prior studies are most consistent for interoceptive stimulation to activate insula and cingulate, with amygdala activation expected to the extent that fear or anxiety reactions occur and somewhat less consistent support for the other regions.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
After the first symptom ratings, 10 mCi of 18F-flourodeoxyglucose was administered by intravenous bolus in 3 to 5 ml of normal saline. Changes in cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRglu) were studied because isoproterenol might have direct pharmacological effects on the human cerebral vasculature (O. G. Cameron, unpublished observations, 1998; see Discussion).
Immediately after glucose administration, during glucose uptake into brain, the experimental solution was infused continuously for 30 minutes. The study was performed single blind; before infusion subjects were not aware of their group assignment. Isoproterenol in normal saline was infused at a rate that raised heart rate to approximately 120 beats per minute throughout the 30 minutes. This was accomplished by moment-to-moment titration of flow rate, based on continuous heart rate monitoring, out of sight and hearing of the subject. During infusion all subjects closed their eyes, room lights were dimmed, ambient noise was minimized, and subjects were instructed not to sleep.
After 30 minutes of infusion of either isoproterenol or placebo, and glucose uptake into brain, the infusion was stopped and PET data acquisition was initiated. Subjects were scanned for 60 minutes, producing 15 slices with approximately 8 mm full-width, half-maximum (FWHM) between slices. Processing of scans to measure the CMRglu (mg of glucose/min per 100 ml of tissue), normalized to whole brain (54), was performed as described below.
Symptom rating data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVAs (grouping variable: isoproterenol vs. placebo infusion; repeated measure; baseline ratings vs. retrospective ratings for time of infusion), based on log-transformed data. Other scan and nonscan variables were compared for the isoproterenol group vs. the placebo group with repeated measures and two-sample t tests. Pearson product-moment correlations were used to assess relationships between symptoms and regions of brain activation.
PET image data were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping techniques developed extensively in our facility (5558). Emission scans were reconstructed with calculated attenuation correction using a standard ellipse-fitting method (59). All images were transformed to a standard stereotactic coordinate system (based on the human brain atlas of Talairach and Tournoux"Talairach space"; Ref. 60) and deformed to match the shape of the standard atlas brain (57). Images were averaged across subjects on a pixel-by-pixel basis to form statistical parametric maps (55, 61). A statistical threshold to identify significantly activated brain regions was determined by the use of a smoothed Gaussian field with a pooled variance (62).
Regional scan data were assessed in two ways. The analyses for both methods contrasted the subjects given isoproterenol with those given placebo. (No scans of brain structure were performed.) One method, involving a pixel-by-pixel analysis, provided assessment of potential differences between groups in regional brain activation without any preexisting assumptions about either the anatomically defined areas of the brain that were expected to be activated in this paradigm or the specific borders of those regions hypothesized to be involved. In this method, a pixel-by-pixel t-score analysis was performed across the whole brain with the analysis significance level of p
.05, adjusted for multiple tests. The threshold parameters for statistical significance were defined based on peak height.
The other method was based on regions of interest (ROIs) predefined for each region by the standard brain atlas (60) and applied consistently to individual scans in the stereotactic coordinate system. This method makes specific assumptions of the boundaries of the anatomical regions being considered. Based on the brain areas hypothesized above to be activated by interoceptive stimulation, 14 ROIs were analyzed, including right and left sides for insular cortex, anterior cingulate gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus, thalamus, frontal association cortex, primary sensory cortex, and amygdala. Specific ROIs were constructed by combining the appropriate small spherical regions into the 14 anatomically defined regions (60). Differences were assessed for individual brain regions with unpaired t tests. The ROI method provides one means of potential comparison across studies, that is, the same named regions can be assumed to have the same locales in the various studies being compared. Studies can also be compared on the basis of the axial coordinates of regions of activity change, applicable to the pixel-by-pixel method.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For the pixel-by-pixel image analysis, including all 24 subjects, with adjustment for multiple tests (Table 2 and Fig. 1, top), two regions showed significant activation by isoproterenol. The first was the midline structure apparent most prominently at 41 mm above and, less intensely, at 50 mm above the anterior commissure-posterior commissure (ACPC) line. Based on the brain atlas (60), this structure is the medial region of the cingulate gyrus, straddling Brodmann areas 23 and 24 (and possibly involving other Brodmann areas as well, such as area 31), with the peak of activation in the anterior part of area 23. The other structure is in the posterior part of the left hemisphere at 50 mm above the ACPC line. In Talairach space, although being slightly posterior, it approximates the medial aspect of the left postcentral gyrus, that is, the left primary somatosensory region, with the peak of activation in that part associated with the trunk of the body. A small number of other small areas of subthreshold activation were also present. It is not clear, however, if they represent image noise or true activation that did not reach significance because of limits of statistical power. With all subjects included, no other brain regions at other levels showed any areas of activation that attained statistical significance, and no areas of significant deactivation were observed.
|
|
Because of the possibility that gender and handedness might affect results (26, 27, 63), the right insular region was reanalyzed with both data analysis methods with the largest homogeneous subject group, right-handed females, included (N = 8 in each group). For this subgrouping the right insular cortex was now statistically significant (unadjusted two-tailed test, t = 3.03, df = 14, p < .01; Table 2 and Fig. 1, bottom). The actual mean ratios (to whole brain) now were 1.028 for the placebo group and 1.070 for the isoproterenol group. Further analyses of these right insular cortex predetermined regional data were consistent with the hypothesis that both handedness and gender influenced laterality. Excluding left-handed subjects only (leaving 10 in each group) or excluding males only (leaving 9 in each group) also produced significant p values (all right handed: t = 2.22, df = 18, p < .04; all females: t = 2.44, df = 16, p < .03). There were a few other sporadic areas of activation, including a smaller, weaker area of activation in the left insula (Fig. 1, bottom), but these areas did not approach statistical significance.
The question of potential relationships of activated ROIs with symptom ratings was investigated in two ways. First, for the 12 subjects who received isoproterenol, correlations were performed for the activated regions, both right and left side for primary somatosensory cortex, insula, anterior cingulate, and posterior cingulate, with each of the 11 symptom ratings for the infusion (post time in Table 2). Second, the same ROIs were also correlated with change scores (post time minus pre time). After adjustment for multiple tests, none of the correlations were significant at the p < .05 level, there was no discernible pattern of trends toward significance, and there was no consistent pattern of positive (or negative) correlations either for a specific symptom with several regions or a specific region with several symptoms.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using the ROI analysis, the insula was significant with a one-tailed test and showed a trend with a two-tailed test when all subjects were included. It was significant with a two-tailed test in all right-handed or all female subjects. With this analysis the regions found to be significantly different in the pixel-by-pixel analysis, cingulate and left somatosensory cortex, were not different when predetermined ROIs were analyzed, most likely because the predefined regions did not precisely coincide with the regions observed in the pixel-by-pixel analysis. The areas significant in the pixel-by-pixel analysis were only "subregions" of the ROIs defined for this study; that is, only part of the whole somatosensory cortex and only part of the whole cingulate were activated. (In subsequent studies use of ROIs that coincide with the regions found to be significant with the pixel-by-pixel analysis would allow a priori tests of the hypotheses that these regions are activated by interoceptive processes.) Significance of the right insula with the ROI analysis is consistent with the fact that, for the insula, the ROIs closely coincided with the pattern of activation observed.
Activation of the insular cortex was more robust when only right-handed or only female subjects were included. This result is consistent with prior findings indicating that gender as well as handedness are related to cerebral hemispheric laterality effects (26, 27, 63), including results related to cardiac interoception (6466). Prior studies indicated that the right hemisphere ("nondominant" for right-handed individuals) is mainly involved in cardiac control (6772), although the left hemisphere is involved in some functions as well (7073) (which would be consistent with possible activation of the left insula observed in this study, if further research indicates that left insular activation does occur in response to cardiovascular-respiratory stimulation). In this study hemispheric laterality effects were also seen in the primary somatosensory cortex. Activation was observed only in the hemisphere opposite to the side of insular activation (ie, "dominant" left hemisphere), typically associated with crossed sensory information originating from the right side of the body. Many of the prior studies referenced above also reported activations and/or deactivations of many regions occurring only unilaterally.
All three of the brain areas activated in this study have been associated in prior research with viscerosomatic sensation and emotion (including anxiety, and sadness or depression). A comparison of the brain regions activated in the present study to those regions activated in prior research, identified either by the coordinates in Talairach space (60) or by the brain regions defined by the Brodmann system (74), revealed the following. Respiratory stimulation (13, 14) produced activation in the insula and cingulate regions at approximately the same coordinate locations as seen in the present study. Insular activation (as well as posterior thalamus and medial prefrontal cortex) was also seen when cardiovascular-respiratory stimulation was produced by maximal inspiration, the Valsalva maneuver, and isometric handgrip (11). In contrast, pharmacologically induced anginal pain due to myocardial ischemia was associated with activation in a more anterior part of the cingulate, whereas decreases were reported in other cingulate areas, and neither insular cortex nor somatosensory cortex showed changes (15, 16). Thermal stimulation also activated the insula (12, 41), whereas production of the emotional reaction of disgust activated the insula in only one (48) of three (29, 47) comparison studies. One of these studies (47) also observed posterior cingulate activation, but in a different area than observed in the present study.
Various emotional states have been investigated. Anxiety activated insula (33, 34, 39); in one study it also activated posterior cingulate and left somatosensory cortex (33). One study of several self-generated emotions (18) reported activation in insula, posterior cingulate, and somatosensory cortex, and in a review (25) it was concluded that the posterior cingulate is often activated by emotion. Despite this most of the studies of fear, sadness and depression, or positive emotion referenced above, including those involving pharmacological provocation (15, 16, 49, 50), did not activate the same regions as those observed in the present study, with the exception of the yohimbine infusion study (7), which did activate insular cortex.
The occurrence of interoceptive processes does not require awareness of visceral organ function, but such awareness when present certainly makes an important contribution to the pattern of CNS activation observed. In the present study mental and especially cardiorespiratory symptoms were produced by the isoproterenol infusions, and most probably played a role in CNS activation. Despite this the precise role is unclear because correlations of symptoms with activated brain regions were not significant, undoubtedly in part because of the experimentally determined low level of variability in cardiovascular-respiratory activation as well as cardiac symptomatology (see Table 1). Because of this lack of correlation, it is not clear to what extent subjective symptom intensity contributed to the pattern or magnitude of CNS activation observed. With reference to the symptoms measuring emotional reactions to isoproterenol (anxiety and distress), they were the least intense and therefore probably least likely to influence the CNS activation pattern seen. Although it is highly likely that visceral sensory input to the brain contributes to the pattern of brain activation seen during some emotional states, the contribution occurring in the present study seems to be relatively small, making the results of this experiment mainly due to interoceptive processes per se.
To summarize briefly, those studies that produced states typically associated with viscerosomatic-autonomic activation (eg, cardiac, respiratory, or thermal stimulation), including studies of emotion that produced such activation (eg, anxiety), produced brain activation in regions similar to the results of the present study, whereas those that typically did not produce visceral activation with associated symptoms (sadness or depression, positive emotion) produced a different pattern. There were exceptions, including cardiac pain (15, 16), disgust (29, 47), and the various studies that produced fear. Overall, as noted above, the CNS activation pattern seen in this study seems to be indicative of interoceptive activation but distinct from emotional activation per se. In light of the findings of the present study along with prior research, the brain regions most consistently involved in cardiovascular-respiratory interoception seem to be the insula and medial or posterior cingulate.
There are benefits and limitations of the methods used and results obtained in this study. Use of isoproterenol to induce the cardiovascular-respiratory interoceptive stimulus has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are that it has a rapid onset and offset of physiological effect and a brief half-life in blood, allowing well-defined onset and offset of the experimental stimulus. Furthermore, moment-to-moment tracking of heart rate can provide a direct independent measurement of the physiological function of the heart, the presumptive primary source of the interoceptive cue. Determinations of blood pressure, other methods of baroreceptor functional assessment, and respiratory rate and excursion could also be performed in subsequent studies to further assess the physiological changes potentially associated with the interoceptive process.
A possible disadvantage of the use of isoproterenol is that a small amount does enter the brain (53); therefore, the pattern of brain activation observed in this study might be due in part to direct pharmacological effects rather than solely to interoceptive mechanisms. However, our study that used yohimbine, another substance that produces adrenergic activation but freely enters brain (7), found a different pattern of brain activation (including insula but otherwise different regions), indicating that direct adrenergic pharmacological effects on brain do not fully account for the pattern of regional brain activation observed in the present study.
In addition to the use of isoproterenol to produce the interoceptive stimulus, there are other advantages as well. Glucose metabolism is a better method of measurement of regional brain activation for this study than is cerebral blood flow. First, glucose metabolism might be more directly coupled to neuronal activity than is cerebral blood flow (7577). If so, it would be generally a better measure of regional brain activation. Second, more directly related to the present study, we performed a study similar to the present study (unpublished) in which cerebral blood flow was measured after isoproterenol administration. Unlike the well-defined pattern of activation observed in the present study, the blood flow changes occurred in a patchy pattern of both increases and decreases that were not consistent with activation in hypothesized regions and did not clearly coincide with well-defined anatomical brain regions. There are several possible reasons for this. It could reflect regional effects of isoproterenol directly on the cerebral vasculature, which might or might not be due to hyperventilation. (Hyperventilation decreases whole-brain cerebral blood flow, but in humans, after adjustment for hyperventilation, whole-brain cerebral blood flow does not seem to be affected by isoproterenol (53). Prior research did not address potential regional changes.) Variability in the scan data leading to insufficient power to detect a consistent pattern is also possible, but this is less likely because distinctly significant changes were seen in some areas, and both the isoproterenol and placebo data were based on averaging of three scans in each condition from each of the six subjects studied. Third, unlike the findings in many functional imaging studies that areas of deactivation are observed along with areas of activation, no areas of significant deactivation were observed in the present study. The physiological meaning of deactivation in brain function is often hard to interpret.
Some aspects of the study could be considered both advantageous and disadvantageous. Using a between-subject design eliminates the need for subjects to have repeated studies on different days (unlike measurement of cerebral blood flow, repeated CMRglu studies on the same day are generally impractical), reducing potential subject data loss because a subject fails to return for the second study session. On the other hand, a within-subject design would reduce data variability (eg, variability due to imprecision in transforming individual brains to the shape of the standardized stereotactic coordinate system and thus imprecision in overlaying identical brain regions from different subjects). This would allow a smaller number of subjects to be studied with the same statistical power or the same number of subjects with augmented potential to identify interoceptive activation of other regions. Furthermore, a within-subject design would permit subject-by-subject calculation of ROI or pixel-by-pixel difference scores between conditions, which can be advantageous for interpretation of results such as correlational analyses. (In further studies robust correlational analyses will also need more subjects and, even more important, a range of heart rate increases.) Thus, the between-subject design has the advantage of reducing attrition problems, whereas the within-subject design provides several other methodological benefits.
Use of predetermined ROIs as the basis for analysis of regional brain activation can also be either advantageous or disadvantageous. As already noted, it permits other investigators using the same ROIs to make direct comparisons across studies. On the other hand, as seen in this study, if an area of activation does not clearly coincide with the predefined ROI, the area might be significantly activated, but it would not be apparent simply by the ROI analysis. For this reason both methods (ROI and pixel-by-pixel) were performed and reported in this study.
Several issues limit the interpretation or generalizability of these results. First, cardiovascular-respiratory interoception was produced by pharmacologically induced activation comparable to mild to moderate exercise. It is not certain how these results might relate to nonpharmacologically induced awareness, including awareness under basal conditions. Second, the placebo group was somewhat older than the isoproterenol group (mean difference approximately 6 years), but mean age for both groups was young adult. Results might or might not be applicable to other age groups. Third, the glucose metabolism scan data are not absolute; they are relative to whole brain. In other words these data do not literally demonstrate that the regions reported had increases in absolute metabolic rates. They had greater increases than whole brain, which could represent absolute increases or decreases, although increases (ie, increased neuronal activity) seem much more likely.
Finally, there are potential limitations related to mechanism that require comment. The regions that were activated might be directly involved in sensing physiological changes in the viscera, or they might be involved secondarily, reflecting not only sensation per se but also additional CNS processing of the bodily afferent impulses (such as is likely to occur in association with emotional reactions).
One important mechanistic question is the role that baroreceptor stimulation might have played in the observed results. Measurement of variables other than heart rate that might provide an estimate of potential baroreceptor involvement, such as blood pressure determinations, were avoided in the present study to keep any sensory input to the subjects to a minimum. Thus, the possible role of baroreceptor changes produced by isoproterenol on the pattern of regional brain activation observed in this study cannot be assessed directly. Prior research implicates involvement of the insular cortex in baroreceptor mechanisms (7881). In contrast, it does not seem that either the somatosensory region or the cingulate region activated in this study are related in any direct way to baroreceptor function. Thus, baroreception might have contributed to the pattern seen, but it is unlikely to have been the sole source of the changes observed. This issue might be moot because a broad definition of interoception would include baroreception as a component of the larger phenomenon of interoceptive processes.
Some of the regions that might have been expected to show activation did not do so. The regions that were hypothesized to be activated in this study but were notamygdala, frontal cortex, and thalamushave been implicated in the neurobiology of emotion. It is possible, for example, that the amygdala was not activated because subjects rated the procedure as only mildly to moderately distressing and anxiogenic. It is likely that there is substantial overlap and convergence of regions involved in emotion with those involved in interoception, but it is unlikely that exactly the same regions are involved. It is most likely possible to separate or tease apart these regional differences. For example, the somatosensory cortex was activated in this study, whereas such activation has not been reported in imaging studies of cognitively induced emotion. The contribution of visceral sensory nerve impulses to the pattern of regional brain activation that is observed as part of an overall emotional reaction perhaps can be isolated from other neurobiological aspects of emotion.
In summary, isoproterenol infusion produced changes in heart rate, cardiorespiratory, and (to a lesser extent) mental anxiety symptoms, and increases in CMRglu in the medial region of the cingulate gyrus, the truncal region of the left somatosensory cortex, and the right insula. (Based on prior studies, increases in respiration and changes in blood pressure most likely also occurred, but these parameters were not measured in this study; Ref. 52.) Baroreceptor effects might contribute to the CNS activation pattern observed, but they are unlikely to account for it fully (eg, symptom awareness is not associated with baroreception per se). Increases in cardiac and respiratory function, associated with cardiorespiratory symptoms, are often observed during emotional states, especially negative emotions such as fear and anger. As such the pattern of CNS changes seen during somatic activation produced with isoproterenol is relevant to an overall understanding of the pattern of brain activation observed during emotion. But because cardiorespiratory interoceptive awareness does not require the presence of any increase in emotion, and given that the emotional experience reported in this study was not prominent, it is also unlikely that emotional reactions fully account for the results observed in this study. In other words interoceptive processes are probably linked to both baroreception and the bodily reaction to emotion but are not factually or logically synonymous with either. Beyond the importance of addressing the century-old question of their relevance to emotion, interoceptive processes are most likely intimately related to the pathophysiologies of a number of medical and psychiatric disorders and are themselves an understudied area of sensory physiology. Understanding the psychobiology of interoception will be fundamental to a full understanding of psychosomatic processes.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication December 21, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. H. Novack, O. Cameron, E. Epel, R. Ader, S. R. Waldstein, S. Levenstein, M. H. Antoni, and A. R. Wainer Psychosomatic Medicine: The Scientific Foundation of the Biopsychosocial Model Acad Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 31(5): 388 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. G. Cameron, G. C. Huang, T. Nichols, R. A. Koeppe, S. Minoshima, D. Rose, and K. A. Frey Reduced {gamma}-Aminobutyric AcidA-Benzodiazepine Binding Sites in Insular Cortex of Individuals With Panic Disorder Arch Gen Psychiatry, July 1, 2007; 64(7): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |