This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dolder, C. R. Articles by Jeste, D. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dolder, C. R. Articles by Jeste, D. V. Related Collections Blood Pressure Psychosis Therapeutic Interventions

Adherence to Antipsychotic and Nonpsychiatric Medications in Middle-Aged and Older Patients With Psychotic Disorders

From the Department of Psychiatry (C.R.D., J.P.L., D.V.J.), University of California, San Diego; and the Pharmacy Service (J.P.L., C.R.D.) and Psychiatry Service (D.V.J.), Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.

Address reprint requests to: Christian R. Dolder, PharmD, Geriatric Psychiatry Intervention Research Center, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 116A-1, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr., San Diego, CA 92161. Email: cdolder{at}ucsd.edu

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and consequences of nonadherence to antipsychotic medications in schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders have been well described; however, little is known about adherence to medications for nonpsychiatric conditions in patients with psychotic disorders. We wished to determine medication adherence in nondemented middle-aged and older Veterans Affairs outpatients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders who had been prescribed oral medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or diabetes.

METHODS: Medication adherence was assessed by review of medication fill records for 76 patients aged 40 years and older who had been prescribed an oral antipsychotic in addition to an oral agent for hypertension (N = 60), hyperlipidemia (N = 28), or diabetes (N = 24). Up to 12 months of therapy was reviewed, and a compliant fill rate (the number of adherent fills in proportion to the total number of prescription fills) and cumulative mean gap ratio (the number of days when medication was unavailable in relation to the total number of days) were calculated for each medication.

RESULTS: The 12-month mean compliant fill rates for antipsychotics, antihypertensives, antihyperlipidemics, and antidiabetics ranged from 52% to 64%. Nonpsychiatric medication adherence rates were similar in patients on typical vs. atypical antipsychotics and did not correlate significantly with antipsychotic adherence rates.

CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence rates were found to be equally problematic for both antipsychotic and nonpsychiatric medications in middle-aged and older patients with psychotic disorders. Interventions to improve adherence to both antipsychotic and nonpsychiatric medications are needed.

Key Words: medication adherence • psychosis • hypertension • hyperlipidemia • diabetes.

Abbreviations: CFR = compliant fill rate; CMGR = cumulative mean gap ratio.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
The prevalence of antipsychotic nonadherence and its consequences are well known. Deviation from antipsychotic maintenance treatment leads to numerous clinical and economic burdens, including psychotic relapse, increased clinic visits, emergency room visits, and rehospitalization (1, 2). Furthermore, nonadherence to prescribed antipsychotic regimens compromises the ability to enjoy a satisfactory quality of life and function optimally (3). Examining adherence to medications besides antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia is important because comorbid medical conditions are common (4), yet there is a lack of studies examining this issue (5, 6). In general, adherence with medication regimens for physical disorders has been demonstrated to be problematic in patients with nonpsychiatric conditions (7–11).

Cramer and Rosenheck (7) reviewed studies of medication adherence for antipsychotics, antidepressants, and a variety of nonpsychiatric medications. Patients receiving antipsychotics took an average of 58% of the recommended quantity of medication, and patients prescribed antidepressants took 65% of the recommended amount. Studies involving patients with nonpsychiatric disorders (eg, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or epilepsy) reported an average adherence rate of 76%, although the use of microelectronic monitoring in these studies might have led to an overestimation of adherence (7). Improving adherence to nonpsychiatric medications for disease states such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes is important because inadequate treatment of these disorders can have long-term negative consequences (12–16).

Reports suggest that mortality in persons with schizophrenia is two to four times greater than that in the general population (17–19). Although this difference in mortality is due in part to the increased risk of suicide in people with schizophrenia, undertreated physical illness, to which nonadherence can contribute, may also be a factor in increased mortality (4).

More information specifically addressing nonpsychiatric medication adherence in patients with psychotic disorders is needed, especially in older patients, because they are more likely to be prescribed medications for concomitant medical disorders (15) and have more complex medication regimens, cognitive and sensory deficits, and ageist beliefs that impede adherence (21, 22). Furthermore, symptoms of schizophrenia such as lack of insight likely hinder adherence to a variety of medications in addition to antipsychotics.

The purpose of this study was to determine medication adherence in veterans 40 years of age and older with psychotic disorders who had been prescribed maintenance treatments for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and/or diabetes in addition to antipsychotic therapy. Adherence rates reported for antihypertensives, antihyperlipidemics, and antidiabetics range from 20% to 75% (9, 23–30). Although these rates are similar to the adherence rate for antipsychotics, the published study samples were not composed of psychotic individuals. Considering the side effect profile of antipsychotics and results from Cramer and Rosenheck (7) demonstrating widespread but possibly different levels of adherence among various agents, we wanted to test the hypothesis that antipsychotic nonadherence would be greater than nonadherence with nonpsychiatric medications. Based on previous findings (31–33) that antipsychotic adherence was moderately greater with atypical than with typical agents, and the suggestion that atypical agents can improve some domains of cognition (34–36) and modestly improve negative symptoms (37), we wanted to test the hypothesis that patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics would have greater adherence to nonpsychiatric medications than those receiving conventional agents. In a secondary analysis, we assessed whether adherence to nonpsychiatric medications was correlated with antipsychotic adherence and whether nonadherence was associated with medication quantity (ie, total number of medications and total number of dosages consumed per 24 hours).

	METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Patient Selection
This protocol was approved by the University of California, San Diego, Human Subjects Committee. Subjects were identified from a previous study in which antipsychotic adherence for up to 12 months was examined in 288 outpatients from the VA San Diego Healthcare System (31). Patients were receiving chronic maintenance therapy with one of the following antipsychotics: haloperidol (N = 57), perphenazine (N = 60), risperidone (N = 80), olanzapine (N = 63), or quetiapine (N = 28). In the earlier study, all patients prescribed one of these antipsychotics within a 3-month time period were identified using computerized records, and consecutive patients meeting selection criteria were included. In the current study, all patients 40 years of age and older receiving an oral antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, or antidiabetic agent were identified. We included only those at least 40 because middle-aged and older adults were more likely to be receiving medications for the nonpsychiatric conditions we were studying. The sample was restricted to patients with 1) a DSM-IV–based chart diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, mood disorder with psychotic features, or psychosis not otherwise specified; and 2) a minimum of two prescription fills accounting for at least 60 days’ worth of medication (for both the antipsychotic and nonpsychiatric medication). Excluded were individuals with nonpsychotic mood disorders or behavioral disturbances secondary to dementia or other general medical conditions. In addition, patients who, according to chart review, appeared to be receiving even part of their medical care outside the VA system were excluded. These selection criteria led to a total sample of 76, with 60 patients prescribed an antihypertensive, 28 receiving an antihyperlipidemic, and 24 taking an antidiabetic agent. Of the three nonpsychiatric medications examined, 28 patients were prescribed two of the agents, and 5 were receiving all three of the medications.

Data Collection
Demographic and relevant clinical information, including age, gender, ethnicity, psychiatric diagnosis, and psychotropic medications, was obtained. Medication profiles were examined for the use of oral agents for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes with fill dates and the supplied quantity of medications (in days) recorded.

Adherence to prescribed regimens was determined by examining computerized medication fill records covering a 12-month period. Rates of adherence were calculated separately for each patient’s antipsychotic, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and/or antidiabetic agent at 6 and 12 months. Adherence was computed using two methods: compliant fill rate (CFR) and cumulative mean gap ratio (CMGR) (38, 39).

CFR represents the proportion of total fills that are adherent, ie, filled at time-appropriate intervals, for a specified period of time. Adherence was assessed by comparing the number of days of medication supply to the number of calendar days between fills. Those fills obtained within 20% of the previous prescription’s completion were considered adherent (38, 39). An exception to this rule occurred when a prescription became invalid because of a change in therapy, eg, dose change or new medication. In such cases medication was prematurely filled but was deemed adherent because the provider had altered the original therapy. CMGR was calculated by dividing the number of days of medication that were unavailable for consumption (because of delayed refill) by the total number of days during the same interval (38). Thus, CFR is based on a series of dichotomous assessments of adherence, whereas CMGR provides a continuous assessment detecting the magnitude of gaps in therapy. Medication profiles were also examined to calculate the number of scheduled oral daily medications and the total number of prescribed tablets or capsules consumed per day. If a patient was prescribed more than one agent for a disorder (eg, two medications for hypertension), the agent with the highest nonadherence was recorded and used for data analysis.

Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to determine patient demographics, medication information, and adherence rates for antipsychotic, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic agents. Independent samples t tests and chi-square analyses were used to compare characteristics (ie, age, gender, ethnicity, diagnosis, and quantity of medications) between individuals prescribed typical vs. atypical antipsychotics. Because of the small expected frequencies with some of these analyses, Fisher’s exact test was performed to compare the two groups on gender. Univariate analysis of variance was conducted to compare adherence rates among the four types of medications (ie, antipsychotic, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic) and to evaluate nonpsychiatric medication adherence rates among patients prescribed typical vs. atypical antipsychotics. Pearson correlations were computed to determine 1) relationships between medication adherence and quantity of medication and 2) adherence between antipsychotic and nonpsychiatric medications. All statistical tests were two-tailed with significance set at .05.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
Patient Characteristics
Seventy-six patients met selection criteria. The mean age of the subjects was 54 years (SD = 11). In general, the sample was comprised of whites (57%, N = 43) and men (95%, N = 72). Seventy-eight percent of the patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (N = 41) or schizoaffective disorder (N = 18). The remaining patients had a diagnosis of mood disorder with psychotic features (N = 11) or psychosis not otherwise specified (N = 6). The mean number of prescribed oral medications (5.6) and the total number of dosages taken per day (9.9) showed that most patients received a relatively high number of medications. The number of medications was actually greater for many patients since inhalers and PRN (as needed) medications were not included in the total number of daily dosages calculated. No significant differences in age (t = 0.69, df = 74, p = .53), gender (Fisher exact test = 1.00), ethnicity (² = 0.57, df = 1, p = .75), diagnosis (² = 0.32, df = 1, p = .57), mean number of total medications (t = -0.27, df = 74, p = .79), total number of dosages consumed per day (t = -0.74, df = 74, p = .46), or medication adherence (F range = 0.002–0.010, df = 1,74, p range 0.91–0.97) were found between patients prescribed typical agents compared with those receiving atypical antipsychotics. The mean total days of adherence assessments conducted for antipsychotics, antihypertensives, antihyperlipidemics, and antidiabetics were 305 (SD = 81), 333 (SD = 78), 285 (SD = 87), and 332 (SD = 93), respectively (F = 3.01, df = 3,184, p = .032; no significant differences among individual agents using the Scheffe test).

The percentages of subjects who were receiving maintenance therapy (ie, prescribed the medication for at least 6 months before our measurement of adherence) for the four classes of medication were also calculated. There were no significant differences on this variable among the medication classes (range = 58% to 78% on maintenance therapy: ² = 3.86, df = 3, p = .28).

The types of antihypertensives for which adherence was analyzed were relatively evenly distributed among angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (33%, N = 20), ß-blockers (25%, N = 15), calcium channel blockers (20%, N = 12), and diuretics (22%, N = 13), whereas sulfonylureas (58%, N = 14) and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (71%, N = 20) were the primary medications included in diabetes and hyperlipidemia medication adherence analyses, respectively.

Adherence Rates
Figure 1 shows the 12-month CFR and CMGR results for antipsychotic, antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic agents, covaried for total days of adherence assessments. Twelve-month CFRs ranged from 52% to 64% across the four medication categories. Thus, patients filled their medications at appropriate intervals only slightly more than half of the time. Twelve-month CMGRs ranged from 5% to 15%, resulting in average gaps in therapy varying from 2 to 5 days per month. No significant differences were found among these medication groups in terms of CFR or CMGR at 12 months (F = 1.39, df = 3,184, p = .25 and F = 2.24, df = 3,184, p = .086, respectively) or 6 months (F = 0.94, df = 3,184, p = .42 and F = 1.56, df = 3,184, p = .20, respectively). No significant differences in adherence were found when adherence rates were compared by gender.

View larger version (47K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Twelve-month mean medication adherence rates. Bars show standard deviations. a, Proportion of total fills that are adherent among medications (F = 1.39, df = 3,184, p = .25). b, Number of days of medication that were unavailable for consumption (because of delayed refill) divided by the total number of days during the same interval among medications (F = 2.24, df = 3,184, p = .09).

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
This study revealed that adherence to nonpsychiatric medications in middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia or related disorders is problematic. Our hypothesis that patients prescribed atypical agents would have higher rates of adherence with nonpsychiatric medications compared with those receiving conventional agents was not proven because no differences in adherence were found. This suggests that nonadherence for nonpsychiatric agents is a problem despite the use of atypical agents. In addition, our hypothesis that nonadherence with antipsychotics would be greater than nonadherence with nonpsychiatric medications was also not proven because the rates of nonadherence for antipsychotic, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic agents were similar. Of note was the finding that none of the CFRs or CMGRs for the four medication classes were significantly correlated with one another. Although the small sample size makes such a finding preliminary, it does suggest that adherence to one medication does not guarantee adherence with another agent. As part of our secondary questions, we found that medication quantity (ie, total number of medications and the total number of dosages consumed per 24 hours) was significantly related to antipsychotic nonadherence, thus reinforcing the importance of simplifying medication regimens whenever possible in an attempt to improve adherence. We also did not find significant differences in antipsychotic adherence among patients prescribed typical vs. atypical agents; however, our limited sample size might have contributed to this lack of a significant difference. Our finding of no significant difference in adherence rates by gender is not surprising. Although definitive conclusions about the effect of gender on adherence cannot be made from this mostly male sample, previous examinations of gender as a risk factor for nonadherence (40–45) did not find it to be a significant factor.

To the best of our knowledge, our findings are unique in that we specifically examined adherence to nonpsychiatric medications in a sample of middle-aged and older patients with psychotic disorders. Similar results regarding nonadherence correlating to greater numbers of prescribed medications were reported in a sample of community-dwelling elderly patients with chronic medical disorders such as hypertension, osteoarthritis, and diabetes (46). In general, previous examinations of adherence to such medications as antihypertensives and other nonpsychiatric medications have tended to include medical patients and did not specifically address adherence in patients with psychiatric disorders (7–11, 47–50). The findings that nonadherence rates were not highly correlated with one another becomes logical in the context of the Health Belief Model. This model considers health behavior to be a result of the interplay among a number of construct factors, such as perceived susceptibility to illness, perceived severity of illness, perceived benefits of taking health action, perceived barriers to taking action, and cues to action (51–54). In this model patients determine their adherence behavior by weighing the perceived benefits and costs of each treatment, which may vary for different medications. For example, the side effect profile of an antipsychotic is different than that of an antihypertensive or antidiabetic agent. Furthermore, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are usually chronic, painless conditions perceived by the patient as having deleterious health consequences in the distant future (55), whereas schizophrenia has more immediately noticeable symptoms.

Appropriate measurement of medication adherence remains a fundamental issue when determining adherence. Presently, there is no single measure accepted as the "gold standard" because all the commonly employed methods have drawbacks (56). Patient interviews, while straightforward and inexpensive, are clearly limited by their subjective nature. Pill counts are frequently utilized, inexpensive, and can provide information about the number of pills taken; however, it is difficult to determine actual medication consumption, and patients can intentionally or unintentionally manipulate this measure. Electronic adherence monitors, while providing detailed information regarding medication administration, are expensive and do not measure actual medication consumption. Medication refill records provide unobtrusive information regarding refill histories and can be valuable in determining gaps in therapy, but this method, similar to pill counts and electronic monitors, is indirect and cannot confirm actual medication consumption. Blood and urine medication levels, while direct measures of adherence, may be unpopular with patients and can be manipulated (56).

Strengths of our study include the 12-month assessment period and use of objective definitions of adherence (CFR and CMGR) based on medication refill records. Steiner and Prochazka (38) reviewed the literature on the assessment of refill adherence using pharmacy records. From the 41 studies reviewed, the authors concluded that refill records are a useful source of adherence information when direct measurement of medication consumption is not feasible, such as in the current study. Applying identical adherence criteria to different classes of drugs can be problematic as it could be argued that different cutoffs for adherence exist among various medications. For this reason, we calculated adherence using both a dichotomous assessment (CFR) and a continuous measure (CMGR). The unobtrusive nature of obtaining pharmacy refill information to assess adherence allowed for a naturalistic estimation of adherence (56). Additionally, rates of adherence based on pharmacy refill records have been reported to correlate with other adherence behaviors (eg, appointment keeping), serum drug levels, and drug effects such as blood pressure control (57–60). Furthermore, although refill records provided only an indirect measure of adherence, they allowed us to calculate gaps in therapy (61), which demonstrated underuse of medications. Our decision to exclude patients who had likely received medical care outside the VA system increased the completeness of our pharmacy records. The very low cost of medications to patients in the VA system, at the time the study was conducted, minimized the effects of financial burden on refill rates. Thus, in our study setting, CFR and CMGR were probably the most useful practical measures of adherence.

In addition to the drawbacks with refill records that was previously discussed, we should also point out the limitations of this study. One of the limitations was the nonrandomized study design. We attempted to decrease selection bias by assessing everyone who met selection criteria. Furthermore, this investigation was an attempt to measure adherence in a naturalistic "real-world" setting. Because the study used a retrospective design, we were limited in our ability to measure and analyze potentially relevant factors such as medication efficacy, side effects, insight, medication supervision status, therapist alliance, or psychiatric hospitalization. Another limitation of this study was the small sample size. Finally, our results may not generalize to non-VA patients. Future studies should examine larger numbers of individuals and patients with other psychiatric disorders. Additional investigations should also compare nonpsychiatric medication adherence rates between a schizophrenic group and a nonpsychiatric group.

In summary, we found that adherence to antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, and antidiabetic agents was problematic in middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia or related disorders, even in those taking atypical agents. The long-term consequences of nonadherence to these classes of medications, in addition to antipsychotics, underscore the need to improve adherence for both psychiatric and nonpsychiatric medications in this population.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 
This work was supported in part by the National Institute of Mental Health, Grants MH19934, MH49671, MH43693, and MH59101, and by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Portions of this work were presented at the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry Annual Meeting in Orlando, Florida, February 24–26, 2002.

Received for publication December 5, 2001.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS REFERENCES

 

1. Terkelsen KG, Menikoff A. Measuring the costs of schizophrenia: implications for the post-institutional era in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 8: 199–222.[Medline]
2. Weiden PJ, Olfson M. Cost of relapse in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1995; 21: 419–29.
3. Fenton WS, Blyler CR, Heinssen RK. Determinants of medication compliance in schizophrenia: empirical and clinical findings. Schizophr Bull 1997; 23: 637–51.
4. Jeste DV, Gladsjo JA, Lindamer LA, Lacro JP. Medical comorbidity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1996; 22: 413–30.
5. Goldman LS. Medical illness in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60 (Suppl 21): 10–5.
6. Koranyi EK. Somatic illness in psychiatric patients. Psychosomatics 1980; 21: 887–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Cramer JA, Rosenheck R. Compliance with medication regimens for mental and physical disorders. Psychiatr Serv 1998; 49: 196–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Schwed A, Fallab CL, Burnier M, Waeber B, Kappenberger L, Burnand B, Darioli R. Electronic monitoring of compliance to lipid-lowering therapy in clinical practice. J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 39: 402–9.[Abstract]
9. Shobhana R, Begum R, Snehalatha C, Vijay V, Ramachandran A. Patients’ adherence to diabetes treatment. J Assoc Physicians India 1999; 47: 1173–5.[Medline]
10. Morris AD, Boyle DI, McMahon AD, Greene SA, MacDonald TM, Newton RW. Adherence to insulin treatment, glycaemic control, and ketoacidosis in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Lancet 1997; 350: 1505–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Lee JY, Kusek JW, Greene PG, Bernhard S, Norris K, Smith D, Wilkening B, Wright JT. Assessing medication adherence by pill count and electronic monitoring in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1996; 9: 719–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Hodgson TA, Cai L. Medical care expenditures for hypertension, its complications, and its comorbidities. Med Care 2001; 3: 846–57.
14. Blumenfeld JD. Renal and cardiac complications of hypertension. Clin Symp 1994; 46: 3–32.[Medline]
15. Froom J, Froom P, Benjamin M, Benjamin BJ. Measurement and management of hyperlipidemia for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease. J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11: 12–22.[Abstract]
16. Nicolucci A, Cavaliere D, Scorpiglione N, Carinci F, Capani F, Tognoni G, Benedetti MM. A comprehensive assessment of the avoidability of long-term complications of diabetes: a case-control study. Diabetes Care 2001; 19: 927–33.[Abstract]
17. Allebeck P, Wistedt B. Mortality in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986; 43: 650–3.[Abstract]
18. Koranyi EK. Morbidity and rate of undiagnosed physical illnesses in a psychiatric clinic population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979; 36: 414–9.[Abstract]
19. Tsuang MT, Perkins K, Simpson JC. Physical diseases in schizophrenia and affective disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 1983; 44: 42–6.[Medline]
20. Deleted in proof.
21. Salzman C. Medication compliance in the elderly. J Clin Psychiatry 1995; 56 (Suppl 1): 18–22.
22. Arean PA. Cognitive behavioral therapy with older adults. Behav Ther 1993; 17: 236–9.
23. Caro JJ, Salas M, Speckman JL, Raggio G, Jackson JD. Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice. Can Med Assoc J 1999; 160: 31–7.[Abstract]
24. Rosenstock IM. Enhancing patients compliance with health recommendations. J Pediatr Health Care 1988; 2: 67–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
25. Sackett D, Haynes R, Gibson E, Taylor D, Roberts R, Johnson A. Patient compliance with antihypertensive regimens. Patient Counseling Health Educ 1978; 1: 18–21.
26. Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medications after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20: 1–11.
27. Eraker S, Kirscht J, Becker M. Understanding and improving patient compliance. Ann Intern Med 1994; 100: 258–68.
28. Mallion J, Baguet J, Siche J, Tremel F, De Gaudemaris R. Compliance, electronic monitoring and antihypertensive drugs. J Hypertens 1998; 16 (Suppl 1): S75–9.
29. Shepherd J. Tomorrow’s world: atherosclerosis in the year 2000. Neth J Med 1997; 50: 221–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Sung JCY, Nichol MB, Venturini F, Bailey KL, McCombs JS, Cody M. Factors affecting patient compliance with antihyperlipidemic medications in a HMO population. Am J Managed Care 1998; 4: 1421–30.[Medline]
31. Dolder CR, Lacro JP, Jeste DV. Medication adherence: is there a difference between typical and atypical antipsychotics? Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 103–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rosenheck R, Chang S, Choe Y, Cramer J, Xu W, Thomas J, Henderson W, Charney D. Medication continuation and compliance: a comparison of patients treated with clozapine and haloperidol. J Clin Psychiatry 2000; 61: 382–6.[Medline]
33. Olfson M, Mechanic D, Hansell S, Boyer CA, Walkup J, Weiden PJ. Predicting medication noncompliance after hospital discharge among patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2000; 51: 216–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Fleischhacker WW. Clozapine: a comparison with other novel antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60 (Suppl 12): 30–4.
35. Meltzer HY, McGurk SR. The effects of clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine on cognitive function in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1999; 25: 233–55.
36. Purdon SE. Cognitive improvement in schizophrenia with novel antipsychotic medications. Schizophr Res 1999; 35: S51–60.
37. Kane JM. Pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1999; 46: 1396–408.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 105–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
39. Hamilton RA, Briceland LL. Use of prescription-refill records to assess patient compliance. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49: 1691–6.[Abstract]
40. Duncan JC, Rogers R. Medication compliance in patients with chronic schizophrenia: implications for the community management of mentally disordered offenders. J Forensic Sci 1998; 43: 1133–7.[Medline]
41. Agarwal MR, Sharma VK, Kumar K, Lowe D. Non-compliance with treatment in patients suffering from schizophrenia: a study to evaluate possible contributing factors. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1998; 44: 92–106.
42. Buchanan RW, Kirkpatrick B, Summerfelt A, Hanlon TE, Levine J, Carpenter WT Jr. Clinical predictors of relapse following neuroleptic withdrawal. Biol Psychiatry 1992; 32: 72–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
43. Grunebaum MF, Weiden PJ, Olfson M. Medication supervision and adherence of persons with psychotic disorders in residential treatment settings: a pilot study. J Clin Psychiatry 2001; 62: 394–9.[Medline]
44. Nageotte C, Sullivan G, Duan N, Camp PL. Medication compliance among the seriously mentally ill in a public mental health system. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1997; 32: 49–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Pan PC, Tantam D. Clinical characteristics, health beliefs and compliance with maintenance treatment: a comparison between regular and irregular attenders at a depot clinic. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1989; 79: 564–70.[Medline]
46. Murray MD, Darnell J, Weinberger M, Martz BL. Factors contributing to medication noncompliance in elderly public housing tenants. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1986; 20: 146–52.[Abstract]
47. Burris JF, Papademetriou V, Wallin JD, Cook ME, Weidler DJ. Therapeutic adherence in the elderly: transdermal clonidine compared to oral verapamil for hypertension. Am J Med 1999; 91: 22S–8S.
48. Feldman R, Bacher M, Campbell N, Drover A, Chockalingam A. Adherence to pharmacologic management of hypertension. Can J Public Health 1998; 89: I16–8.[Medline]
49. Svensson S, Kjellgren KI, Ahlner J, Saljo R. Reasons for adherence with antihypertensive medication. Int J Cardiol 2000; 76: 157–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
50. Mansur AP, Mattar AP, Tsubo CE, Simao DT, Yoshi FR, Daci K. Prescription and adherence to statins of patients with coronary artery disease and hypercholesterolemia. Arq Bras Cardiol 2001; 76: 111–8.[Medline]
51. Kelly GR. Utility of the health belief model in examining medication compliance among psychiatric outpatients. Soc Sci Med 1987; 25: 1205–11.
52. Perkins DO. Adherence to antipsychotic medications. J Clin Psychiatry 1999; 60 (Suppl 21): 25–30.
53. Weiden P, Rapkin B, Mott T, Zygmunt A, Goldman D, Horvitz-Lennon M, Frances A. Rating of Medication Influences (ROMI) Scale in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1994; 20: 297–310.
54. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q 1984; 11: 1–47.[Medline]
55. Larosa JH, Larosa JC. Enhancing drug compliance in lipid-lowering treatment. Arch Fam Med 2001; 9: 1169–75.
56. Vitolins MZ, Rand CS, Rapp SR, Ribisl PM, Sevick MA. Measuring adherence to behavioral and medical interventions. Controlled Clin Trials 2000; 21: 188S–94S.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Deyo RA, Inui TS, Sullivan B. Noncompliance with arthritis drugs: magnitude, correlates, and clinical implications. J Rheumatol 1981; 8: 931–6.[Medline]
58. Peterson GM, McLean S, Millingen KS. Determinants of patient compliance with anticonvulsant therapy. Epilepsia 1982; 23: 607–13.[Medline]
59. Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Med Care 1988; 26: 814–23.[Medline]
60. Steiner JF, Fihn SD, Blair B, Inui TS. Appropriate reductions in compliance among well-controlled hypertensive patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1991; 44: 1361–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
61. Choo PW, Rand CS, Inui TS, Lee ML, Cain E, Cordeiro-Breault M, Canning C, Platt R. Validations of patients reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. Med Care 1999; 37: 846–57.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Weiss, D. C. Henderson, J. B. Weilburg, D. C. Goff, J. B. Meigs, E. Cagliero, and R. W. Grant Treatment of Cardiac Risk Factors Among Patients With Schizophrenia and Diabetes Psychiatr Serv, August 1, 2006; 57(8): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R. Dolder, K. Furtek, J. P. Lacro, and D. V. Jeste Antihypertensive Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Psychotic Disorders Compared to Persons Without Psychiatric Illness Psychosomatics, April 1, 2005; 46(2): 135 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Figures Only Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dolder, C. R. Articles by Jeste, D. V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dolder, C. R. Articles by Jeste, D. V. Related Collections Blood Pressure Psychosis Therapeutic Interventions