| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From Douglas Hospital Research Center (M.P., J.C.P., S.J.L.), McGill University, and McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (M.P., J.C.P.), Montréal Neurological Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Canada; and the Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research (M.P., D.H.H.), University of Trier, Trier, Germany.
Address reprint requests to: Marita Pruessner, MSc, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montréal Neurological Institute, 3801 University St., Suite Webster 2B, Montréal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada. Email: marita{at}bic.mni.mcgill.ca
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
METHODS: We assessed the severity of depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depression Inventory and chronic and acute stress perception in 40 healthy young men. Once a week, for 4 consecutive weeks, subjects provided saliva samples collected at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after awakening.
RESULTS: Higher levels of depressive symptomatology were associated with a greater cortisol response after awakening. This association seemed to be stronger when only subjects in the nonclinical range of depression were included. Furthermore, cortisol levels and depressive symptomatology were significantly positively correlated with measures of chronic and acute stress perception.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study extends earlier findings of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity in clinical depression to healthy young men with mild levels of depressive symptomatology. Measuring the cortisol response to awakening is proposed as an economical alternative to traditional approaches for determining basal hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity. Associations between depressive symptomatology and chronic stress, as well as implications for future studies, are discussed.
Key Words: depression mood chronic stress hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis salivary cortisol awakening response.
Abbreviations: ANOVA = analysis of variance; DSM-III-R = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edition revised; HDI = Hamilton Depression Inventory; HPA = hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis; TICS = Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress; CRF = corticotropin-releasing factor.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Traditionally cortisol secretion in depression or negative mood is determined as a diurnal profile in plasma (1621) or urine (2224). Only a few studies have used saliva samples (2527). Some investigators have reported an association between depressive symptomatology and elevated cortisol levels especially in the morning hours (17, 21, 24, 26), whereas others have concluded that the evening cortisol levels show the highest association with depression (28).
In recent years the observation of a pronounced cortisol response to awakening (2931) has triggered a series of studies testing the usefulness of that marker to determine basal HPA regulation. Cortisol levels in saliva with strict reference to the time of awakening increased by 50% to 70% during the first 30 minutes and showed test-retest correlations (r) of 0.45 to 0.70 (32). These results clearly demonstrate higher intraindividual stability than single morning cortisol assessment or measurement at predefined times (32, 33). Several studies investigated the association of the cortisol response to awakening with psychological variables and found elevated cortisol levels 30 to 60 minutes after awakening in subjects with high levels of chronic stress during the past year (34, 35). In a similar way, perceived stress during the last month was correlated with increases of cortisol levels during the first hour after awakening after dexamethasone pretreatment (36). In contrast, a diagnosis of burnout (36) or chronic pain (37) was characterized by attenuated cortisol levels after awakening.
The above findings clearly encourage the measurement of salivary free cortisol after awakening to identify HPA hyperactivity in association with depression and negative mood. In a group of 40 healthy young men we assessed the relationship between self-reported depressive symptoms and the cortisol response to awakening and the association between depressive symptomatology and cortisol levels with measures of acute and chronic stress.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cortisol Assessment
Cortisol was assessed from saliva collected with the Salivette sampling device (Sarstedt, Rommelsdorf, Germany). This noninvasive technique can be used at home and interferes only minimally with normal daily routines. Cortisol in saliva reliably reflects the free (unbound) fraction of cortisol in plasma (39).
Subjects collected saliva once a week (Wednesday or Thursday) for 4 consecutive weeks at 0, 30, and 60 minutes after awakening in the morning. Awakening was either spontaneous or by alarm clock. Previous studies have shown that the cortisol response is not affected by this variable (32). Subjects were asked to refrain from drinking caffeinated beverages and smoking before saliva sampling. Furthermore, they were instructed not to brush their teeth before the end of the sampling time in the morning, not to eat or drink in the 10 minutes before sampling, and to rinse their mouth with water before sampling. All psychological testing and an acute stress rating were performed within the month after cortisol assessment. The individual time delay between cortisol and psychological assessment did not create any effects.
Psychological Assessment
Depressive symptomatology.
Depressive symptomatology was assessed with the Hamilton Depression Inventory (HDI) (40), a revised and extended self-report version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (41). The HDI consists of 23 items and serves as a measure of the severity of depressive symptoms. Subjects are asked to refer to their feelings and behavior during the past 2 weeks, which has become a standard on self-report measures of depression (40). According to the authors of the HDI, a cutoff score of 19 best distinguishes between nondepressed and clinically depressed persons rated with DSM-III-R criteria, whereas levels between 14 and 18.5 are regarded as subclinical and suggest a general level of psychological distress. The internal consistency reliability coefficient for the HDI is 0.93 (Cronbachs
), and the test-retest reliability coefficient is 0.95 (Pearson product moment correlation). Criterion-related validity of the HDI was proven by high correlations (r = 0.94, p < .001) with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale clinical interview; construct validity was demonstrated by strong correlations (r = 0.93, p < .001) with the Beck Depression Inventory.
Chronic and acute stress.
Subjective stress levels were assessed with an English version of the Trier Inventory for the Assessment of Chronic Stress (TICS) (42). The TICS is a 39-item self-report scale for the assessment of chronic stress. It consists of six scales: work overload, worries, social stress, lack of recognition, work discontent, and intrusive memories. Internal consistency coefficients for the six scales vary between 0.76 and 0.88. Subjects are asked to assess on a five-point rating scale how frequently they experienced specific stressful situations during the past year. As a measure of acute stress, subjects were asked to indicate their actual stress level on a 10-point rating scale with 1 being very low and 10 being very high.
Psychological, Endocrinological, and Statistical Analyses
The saliva samples were analyzed using a time-resolved immunoassay with fluorescence detection (43). The intra- and interassay variability was below 10% and 12%, respectively. One subject had to be excluded because of cortisol levels that were more than three standard deviations above the group mean. One subject obtained an HDI score of 36.5 (cutoff score was 19) and thus was referred to as potentially clinically depressed. Two subjects obtained a score of 19, and three subjects scored between 14 and 18.5, which corresponds to the subclinical range of depression. These subjects were excluded from analysis of the nonclinical range of depression.
To analyze the cortisol increase after awakening for the 4 sampling days, two-way within-subject ANOVAs were computed with repeated measures on the factors time (three levels) and day (four levels). To analyze the linear relationship between depressive symptoms or chronic stress and cortisol regulation, Pearson correlations were computed between the scores on the HDI and the TICS and the cortisol response after awakening. Pearson correlations were also calculated between HDI and TICS scores. Spearman rank correlations were used to determine associations between the 10-point rating scale for acute stress and HDI scores as well as cortisol levels. For all correlational analysis, cortisol levels were transformed into a single value by calculating the area under the curve for each day and then computing the median from the four individual cortisol (day) values.
Because previous studies had shown that cortisol levels 30 and 60 minutes after awakening best differentiate between groups (34, 35), the impact of cortisol levels at different times after awakening was assessed. Therefore, groups of subjects with high and low depressive symptomatology and high and low stress levels were determined by median split and entered into two-way ANOVAs (group by time) as independent variables. For the individual cortisol levels during the 4 weeks, the median was calculated for each sampling time (0, 30, and 60 minutes after awakening). These aggregated levels served as dependent variables in the ANOVA. Significant interaction effects were specified by Newman-Keuls post hoc tests.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 = 0.21). Figure 1 illustrates the cortisol response after awakening for the three sampling times and four sampling days.
|
Pearson correlations between the total HDI score and the aggregated cortisol response after awakening showed a trend for significance (r = 0.30, p = .06) for the total group (N = 39). There seemed to be a stronger association (r = 0.34, p = .05) when subjects in the subclinical and clinical range of depression were excluded. Figure 2 shows the scatterplot between HDI score and the cortisol response after awakening for the nonclinical group.
|
7.5; high: >7.5). For the total group, an ANOVA (group by time) revealed a significantly higher cortisol response after awakening in subjects with high HDI scores (F(1,37) = 7.56, p < .01). The group-by-time interaction effect showed a trend to be significant (F(2,74) = 2.91, p = .06). Excluding all subjects in the subclinical and clinical range of depression still resulted in a significant group effect (F(1,31 = 7.26, p = .01). Moreover, a significant group-by-time interaction was observed (F(2,62) = 5.4, p = .007). Post hoc analysis revealed that the cortisol levels 30 and 60 minutes after awakening reflected the group differences best. Figure 3 shows the cortisol levels during the first hour after awakening for the total and nonclinical group in subjects with high and low scores on the HDI.
|
Next, associations between chronic stress and the cortisol response after awakening were investigated. Correlational analyses revealed a trend for a significant association between the total score on the TICS and cortisol after awakening (area under the curve, median for 4 weeks: r = 0.31, p < .06). The only subscale that demonstrated a significant association with cortisol was work overload (r = 0.37, p = .02). However, after correcting for the number of comparisons, the result failed to remain significant.
Separating the group by median split according to the subjects total score on the stress scale, a two-way ANOVA showed no main effect for the factor group but revealed a significant group-by-time interaction effect (F(2,74) = 3.78, p = .027). Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis revealed significant differences in the cortisol levels 30 minutes after awakening.
Assigning subjects to groups with high and low levels on each of the six subscales again revealed no main effect on cortisol for the factor group. However, for the scale work overload, a significant interaction effect was shown (F(2,74) = 6.78, p = .002); this effect was still significant after adjustment of the significance level according to the number of comparisons. Post hoc analysis revealed significant differences in the cortisol levels at the time of awakening and 30 minutes thereafter. Figure 4 shows the cortisol levels after awakening in the groups with high and low total scores on the TICS and in the groups with high and low scores for work overload.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Third, cortisol regulation was assessed during 1 hour in the morning with strict reference to the time of awakening. We propose that this method has several advantages compared with traditional approaches determining cortisol regulation. Diurnal assessments of cortisol secretion in depressed patients and control subjects (1621) led to inconsistent results concerning the time of day that best differentiates between groups. Whereas measurement of cortisol levels at predefined times underlies large inter- and intraindividual variation (33), cortisol sampling during the first hour in the morning with strict reference to the time of awakening seems to produce more reliable results (32). Moreover, determining early morning free cortisol in saliva is noninvasive, less time consuming than diurnal sampling, and can be done at home without disturbing individual morning habits.
It was intriguing to find group differences in the cortisol response to awakening already in the nonclinical range of depression. When we included subjects with more severe depressive symptoms according to the HDI, the association with cortisol was less clear than for the nonclinical group alone. The common finding that only a small proportion of clinically depressed subjects reacts with cortisol nonsuppression to the dexamethasone suppression test (6, 7) suggests that clinical depression is characterized by an increased variability of cortisol levels and that additional mechanisms might have an impact on HPA regulation.
Previous reports describing a significant relation between measures of stress and early morning free cortisol (3436) could be confirmed and extended in the current study. Consistent with the results by Schulz et al. (34), the present study reports significantly higher cortisol levels after awakening in subjects with high work overload. Moreover, we observed a significant cortisol difference between subjects with high and low total TICS scores 30 minutes after awakening, a finding that has not been reported before. Differences between our results and those of a previous study in which associations between other TICS subscales and cortisol were found (35) might be explained by the smaller sample size and the restriction to male subjects in the present study. Furthermore, the median cortisol level during a period of 4 weeks (assessed in this study) is expected to better represent baseline HPA activity than measurement on a single day.
Interestingly, the highest correlations of the cortisol response after awakening were found with a 10-point rating scale assessing momentary feelings of stress. Although a simple statement about the level of acute stress is rather unspecific and should not be overinterpreted, this finding points to the relevance of actual mood variations in determining cortisol differences. The observed correlation between measures of chronic stress and depressive symptomatology confirms similar evidence from other studies (4750). The association between the acute stress measure and the HDI score was even stronger. It can be argued that the time frame both scales are referring to is overlapping. Thus, the acute stress measure might have better reflected the subjects actual situation than the TICS, which is referring to the past year.
We can only speculate about the causal relationship between stress, depression, and elevated cortisol levels, but a mediating role of life stressors for the development of depressive illness has been suggested (51, 52). The underlying dysregulations of the HPA axis in depression and chronic stress states seem to follow a similar pattern. Both conditions are characterized by increases in cortisol secretion, and in both conditions, increased central drive, impaired glucocorticoid feedback, and hypertrophy of the adrenal gland have been observed (3, 4). The consistent coappearance of hypercortisolism and depression led several authors to suggest that elevated cortisol levels cause depressive symptoms (1, 53, 54). Additional evidence for such a relationship comes from studies reporting that depressive symptomatology seems to be reversible by antiglucocorticoid therapy and antidepressant actions on HPA regulation (1, 4, 5557).
Future studies still need to compare the usefulness of measuring the cortisol response to awakening with traditional approaches to assess HPA dysregulations. It will be particularly interesting to investigate if the proposed method is applicable for patients with clinical depression. Furthermore, subsequent studies should include more detailed questionnaires assessing the association between acute stress perception and the cortisol response to awakening. In light of the higher prevalence of depressive symptomatology in women (58), it would also be interesting to include both genders in similar investigations in the future.
Received for publication May 17, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Vreeburg, W. J. G. Hoogendijk, J. van Pelt, R. H. DeRijk, J. C. M. Verhagen, R. van Dyck, J. H. Smit, F. G. Zitman, and B. W. J. H. Penninx Major Depressive Disorder and Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activity: Results From a Large Cohort Study Arch Gen Psychiatry, June 1, 2009; 66(6): 617 - 626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liston, B. S. McEwen, and B. J. Casey Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control PNAS, January 20, 2009; 106(3): 912 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Molloy, L. Perkins-Porras, P. C. Strike, and A. Steptoe Type-D Personality and Cortisol in Survivors of Acute Coronary Syndrome Psychosom Med, October 1, 2008; 70(8): 863 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. M. Nater, E. Maloney, R. S. Boneva, B. M. Gurbaxani, J.-M. Lin, J. F. Jones, W. C. Reeves, and C. Heim Attenuated Morning Salivary Cortisol Concentrations in a Population-Based Study of Persons with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Well Controls J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 703 - 709. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Kneipp, D. P. Welch, C. E. Wood, C. B. Yucha, and H. Yarandi Psychosocial and Physiological Stress Among Women Leaving Welfare West J Nurs Res, November 1, 2007; 29(7): 864 - 883. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. N. Mannie, C. J. Harmer, and P. J. Cowen Increased Waking Salivary Cortisol Levels in Young People at Familial Risk of Depression Am J Psychiatry, April 1, 2007; 164(4): 617 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Golden, S. Malhotra, G. S. Wand, F. L. Brancati, D. Ford, and K. Horton Adrenal Gland Volume and Dexamethasone-Suppressed Cortisol Correlate with Total Daily Salivary Cortisol in African-American Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1358 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Adam, L. C. Hawkley, B. M. Kudielka, and J. T. Cacioppo Day-to-day dynamics of experience-cortisol associations in a population-based sample of older adults PNAS, November 7, 2006; 103(45): 17058 - 17063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Cohen, J. E. Schwartz, E. Epel, C. Kirschbaum, S. Sidney, and T. Seeman Socioeconomic Status, Race, and Diurnal Cortisol Decline in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 41 - 50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Heinrichs, D. Wagner, W. Schoch, L. M. Soravia, D. H. Hellhammer, and U. Ehlert Predicting Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms From Pretraumatic Risk Factors: A 2-Year Prospective Follow-Up Study in Firefighters Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 162(12): 2276 - 2286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Steptoe, L. Brydon, and S. Kunz-Ebrecht Changes in Financial Strain Over Three Years, Ambulatory Blood Pressure, and Cortisol Responses to Awakening Psychosom Med, March 1, 2005; 67(2): 281 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Steptoe, J. Siegrist, C. Kirschbaum, and M. Marmot Effort--Reward Imbalance, Overcommitment, and Measures of Cortisol and Blood Pressure Over the Working Day Psychosom Med, May 1, 2004; 66(3): 323 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |