Psychosomatic Medicine Faster Service from Outside North America
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Class
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Musculoskeletal
Right arrow Other Psychiatric Disorders
Psychosomatic Medicine 65:896-901 (2003)
© 2003 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Chronic Fatigue and Sociodemographic Characteristics as Predictors of Psychiatric Disorders in a Community-based Sample

Renee R. Taylor, PhD, Leonard A. Jason, PhD and Susan C. Jahn, BS

From the University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL (R.R.T.); DePaul University, Chicago, IL (L.A.J.); and the Finch University of the Health Sciences/Chicago Medical School, Chicago, IL (S.C.J.).

Address reprint requests to: Renee R. Taylor, PhD, Department of Occupational Therapy (MC 811), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1919 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL. E-mail: rtaylor{at}uic.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
OBJECTIVES: To explore the roles of chronic fatigue and sociodemographic characteristics (eg, parental status, work status, socioeconomic status, sex, age, marital status, and ethnicity) as predictors of psychiatric disorders.

METHODS: A stratified random sample of 18,675 adults residing in diverse neighborhoods in Chicago completed a telephone-screening questionnaire. A control group without chronic fatigue (N = 74) and a group of individuals with chronic fatigue (N = 227) were identified and administered a semi-structured psychiatric interview. Stepwise logistic regression analyses predicting occurrence of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders according to chronic fatigue status and sociodemographics were conducted on this overall sample of 301 participants.

RESULTS: Chronic fatigue, low socioeconomic status, and unemployment were among significant predictors of overall Axis I psychiatric disorders. Chronic fatigue functioned as a predictor for mood and anxiety disorders (including posttraumatic stress disorder), but did not function as a predictor for somatoform disorders, substance abuse/dependence, and eating disorders. Low socioeconomic status and unemployment were significantly associated with current psychiatric disorder, and low socioeconomic status was also significantly associated with mood and anxiety disorders. Women were significantly more likely to experience mood disorder, and minorities (eg, African Americans, Latinos, and individuals of other ethnicity) were significantly more likely to report posttraumatic stress disorder.

CONCLUSIONS: Results support prior findings for increased rates of psychiatric disorder among individuals with chronic fatigue and highlight the roles of low socioeconomic status, unemployment, being a woman, and being classified as a minority in their association with certain psychiatric disorders.

Key Words: chronic fatigue, • sociodemographic, • community-based sample, • epidemiology.

Abbreviations: CFS = chronic fatigue syndrome;; SCID = The Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Fatigue is a significant problem in health care within the United States and internationally (1). In 8.5 to 18% of primary care cases, fatigue has been known to persist beyond 6 months and has thus been labeled as "chronic fatigue" (2). Chronic fatigue is a prominent feature of a number of medical and psychiatric illnesses, such as Multiple Sclerosis, Lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), mood disorders, and anxiety disorders. Due to its multidimensionality, the relationship between chronic fatigue and psychiatric illness has generated significant interest in recent years. A preponderance of research on medical facility samples has established that individuals with chronic fatigue tend to receive higher rates of psychiatric diagnosis than control subjects without fatigue (3, 4). Other reports demonstrate that psychiatric variables do not play a primary role in the development and course of chronic fatigue (2,5).

In terms of specific diagnoses, a number of studies have found a significant positive association between chronic fatigue and depressive and anxiety disorders (6–8). While findings regarding a positive relationship between chronic fatigue and anxiety disorders have been relatively consistent, there has been some discrepancy in findings regarding the significance of the role of chronic fatigue in the diagnosis of depression (9, 10). Moreover, the relationship of other psychiatric diagnoses to chronic fatigue has not been given equivalent attention within the research community.

A primary explanation for the abundance of discrepant findings regarding psychiatric comorbidity in chronic fatigue involves the predominant use of nonrandom sampling procedures to select study participants (11). Most studies have relied on medical facility populations to conduct research in this area (12). Katon and Walker (13) illustrated that nonrandom sampling can lead to discrepant rates of psychiatric comorbidity through their observation that the relationship between fatigue and psychiatric comorbidity changes according to the type of population sampled. Comorbidity was strongest in tertiary care medical populations, less strong in primary care populations, and weakest in community-based populations.

Reliance on medical care samples is problematic not only because individuals differ in their level of access to health care and in their help-seeking behaviors, but also because medical care samples tend to be limited with respect to ethnic and socioeconomic diversity (3). The role of sociodemographic variables such as these is important to explore, because individuals of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds have been found to differ with respect to a number of issues including: health care practices (eg, nutrition, regular exercise, routine medical examinations); behavioral risk factors (eg, use of alcohol, drugs, and tobacco); access to adequate health care (eg, health insurance benefits and adequacy of care provided); level of psychosocial stress; amount of negative environmental exposures (eg, air pollution, lead, and other toxins); and level of hazard with respect to occupation (14–16).

In sum, little is known about the relationships between psychiatric disorder, chronic fatigue, and sociodemographic characteristics, such as parental status (children vs. no children), work status, socioeconomic status (education and occupation), sex, age, marital status, and ethnicity, within a diverse urban community-based population. Moreover, discrepancies in rates of psychiatric comorbidity between studies remain, and continued investigation of this issue using nonrandom medical facility samples biased by health care access and utilization patterns is frequently criticized (3). To reduce some of these prior limitations, the present study explored these relationships in a randomly selected, community-based sample of adults residing in diverse neighborhoods of Chicago. It was expected that individuals with chronic fatigue and those with fewer resources (ie, lower socioeconomic status and being unemployed) would demonstrate higher overall rates of current and lifetime psychiatric disorders as compared with control subjects.

Even less is known about the role of sociodemographic variables in the relationship between chronic fatigue and specific types of psychiatric disorders within an urban context. For example, is being a woman related to increased rates of mood disorders among individuals with chronic fatigue, or is this finding an artifact of increased health care utilization patterns among women (4)? A secondary objective of this study was to examine the differing roles of chronic fatigue and sociodemographic characteristics in relation to specific psychiatric disorders. This may help clarify previous discrepancies in findings regarding the role of chronic fatigue in specific psychiatric disorders. Consistent with the literature on this topic, an association between chronic fatigue and mood and anxiety disorders was predicted. In addition to chronic fatigue status, being a woman was also predicted to be associated with having an increased rate of mood disorder in this study.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Procedure
The data derive from a large-scale multi-stage, community-based study investigating the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) (17). Although data used in the present study derive from this larger study, the present study differs in that it is not an investigation of CFS prevalence. Rather, it is an investigation of psychiatric comorbidity in a more general sample of individuals with chronic fatigue as compared with controls without chronic fatigue.

In Stage 1, we called a random sample of residential/working telephone numbers and screened respondents for chronic fatigue symptomatology. Procedures developed by Kish (18) were used to select one adult from each household to receive the telephone-screening questionnaire. The randomized telephone numbers were obtained from Survey Sampling Incorporated (details of the procedure are presented elsewhere, in (19)). The sample was stratified to represent a population living on the Southwest Side of Chicago and 8 additional community areas within Chicago, each containing residents from diverse ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds. Based on estimates from the Geographic Information System software, the demographic breakdown of the combination of all areas sampled was approximately 43% African American, 24% Latin American (predominantly Mexican American and Puerto Rican American), and 33% White. In terms of income, 30% were estimated to be below the United States census poverty level and 15% were estimated to earn over $30,000 a year.

Individuals who indicated on the survey that they were experiencing severe fatigue, extreme tiredness, or exhaustion that was present for a period of 6 months or longer and the concurrent occurrence of four or more physical and cognitive symptoms (20), were defined as the chronic fatigue group. The control group was composed of individuals selected randomly from those who screened negative for chronic fatigue.

Those in the chronic fatigue and control groups were then invited to participate in Stage 2. In this stage, respondents received a semi-structured psychiatric interview to evaluate for the presence of DSM-IV, Axis I psychiatric disorders.

Participants
In Stage 1, we called 28,673 residential/working telephone numbers, and 18,675 adults (65.1%) were screened by phone for chronic fatigue symptomatology. This is a rather conservative response rate, as it includes households where an answering machine was reached. If we only included those residential/working numbers in which we reached an eligible household (N = 24,953) and we did not count answering machines, the completion rate would be 74.8%.

Of the 408 participants who screened positive based on the telephone survey, 227 (55.6%) agreed to participate in a semi-structured psychiatric interview. There were no significant differences on sociodemographic characteristics or fatigue severity scores between those 227 screened positive individuals who agreed to participate in the psychiatric interview, and the 181 screened positive individuals who declined to participate. The control group was composed of individuals selected randomly from the 18,260 screened negative participants. Of the 199 screened negative participants, 74 (37.2%) agreed to complete the psychiatric interview. There were no significant differences on sociodemographic characteristics or fatigue severity scores between the 74 screened negatives who agreed to participate and the 125 who declined. Participants declining participation in the psychiatric interview did so for a variety of reasons, the major reasons being unwillingness to dedicate the time required for the interview and reluctance to disclose information of a personal and psychological nature. Together, the chronic fatigue and control groups comprised a total sample of 301 participants.

Measures
The CFS Screening Questionnaire (21) was used in Stage 1 to select participants with chronic fatigue symptomatology and controls. This questionnaire has been found to be a valid and reliable measure that correctly discriminates individuals with various forms of chronic fatigue from those without it (21). It assessed whether each respondent was currently experiencing unexplained, severe fatigue for 6 or more months, and it included a checklist of diagnostic items from all three of the currently used definitions of CFS (20, 22, 23). These items included somatic complaints, such as sore throat, painful lymph nodes, and multi-joint pain. Sociodemographic characteristics assessed by this questionnaire included information on parental status (children vs. no children), work status, socioeconomic status, sex, age, marital status, and ethnicity. Hollingshead’s (24) scoring scale was used to classify socioeconomic status, and explicit definitions were provided to incorporate the variables of occupation and education. Continuous scores from this scale ranging from 5 to 54 were used to define socioeconomic status according to the following categories: low (5–14), low-middle (15–24), middle (25–34), middle–high (35–44), and high (45–54). The screening questionnaire took approximately 15 to 20 minutes to administer by phone.

The Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID) (25), administered in Stage 2, is a valid and reliable semi-structured interview guide that approximates a traditional psychiatric interview. It has been used reliably by a number of researchers investigating rates of psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (22, 26, 27). The SCID begins with a semi-structured interview portion designed to yield a tentative diagnosis. This tentative diagnosis is then systematically assessed during the structured portion of the interview via embedded questions that conform to exact, Axis I criteria set forth by the DSM-IV. The SCID is designed to yield current and lifetime (at least one diagnosis at any time during an individual’s lifetime) diagnoses. In the present study, the SCID was administered by phone during a single session lasting 45 minutes to 1 hour. Other researchers have reliably used telephones to collect psychiatric data within the general population (28), and have successfully administered the SCID by telephone to individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome (27). Because valid administration of the SCID required the interviewer to possess strong clinical and diagnostic skills (29), Master’s level psychology clinicians were trained extensively in SCID administration, viewed SCID training tapes, and were monitored while conducting mock as well as actual study interviews. Following training, clinicians were supervised weekly by a licensed clinical psychologist. A Spanish version of the SCID was administered to Spanish-speaking participants by bilingual, Master’s level psychology clinicians (29).

Data Analysis
Forward stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed using the SPSS for Windows 9.0 REGRESSION (BINARY LOGISTIC) procedure. The forward stepwise procedure was chosen as the variable selection method because it examines the independent variables at each step for entry or removal from the regression equation based on specific entry criteria. Wald criteria were used to judge the statistical significance of predictors. These regression analyses were employed to determine whether chronic fatigue status (chronic fatigue vs. control) and any of the sociodemographic variables predicted differences in rates of the following psychiatric diagnoses, which served as the dependent variables in each of the analyses: a) all current Axis I psychiatric disorders; b) all lifetime Axis I psychiatric disorders; c) current mood disorders; d) lifetime mood disorders; e) current anxiety disorders; f) lifetime anxiety disorders; g) current posttraumatic stress disorder; h) lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder; i) somatoform disorders (current only); j) current substance abuse/dependence; k) lifetime substance abuse/dependence; l) current eating disorders; and m) lifetime eating disorders. Chronic fatigue status and all sociodemographic variables presented in Table 1 were loaded into the same model for each regression analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Sociodemographic data (N = 301)*
 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. Chi-square analyses revealed that members of the experimental group differed significantly from members of the control group on all variables examined. Individuals in the chronic fatigue group were significantly more likely to have children than controls. Significantly fewer in the chronic fatigue group were working full time, and significantly more were working part time, unemployed, on disability, or retired when compared with controls. Significantly more individuals in the chronic fatigue group were of low, low-middle, or middle socioeconomic status, whereas more controls were of middle-high or high socioeconomic status. There were significantly more women in the chronic fatigue group and significantly more men in the control group. Individuals in the control group tended to be younger than individuals in the chronic fatigue group and control subjects were more likely to have never been married than individuals in the chronic fatigue group. Individuals in the chronic fatigue group were more likely to be divorced, widowed, or separated. Individuals in the control group were more likely to identify as White (non-Latino), whereas those in the chronic fatigue group were more likely to identify as Latino.

Current and Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnoses
Consistent with what was predicted, results of the first stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that chronic fatigue status and socioeconomic status were significant predictors of current psychiatric diagnosis. Participants with chronic fatigue exhibited significantly higher rates of current psychiatric diagnosis than controls (66% vs. 27%) [b = 1.57, OR = 4.79, 95% CI = 2.46 to 9.32, p < .01]. In addition, participants of low (71%) [b = 1.24, OR = 3.47, 95% CI = 1.10 to 10.97, p < .05] and low-middle (75%) [b = 1.55, OR = 4.73, 95% CI = 1.35 to 16.51, p < .05] socioeconomic status exhibited significantly higher rates of current psychiatric diagnosis than individuals of high (30%) socioeconomic status. The remaining social-demographic variables did not make significant contributions to the model.

Results of the second logistic regression analysis indicated that chronic fatigue status [b = 1.69, OR = 5.40, 95% CI = 2.91 to 10.02, p < .01] and work status [b = 1.41, OR = 4.10, 95% CI = 1.34 to 12.56, p < .05] were the only significant predictors of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Consistent with what was predicted, participants with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis than controls (83% vs. 50%). In addition, unemployed individuals demonstrated significantly higher rates of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis than individuals working full time (92% vs. 69%).

Specific Psychiatric Diagnoses1
To test relationships between chronic fatigue status, sociodemographic characteristics, and specific current and lifetime psychiatric disorders, a series of additional stepwise logistic regression analyses were conducted according to the procedures described previously. Consistent with the literature on this topic, the predicted association between chronic fatigue and mood and anxiety disorders was found. As predicted, being a woman was also found to be associated with having an increased rate of mood disorder. For current mood disorders, findings indicated significantly higher diagnostic rates in the chronic fatigue group as compared with the control group (32% vs. 7%). In addition, a significantly greater number of individuals of low socioeconomic status reported a current mood disorder than those of high socioeconomic status (40% vs. 11%). A significantly greater number of women reported a current mood disorder than men (31% vs. 14%). With respect to lifetime mood disorders, participants with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of mood disorder than controls (60% vs. 22%) and women demonstrated significantly higher rates than men (55% vs. 39%).

In terms of current anxiety disorders (not including posttraumatic stress disorder), participants with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic rates than controls (29% vs. 10%), and a significantly greater number of individuals of low (49%) and middle-low (53%) socioeconomic status reported current anxiety disorders than individuals of high socioeconomic status (18%). Results were similar for lifetime anxiety disorders (not including posttraumatic stress disorder). Individuals with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of lifetime anxiety disorders than controls (36% vs. 15%), and individuals of low (62%) and middle-low (60%) socioeconomic status exhibited significantly higher rates than individuals of high socioeconomic status (18%). In addition, women demonstrated significantly higher rates of lifetime anxiety disorders than men (49% vs. 33%). Rates of posttraumatic stress disorder were examined separately, and findings indicated that participants with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of current posttraumatic stress disorder than controls (18% vs. 5%). In addition, participants identifying themselves as Latin American (25%) or Multiracial/Other (24%) exhibited significantly higher rates than participants identifying themselves as White (7%). With respect to lifetime posttraumatic stress disorder, individuals with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates than controls (25% vs. 7%), and African American (23%), Latin American (32%), and other (29%) ethnicities demonstrated significantly higher rates than Whites (10%).

Distinct from findings for mood and anxiety disorders, chronic fatigue status did not emerge as a significant predictor for somatoform disorders, substance abuse/dependence, or eating disorders. Sex emerged as the only significant predictor of lifetime substance abuse/dependence. Men (51%) demonstrated significantly higher rates than women (51% vs. 30%). There were no other significant sociodemographic predictors of any of these disorders.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
This study supports previous findings for increased rates of psychiatric disorder among individuals with chronic fatigue, and it is the first to explore relationships between sociodemographic characteristics, chronic fatigue, and psychiatric disorders in a randomly selected, diverse community-based sample. Consistent with what was expected, chronic fatigue status emerged as a significant predictor of both current and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses in the overall sample. Participants with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of current (66% vs. 27%) and lifetime (83% vs. 50%) psychiatric diagnoses than control subjects. Results for the chronic fatigue group are congruous with the findings of a majority of studies indicating elevated rates of psychiatric disorder in individuals with unexplained chronic fatigue (4, 26, 27, 30). Using various measures of psychiatric comorbidity, current psychiatric diagnoses have been reported to occur in other studies in 12.5% to 72% of individuals with chronic fatigue, and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses have been reported to occur in 24.5% to 86% (26, 27, 30).

In comparison with other studies, percentage rates of current and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses in the present study are in the high range, suggesting that the experience of chronic fatigue appears to be closely associated with the occurrence of psychiatric disorder. Prior investigations have demonstrated that certain subgroups of individuals with chronic fatigue and psychiatric comorbidity display neuroimmunological and neurochemical abnormalities on various tests of brain functioning (31–35). These abnormalities are reported to affect psychiatric functioning and are thought to be associated with overlapping cognitive abnormalities observed in many individuals with chronic fatigue (36). Furthermore, previous research suggests that some individuals with chronic fatigue not only experience multiple physical, interpersonal, occupational, and financial losses as a result of their illness, but also report a prior history of stressful life events, trauma, and early disruptions in object relations, depending on the individual (37–39).

Rates of psychiatric comorbidity were not only high in the chronic fatigue group, but they were also high in the control group. The rate of 50% lifetime psychiatric comorbidity among controls in this study is markedly higher than general community estimates for lifetime psychiatric disorder in individuals without fatigue, which range from 23.9% to 26.2% (40). These rates may be, in part, attributable to some self-selection issues operative in the identification of controls in this study. Another explanation for the high rates of psychiatric comorbidity in both groups may involve unidentified risk factors associated with living in urban Chicago. One study analyzing predictive mental health needs assessment models identified both individual (age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, and educational status) and neighborhood (neighborhood social rank, lifestyle, and urbanization) risks for mental illness (41). It is also possible that the extensive time and involvement required for participation in this study caused individuals with fewer psychiatric complaints, and/or reluctance to disclose psychiatric symptomatology, to decline participation, leaving more symptomatic individuals more willing to participate.

In addition to chronic fatigue status, findings indicated that low socioeconomic status significantly predicted current psychiatric disorder within the overall sample. These results are consistent with findings from other studies (42–44). In part, results may be attributable to the effects of increased psychosocial stress associated with the circumstance of poverty, and to a synergistic relationship between limited educational status and decreased opportunities for employment (42–44). These findings must be interpreted with care, however, because they can not be generalized to the overall population; the sample employed in this study was biased toward containing more individuals with chronic fatigue than control subjects.

In terms of specific diagnoses, individuals with chronic fatigue demonstrated significantly higher rates of current (32%) and lifetime (60%) mood disorders when compared with controls (7% for current, 22% for lifetime), and significantly higher rates of current (29%) and lifetime (36%) anxiety disorders when compared with controls (10% for current, 15% for lifetime). These findings are comparable with the results of previous investigations that have found close associations between chronic fatigue, mood disorders, and anxiety disorders (45). Sex emerged as a significant predictor of current mood disorders, with women (31% for current, 55% for lifetime) receiving higher diagnostic rates than men (14% for current, 39% for lifetime) in the overall sample. Previous research has demonstrated a higher prevalence of depressive disorders in women as compared with men (46), and may, in part, be explained by neurochemical differences between men and women (47) as well as social and behavioral differences (48). A recent study found that negative life events and chronic life difficulties were more prevalent in women, and these variables were associated with an increased prevalence of depression in women (48).

Socioeconomic status emerged as a significant predictor for current mood disorders, and for current and lifetime anxiety disorders, with lower socioeconomic status being significantly associated with the occurrence of these disorders as compared with high socioeconomic status in the overall sample. A number of variables might have contributed to these findings, including the possibility that individuals of lower socioeconomic status tend to have more limited access to health insurance and mental health services, thereby leaving these disorders untreated and hence more likely to persist or reoccur over time. Moreover, prior research suggests that individuals of lower socioeconomic status tend to experience more personal and environmental distress, while at the same time having fewer resources (41–44, 49) .

Additional analyses of current and lifetime rates of posttraumatic stress disorder revealed significantly higher diagnostic rates of both current (18%) and lifetime (25%) posttraumatic stress disorder in individuals with chronic fatigue as compared with control subjects (5% for current, 7% for lifetime). Other studies have found an association between significant life stressors and chronic health conditions, such as infections, fatigue, and chronic fatigue syndrome (37, 38). In addition, individuals identifying themselves as African American, Latino American, or other ethnic groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of posttraumatic stress disorder than individuals identifying themselves as White. Other investigations have found increased risk factors associated with traumatic events among African Americans and Latino Americans in the United States (14–16).

The methodology used in this study is somewhat unique. Two groups of individuals with and without chronic fatigue were identified from a larger sample of 18,675 individuals. Individuals with chronic fatigue were not matched with controls, and the relatively smaller number of control subjects limits the interpretation of results. For example, the smaller number of control subjects may have limited power in the analyses, particularly in the logistic regression models. Another limitation of this study is its uniform reliance on self-report for participant selection and measurement of psychiatric diagnosis. One problem inherent in using self-report for participant selection involves the increased risk for heterogeneity within the resulting sample. Although participants in the study self-reported as experiencing chronic fatigue of unexplained origin, a current medical evaluation is the only way to assure that the fatigue could not have been explained by an undetected disease process. In addition to this issue, conclusions regarding the role of physiological processes in differing outcomes related to psychiatric comorbidity could not be corroborated by pathophysiological evidence taken from medical examination. In addition, the ability to generalize findings from this study and conclusions involving the general population are limited in two ways. First, all findings involving sociodemographic predictors of psychiatric disorders in the overall sample must be interpreted within the context of a sample biased toward containing more individuals with chronic fatigue than control subjects. Second, because the data are cross-sectional and analyses were correlational, temporal conclusions regarding cause-effect relationships between fatigue, sociodemographic variables, and psychiatric disorders could not be made. A final limitation of this study involves potential bias imposed by response rates, which tended not to be high.

In summary, this study confirms previous findings that individuals with chronic fatigue are more likely to receive current and lifetime psychiatric diagnoses than control subjects, and that chronic fatigue is a significant predictor for mood and anxiety disorders. The finding for associations between chronic fatigue, mood, and anxiety disorders, including posttraumatic stress disorder, may have implications for the future study of common biopsychosocial pathways in the cause and treatment of these conditions. In addition, the present investigation reveals significant relationships between low socioeconomic status, unemployment, sex, ethnicity, and certain Axis I psychiatric diagnoses. Health care program planning would benefit from consideration of these variables in targeting the occurrence and perpetuation of psychiatric disorders and chronic fatigue in diverse urban communities.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Financial support for this study was provided by the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease Grant AI36295.


    NOTES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
1 Detailed findings from the regression analyses for this section are available from the first author. Back

Received for publication April 12, 2002.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. McDonald E, David AS, Pelosi AJ, Mann AH. Chronic fatigue in primary care attendees. Psychol Med 1993; 23: 987–98.[Medline]
  2. Pawlikowska T, Chalder T, Hirsch SR, Wallace P, Wright DJM, Wessely S. A population based study of fatigue and psychosocial distress. BMJ 1994; 30: 763–66.
  3. Friedberg F, Jason LA. Understanding Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1994.
  4. Wessely S, Chalder T, Hirsch S, Wallace P, Wright D. Psychological symptoms, somatic symptoms, and psychiatric disorder in chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome: A prospective study in the primary care setting. Am J Psychiatry 1996; 153: 1050–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cathebras PJ, Robbins JM, Kirmayer LJ, Hayton BC. Fatigue in primary care: Prevalence, psychiatric comorbidity, illness behavior, and outcome. J Gen Intern Med 1991; 7: 276–86.
  6. Chen MK. The epidemiology of self-perceived fatigue among adults. Prev Med 1986; 15: 74–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kroenke K, Wood DR, Mangelsdorff AD, Meier NJ, Powell JB. Chronic fatigue in primary care. JAMA 1988; 260: 929–34.[Abstract]
  8. Lindal E, Bergmann S, Thorlacius S, Stefansson JG. Anxiety disorders: a result of long-term chronic fatigue–the psychiatric characteristics of the sufferers of Iceland disease. Acta Neurol Scand 1997; 96: 158–62.[Medline]
  9. Fuhrer R, Wessely S. Fatigue in French primary care. Psychol Med 1995; 25: 895–905.[Medline]
  10. Zubieta JK, Engleberg NC, Yargic LI, Pande AC, Demitrack MA. Seasonal symptom variation in patients with chronic fatigue: Comparison with major mood disorders. J Psychiatr Res 1994; 29: 13–22.
  11. Jason LA, Richman JA, Friedberg F, Wagner L, Taylor R, Jordan KM. Politics, science, and the emergence of a new disease: The case of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Am Psychol 1997; 52: 973–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Manu P. Evaluation of patients with chronic fatigue. Prim Care Update 1994; 1: 126–29.
  13. Katon WJ, Walker, EA. The relationship of chronic fatigue to psychiatric illness in community, primary care and tertiary care samples. In: Bock GR and Whelan J, eds. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. New York: John Wiley; 1993: 193–211.
  14. Davis R. Racial differences in mortality: current trends and perspectives. In: Thomas GE, ed. Race and Ethnicity in America: Meeting the Challenge in the 21st Century 1995. Washington DC; Taylor & Francis: 115–126.
  15. Perez-Stable EJ, Marin G, VanOss-Marin B. Behavioral risk factors: a comparison of Latinos and non-Latino Whites in San Francisco. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 971–76.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ruiz P. Assessing, diagnosing, and treating culturally diverse individuals: a Hispanic perspective. Psychiatr Q 1995; 66: 329–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Jason LA, Richman JA, Rademaker AW, Jordan KM, Plioplys AV, Taylor RR, McCready W, Huang CF, Plioplys S. A community-based study of chronic fatigue syndrome. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 2129–37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kish L. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley; 1965.
  19. Jason LA, Jordan KM, Richman JA, Rademaker AW, Huang CF, McCready W, Shlaes J, King CP, Landis D, Torres S, Haney-Davis T, Frankenberry EL. A community-based study of prolonged fatigue and chronic fatigue. J Health Psychol 1999; 4: 9–26.[Abstract]
  20. Jason LA, Ropacki MT, Santoro NB, Richman JA, Heatherly W, Taylor R, Ferrari JR, Plioplys AV, Plioplys S, Rademaker A, Golding J. A screening instrument for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Reliability and validity. J Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 1997; 3: 39–59.
  21. Fukuda K, Strauss SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 1994; 121: 953–59.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lloyd AR, Hickie I, Boughton CR, Spencer O, Wakefield D. Prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome in an Australian population. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 522–28.[Medline]
  23. Sharpe MC, Archard LC, Banatvala JE, Borysiewicz LK, Clare AW, David A, Edwards RHT, Hawton KEH, Lambert HP, Lane RJM, McDonald EM, Mowbray JF, Pearson DJ, Peto TEA, Preedy VR, Smith AP, Smith DG, Taylor DJ, Tyrrell DAJ, Wessely S, White PD. A report–chronic fatigue syndrome: Guidelines for research. J Royal Soc Med 1991; 84: 118–21.[Medline]
  24. Hollingshead AB. Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, available from Department of Sociology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1974.
  25. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV–Non-Patient Edition (SCID-NP, Version 2.0). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press 1995.
  26. Hickie I, Lloyd A, Wakefield D, Parker G. The psychiatric status of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 156: 534–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Taylor R, Jason LA. Comparing, the DIS with the SCID: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and psychiatric comorbidity. Psychol and Health : An International Journal 1998; 13: 1087–1104.
  28. Wells KB, Golding JM, Burnam MA. Psychiatric disorder and limitations in physical functioning in a sample of the Los Angeles general population. Am J Psychiatry 1988; 145: 712–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Williams DR, Gibbon M, First MB, Spitzer RL, Davies M, Borus J, Howes MJ, Kane J, Pope HG, Rounsaville B, Wittchen HU. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): II. Multisite test-retest reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992; 49: 630–36.[Abstract]
  30. Wood GC, Bentall RP, Gopfert M, Edwards RHT. A comparative psychiatric assessment of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and muscle disease. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 619–28.[Medline]
  31. Bell DS. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome update: Findings now point to CNS involvement. Postgrad Med 1994; 96: 73–81.
  32. Boda WL. Gait abnormalities in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Neurol Sci 1995; 131: 156–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Demitrack, M. A. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. A disease of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis? Ann Intern Med 1994; 26: 1–5.
  34. Donati F, Fagioli L, Komaroff AL, Duffy FH. Quantified EEG findings in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Paper presented at: meeting of the American Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Conference;1993:Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  35. Farrar DJ, Locke SE, Kantrowitz, FG. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. I. Etiology and Pathogenesis Behav Med 1995; 21: 5–16.
  36. Plioplys S, Plioplys AV. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. South Med J 1995; 88: 993–1000.[Medline]
  37. Dobbins JG, Natelson BH, Brassloff I, Drastal S, Sisto SA. Physical, behavioral, and psychological risk factors for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A central role for stress? J Chronic Fatigue Syndr 1995; 1: 43–57.[CrossRef]
  38. Salit IE. Precipitating events in CFS. Paper presented at: meeting of the American Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Conference;1994: Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  39. Taerk G, Gnam W. A psychodynamic view of the chronic fatigue syndrome: The role of object relations in etiology and treatment. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1994; 16: 319–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Weissman MM, Orvaschel H, Gruenberg E, Burke JD, Regier DA. Lifetime prevalence of specific psychiatric disorders in three sites. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984; 41: 949–58.[Abstract]
  41. Goldsmith HF, Holzer CE, Manderscheid RW. Neighborhood characteristics and mental illness. Eval Prog Plan 1988; 21: 211–25.
  42. Adair RK. Unemployment and psychiatric disorder in a community sample: Variations by gender, age, social integration, and social class. Disser Abs Int 1989; 50–05: 1442.
  43. Lee RP. The causal priority between socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorder: A prospective study. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1976; 22: 1–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Williams DR, Takeuchi DT, Adair RK. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorder among Blacks and Whites. Social Forces 1992; 71: 179–94.[CrossRef]
  45. Wessely S. The epidemiology of chronic fatigue syndrome. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 1998; 7: 10–24.[Medline]
  46. Sohlberg S, Stahlheuer P, Tell P. Depression, gender, and identification: Replication and extension. Br J Clin Psychol 1997; 36: 453–55.
  47. Halbreich U, Lumley LA. The multiple interactional biological processes that might lead to depression and gender differences in its appearance. J Affective Disord 1993; 29: 159–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Daradkeh TK, Ghubash R, Abou-Saleh MT. Al Alin community survey of psychiatric comorbidity II. Sex differences in the prevalence of depressive disorders. J Affective Disord 2002; 72: 167–76.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Bovasso G, Smith C. Socioeconomic status and depressive syndrome: The role of inter- and intra-generational mobility, governmental assistance, and work environment. J Health Soc Behav 2001; 42: 277–94.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
E. Fuller-Thomson and J. Nimigon
Factors associated with depression among individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome: findings from a nationally representative survey
Fam. Pract., October 3, 2008; (2008) cmn064v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. Nelesen, Y. Dar, K. Thomas, and J. E. Dimsdale
The Relationship Between Fatigue and Cardiac Functioning
Arch Intern Med, May 12, 2008; 168(9): 943 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. ter Wolbeek, L. J. P. van Doornen, A. Kavelaars, and C. J. Heijnen
Predictors of Persistent and New-onset Fatigue in Adolescent Girls
Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e449 - e457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
S. Yamazaki, S. Fukuhara, Y. Suzukamo, S. Morita, T. Okamura, T. Tanaka, and H. Ueshima
Lifestyle and work predictors of fatigue in Japanese manufacturing workers
Occup. Med., June 1, 2007; 57(4): 262 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
D. Garver, A. Lazarus, K. Rajagopalan, L. Lamerato, L. M. Katz, L. S. Stern, M. Dolgitser, and J. J. Doyle
Racial Differences in Medication Switching and Concomitant Prescriptions in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder
Psychiatr Serv, May 1, 2006; 57(5): 666 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jahn, S. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Social Class
Right arrow Social Support
Right arrow Other Epidemiology
Right arrow Musculoskeletal
Right arrow Other Psychiatric Disorders


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS