Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koszycki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradwejn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koszycki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradwejn, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology
Right arrow Gastrointestinal
Right arrow Anxiety
Psychosomatic Medicine 67:590-595 (2005)
© 2005 American Psychosomatic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Central Cholecystokinin Activity in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Panic Disorder, and Healthy Controls

Diana Koszycki, PhD, Stéphane Torres, MD, James E. Swain, PhD and Jacques Bradwejn, MD

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, and the University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Royal Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Diana Koszycki, Stress and Anxiety Clinical Research Unit, Royal Ottawa Hospital, 1145 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 7K4. E-mail: dkoszyck{at}rohcg.on.ca


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Objective: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and panic disorder (PD) coexist with a high frequency. However, the nature of this relationship remains obscure. We have proposed that PD and IBS may share a common dysfunction of the central cholecystokinin (CCK) system. To test this hypothesis, we assessed whether the enhanced panicogenic response to CCK-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) observed in PD is also present in IBS.

Methods: Eight psychiatrically healthy IBS patients, 8 PD patients with no history of IBS, and 12 normal controls received a bolus injection of CCK-4 and placebo on two separate days in a double-blind, randomized fashion.

Results: Consistent with previous findings, panicogenic sensitivity to CCK-4 was enhanced in PD patients relative to controls. In contrast, IBS patients exhibited a response that was comparable to controls. Interestingly, CCK-4-induced nausea and abdominal distress were decreased in IBS patients relative to the other groups. No diagnostic difference was noted for cardiovascular response to CCK-4.

Conclusion: These data indicate that IBS patients with no lifetime psychiatric history do not share the CCK-2 receptor dysfunction implicated in the pathophysiology of PD and that this dysfunction may not be a common mechanism for both CNS and enteric nervous system disorders. Nevertheless, the results suggest that a dysfunction of the CCK system may be involved in the pathophysiology of some enteric symptoms associated with IBS.

Key Words: irritable bowel syndrome • panic disorder • panic attacks • cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide • gut–brain interaction

Abbreviations: IBS = irritable bowel syndrome; PD = panic disorder; CCK = cholecystokinin; NTS = nucleus tractus solitarius; CBF = cerebral blood flow; NC = normal controls; PSS = Panic Symptom Scale; CCK-4 = cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide; VAS = visual analog scale.


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
A close relationship between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and panic disorder (PD) has been documented in the literature. A high lifetime prevalence of PD has been reported in treatment-seeking IBS patients, and a substantial number of PD patients manifest IBS-like symptoms during their panic attacks (1–3). Population-based studies have also noted significant comorbidity between IBS and PD (4,5). Both illnesses have a similar age at onset, are more prevalent among females, are precipitated or exacerbated by stress, and follow a fluctuating clinical course (2,6). Furthermore, PD and IBS patients have similar personality structures characterized by high neuroticism and harm avoidance and a cognitive style characterized by hypervigilance and hypersensitivity to internal stimuli (7,8). It is also intriguing that both disorders are improved with benzodiazepines and antidepressants (9–11). Such similarities suggest that IBS and PD may share a common diathesis. The interface between panic anxiety and IBS-like symptoms has led some authors to propose a neuroanatomical model that integrates gastrointestinal structures and fear circuits in the brain (2,12,13). This model of overlap between PD and IBS is interesting in conjunction with research demonstrating the involvement of the gut–brain hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) in the etiology of PD (14–18). CCK is found in high concentrations in the mammalian brain including the brainstem, limbic system, and cerebral cortex, where it serves as a putative neurotransmitter or exerts a neuromodulatory influence (19). Two principal CCK receptors have been characterized and cloned: CCK-1 receptors, which are mainly present in the periphery (e.g., stomach, gut, gallbladder, pancreas) but also are found in distinct brain structures such as the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), the area postrema, the interpenduncular nucleus, and the hypothalamus, and CCK-2 receptors, which predominate in the brain (20).

Stimulation of central CCK receptors with the selective CCK-2 receptor agonist, CCK-tetrapeptide (CCK-4), reliably and dose-dependently provokes panic attacks in humans, with PD patients being exquisitely sensitive to CCK-4’s panicogenicity (14–16). The CCK-4 induced panic attacks are accompanied by gastrointestinal symptoms that characterize DSM-IV panic attacks, including nausea and abdominal distress. Furthermore, CCK-4-induced anxiety is accompanied by marked biological alterations, including increases in heart rate, blood pressure, and minute respiration as well as activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (16,21–23).

Electrophysiological monitoring with topographic spectral electroencephalography and brainstem evoked potential recordings indicate that CCK-4 penetrates the human brain and has robust effects on the brainstem (24–26), which is a proposed primary site of action of CCK-4 (27). Neuroimaging studies have also shown that CCK-4-induced panic anxiety is associated with cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes. Benkelfat et al. (28) reported that CCK-4-induced panic in healthy volunteers was associated with rCBF increases in anterior cingulate cortex, cerebellum, and bilateral regions including insula, claustrum, and amygdala. Javanmard et al. (29) extended this work with a protocol of sampling the induced panic episodes at early and late time points (1 or 2 minutes after CCK-4 bolus injection). They found that the early time was associated with rCBF increases in the hypothalamus, the late time point was associated with rCBF increases in the claustrum–insular region, and both phases were associated with rCBF decreases in medial frontal cortex. These imaging data indicate that the panicogen CCK-4 is associated with activation of brain regions of particular relevance in the control of gut function and perhaps the pathophysiology of IBS (30), including amygdala, hypothalamus, and prefrontal cortex.

We have proposed that IBS and PD may share a common dysfunction of the CCK system (31,32). To investigate this hypothesis, we compared behavioral and cardiovascular responses to a submaximal dose of systemic CCK-4 in IBS patients with no lifetime psychiatric history, PD patients with no history of IBS, and normal controls (NC).


   METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects
Subjects were recruited through local advertisement and participated in the study after providing written informed consent. The sample consisted of 8 patients (1 man, 7 women; mean age = 39.50 ± 10.9 years) who met ROME II criteria (33) for IBS of at least one year’s duration, 8 patients (6 men, 2 woman; mean age = 36.75 ± 10.8 years) who met criteria for PD with or without agoraphobia according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) (34), and 12 normal controls (NC) (8 men, 4 women; mean age = 30.7 ± 6.4 years). All of the IBS patients had received a diagnosis of IBS from a physician (gastroenterologist in 5 cases and family physician in 3 cases) on the basis of history, physical examination, and appropriate tests to exclude significant gastrointestinal pathology. The diagnosis of IBS was confirmed by a second history taken by one of the study physicians. IBS and NC subjects had no lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric illness, including a history of sporadic panic attacks, according to the SCID. PD patients had no history of IBS according to medical history. Other than a diagnosis of IBS in the IBS group, all subjects were physically healthy as determined by medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, vital signs, and routine laboratory tests including thyroid function test. Subjects who tested positive for drugs of abuse were excluded. Pregnant or lactating females were excluded from the study. None of the subjects were taking medication during the study. The only current medication allowed was oral contraceptives. Furthermore, IBS patients were asked to stop all drugs for their bowel symptoms 48 hours before the challenge. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Royal Ottawa Hospital and by Health Canada.

Materials
Cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4), consisting of an amino acid chain of TRP-MET-ASP-PHE-NH2, was synthesized by Peninsula (Belmont, CA) and prepared by GIS Medicament (Nantes, France) as intravenous solutions according to previous protocols (15). A 20-µg dose of CCK-4 was used in this study. The rationale for dose of the CCK-4 was based on data from dose–response studies, which showed that a dose of 20 µg CCK-4 produces a high panic rate in PD patients and readily discriminates between PD and NC subjects (15,16). Placebo consisted of an equal volume of saline. CCK-4 and placebo were administered intravenously in a bolus injection (i.e., less than 5 seconds).

Assessment
Behavioral Evaluation
A DSM-IV-derived Panic Symptom Scale (PSS) was used to characterize behavioral response to the challenge (15). Subjects were directed to rate the severity of 18 panic symptoms as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or extremely severe (4). Two separate scores were obtained from this scale: (a) a score reflecting the total number of symptoms reported (i.e., number of symptoms with scores ≥1) and (b) a sum intensity score (i.e., the sum of the intensity ratings). Five physical sensations rarely associated with experimentally induced panic were included in the PSS to evaluate response bias toward item overendorsement. These items were earache, itchy nose, stuffy nose, low back pain, and itchy feet. The response bias items were tallied and analyzed separately. To meet criteria for a panic attack, subjects had to achieve a score of two or higher on the anxiety/fear/apprehension item of the PSS and a score of one or higher on each of at least four other items. In addition, PD patients had to report that the CCK-4-induced panic attack was similar to their naturally occurring panic.

Cardiovascular Evaluation
Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded using automated equipment (DinamapTM, Critikon, Canada).

Assessment of IBS Symptoms
A Visual Analog Scale was used to measure 11 gastrointestinal symptoms (GI-VAS). Subjects were directed to indicate the intensity of these symptoms by transecting the 100-mm line with a vertical line. The length in millimeters from the extreme 0 to the vertical line made by the subjects was used to calculate GI-VAS scores. The GI-VAS was administered to the IBS group only.

Procedure
Subjects arrived at the research unit at 8:00 AM after an overnight fast. They were not permitted to smoke or use caffeine- or xanthine-containing substances within 48 hours before each day of testing. CCK-4 and placebo were administered in a randomized order on two separate days under double-blind conditions. The subject sat in a reclining chair, a venous catheter was installed into an antecubital vein, and a physiological saline drip was initiated. A blood pressure cuff with a pulse monitor attached to an automatic sphygmomanometer was applied to the other arm. After baseline measures were obtained, subjects received a single intravenous bolus injection of the study solution (CCK-4 or placebo). Subjects were asked to describe any symptoms they experienced after the injection. Vital signs were recorded immediately before (time 0) and every 20 seconds for the first 5 minutes after the injection. Immediately after the symptoms had abated, the symptoms subjects experienced were evaluated with the PSS. VAS ratings of bowel symptoms were obtained from IBS patients at baseline and after the challenge. Subjects rated their bowel symptoms on the VAS to reflect how they felt at the peak effect after each challenge.

Data Analyses
Analysis of variance appropriate for a repeated measures design (ANOVAR) was performed on all baseline and postchallenge continuous data. Challenge (CCK-4 or placebo) was the within-subject variable, and diagnosis was the between-subject variable. For cardiovascular measures, peak change scores (CCK-4/placebo peak score minus time 0) were used in the analyses. The main interest in the ANOVAR was whether sensitivity to CCK-4 varied as a function of diagnosis. This would be reflected in a challenge by diagnosis interaction. If significant interactions were observed, one-way ANOVAs followed by the post hoc Bonferroni test were conducted separately for the placebo and CCK-4 conditions to examine simple main effects of diagnosis. Because few subjects reported symptoms during the placebo challenge, scores for the onset and duration of symptoms were analyzed by ANOVA for the CCK-4 challenge only. Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square analysis. For cells with expected frequencies less than five, Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze individual 2 x 2 tables. All data are presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assumed as p < .05 (two-tailed tests). Trends (p < .10) are also reported.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
There was no significant difference between the diagnostic groups with respect to age (F = 2.44, df = 2, p = ns); however, significant gender differences were observed with a greater representation of women in the IBS versus the PD and NC groups (Fisher’s exact test p = .04 and p = .02, respectively). Because gender did not correlate significantly with any of the dependent variables, it was not used as a covariate in the analyses.

Placebo challenge did not provoke a panic attack in any of the subjects. Panic attack frequency after CCK-4 challenge was 75% (6/8) for PD patients, 17% (2/12) for NCs, and 0% (0/8) for IBS patients. The differences in panic frequency after CCK-4 challenge was statistically significant, with the frequency being higher in PD versus IBS and NC subjects (Fisher’s exact test p = .007 and p = .019, respectively). ANOVAR performed on PSS data revealed significant challenge main effects (F = 96.45, df = 1,25, p < .001 and F = 48.01, df = 1,25, p < .001), diagnosis main effects (F = 5.65, df = 2,25, p < .01 and F = 7.70, df = 2,25, p < .01), and challenge by diagnosis interactions (F = 4.91, df = 2,25, p < .05 and F = 6.60, df = 2,25, p < .01) for the number and sum intensity of panic symptoms, respectively. As shown in Table 1, post hoc Bonferroni tests revealed that PD patients had higher scores on these measures than both IBS and NC subjects after the CCK-4 challenge. The onset and duration of symptoms after CCK-4 challenge did not differentiate the groups. No significant effects were detected for the number of reported response bias items.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Effect of Diagnosis on Behavioral and Cardiovascular Response to CCK-4 and Placebo Challenge

 

Mean ± SD intensity rating scores for individual panic symptoms after CCK-4 and placebo challenge are shown in Table 2. Statistically significant challenge main effects were found for all 18 panic symptoms, with scores being higher after the CCK-4 than placebo challenge. Significant challenge x diagnosis interactions were also found for 9 of 18 PSS symptoms, including unsteadiness (p < .05), faintness (p < .01), trembling/shaking (p < .05), nausea (p < .01), paresthesia (p < .001), flushes/chills (p < .01), anxiety/fear/apprehension (p < .01), fear of dying (p < .05), and fear of losing control (p < .01). Post hoc Bonferroni tests indicated that these symptoms were rated as more intense by PD compared with IBS and NC subjects after the CCK-4 challenge.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2. Intensity of DSM-IV Panic Symptoms After CCK-4 and Placebo Challenge

 

Interestingly, intensity ratings of CCK-4-induced nausea and abdominal distress were lower in IBS patients compared with the other two groups. Within-group analysis using paired t tests failed to detect a placebo–CCK-4 difference on these PSS items for IBS patients. In contrast, significant placebo–CCK-4 differences were detected for PD and NC subjects: nausea (t = 4.23, df = 7, p < .01, and t = 2.86, df = 11, p < .05, respectively) and abdominal distress (t = 2.39, df = 7, p < .05 and t = 2.80, df = 11, p < .05, respectively). The proportion of IBS patients who reported having symptoms of nausea and abdominal distress was also lower compared with the other two groups; 87% (7/8) and 62% (5/8), respectively, for the PD group, 58% (7/12) and 58% (7/12), respectively, for the NC group, and 25% (2/8) and 37% (3/8), respectively, for the IBS group. Differences between IBS and PD patients on the frequency of reported nausea was statistically significant (Fisher’s exact test, p = .041).

VAS ratings of gastrointestinal symptoms obtained at baseline and after the placebo and CCK-4 challenge for the IBS subjects are shown in Table 3. Ratings after both the placebo and CCK-4 injection were low. Paired t tests revealed no significant difference between placebo and CCK-4 for any of the IBS symptoms.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3. Effects of CCK-4 and Placebo on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ratings of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in IBS Patients

 

No significant main effects or interactions were found for baseline heart rate or blood pressure scores. ANOVARs performed on peak change scores yielded a significant challenge main effect for heart rate (F = 60.22, df = 1,25, p < .001), systolic blood pressure (F = 8.94, df = 1,25, p < .01), and diastolic blood pressure (F = 7.24, df = 1,25, p < .05), but no significant diagnosis main effects or interactions. As anticipated, the increase in heart rate and blood pressure was greater after the CCK-4 than placebo challenge. Mean ± SD maximum change scores for cardiovascular measures are shown in Table 1.


   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Overall, the results of this study do not provide strong evidence that IBS and PD share a common dysfunction of the CCK-2 receptor system. Consistent with previous findings (15), patients with PD exhibited an enhanced sensitivity to CCK-4’s panicogenicity compared with normal controls. They reported a greater number of panic symptoms, more intense panic symptoms, and a higher frequency of panic attack. In contrast, none of the IBS patients reported a panic attack after systemic CCK-4. Two subjects reported subjective feelings of anxiety, fear, or apprehension, but this was rated as being mild in intensity. Although differences between IBS and normal control subjects were not statistically significant, it is notable that IBS patients reported fewer panic symptoms and less intense symptoms than controls. Analysis of heart rate and blood pressure response confirms previous reports that CCK-4 has robust effects on the cardiovascular system (16,22). Although both PD and IBS have been associated with autonomic nervous system dysfunction (35–37), the degree of elevation of heart rate and blood pressure after CCK-4 challenge was unrelated to diagnostic status. This suggests that cardiovascular autonomic system function may not be altered in IBS and PD versus normal control subjects. This could also suggests that unlike the pathways stimulated by CCK-4 to provoke panic anxiety in PD, the pathways stimulated by CCK-4 to produce cardiovascular changes in IBS and PD are not altered as compared with normal control subjects.

An interesting result of this study was the decreased gastrointestinal response to CCK-4 in the IBS group relative to PD and normal control subjects. In humans, systemic CCK-4 has been consistently reported to induce nausea, cramping, and abdominal distress (14–16,22), and acute pretreatment with the selective CCK-2 receptors antagonist L-365–260 attenuated CCK-4-induced abdominal distress in PD patients (38). These data suggest that CCK-2 receptors play a role in eliciting gastrointestinal symptoms associated with panic anxiety. It is not clear at present why CCK-4 had no demonstrable effect on gastrointestinal symptoms in our IBS patients. One explanation is that CCK-2 receptors are down-regulated in these patients, rendering them less sensitive to CCK-4-induced anxiety and gastrointestinal symptoms. Support for this view comes from a study demonstrating that antagonism of CCK-2 receptors after chronic treatment with CI-988 worsens gastrointestinal symptoms in anxious patients with comorbid IBS versus anxious patients with no IBS comorbidity (39). It may be that chronic administration of CI-988 unmasked a hypoactive CCK-2 receptor system.

It is also conceivable that decreased gastrointestinal sensitivity to CCK-4 in our IBS patients is attributable to an imbalance between CCK-1 and CCK-2 receptors. IBS has been associated with hyperactivity of CCK-1 receptors, and CCK-1 receptor antagonists are currently under clinical development as therapeutic agents for this syndrome (40). Animal studies have shown that there is a functional relationship between central and peripheral CCK receptors. In rats, agonism of CCK-1 and CCK-2 receptors results in opposite firing activity in NTS neurons (41) and opposite behavioral effects (42). These findings have led to the hypothesis that there may be a mutually inhibitory relationship between the CCK-1 and CCK-2 receptor systems (42). Thus, one might speculate that the decreased gastrointestinal response to systemic CCK-4 in our IBS patients resulted from an inhibitory action of the CCK-1 system on the CCK-2 system. A fruitful line of research will be to investigate whether CCK-1 and CCK-2 receptor antagonists differentially affect behavioral and gastrointestinal sensitivity to CCK-4 in IBS patients, and to combine such behavioral work with neuroimaging (43).

Methodological limitations of this study require mention. First, interpretation of the results are limited by the small sample size and the unequal gender distribution across groups, particularly the greater number of females in the IBS group and greater number of males in the PD group. In addition, our IBS patients were recruited from local advertisement and may not be representative of the type of patients seen in specialized gastrointestinal clinic. It is possible that had we recruited psychiatrically healthy IBS patients from a specialized gastrointestinal clinic, we might have obtained different findings. Also, we failed to measure severity of IBS symptoms. Some of our patients may have had a mild form of the illness, and this could have affected their response to stimulation of CCK-2 receptors with CCK-4. Indeed, it is conceivable that IBS pathophysiology is distinct in patients with mild versus severe IBS, with milder form of the syndrome being associated with greater peripheral versus central contribution to symptomatic process.

In summary, these preliminary data indicate that IBS patients with no lifetime history of PD do not share the CCK-2 receptor dysfunction implicated in the pathophysiology of PD and that this dysfunction may not be a common mechanism for the two disorders. Further research is needed to replicate these findings. It would also be of considerable interest to evaluate whether CCK-4 differentially affects IBS patients with and without PD comorbidity and PD patients with and without prominent GI symptoms. Such research would further elucidate the neurobiological link between IBS and PD and between the brain and the gut, and clarify whether PD associated with IBS patients is the same as PD without IBS identified in psychiatric samples.

We are grateful to Maria Pizzi, BSc, RN, Alyson Robins, BSc, RN, and Graham Machacek, BA for research assistance. We also thank Pauline Bazinet, MD for her assistance in the study.


   NOTES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
REFERENCES
 

This study was supported in part by the Medical Research Council of Canada, Group Grant 13306.

DOI:10.1097/01.psy.0000160465.79007.65


   REFERENCES
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Lydiard RB, Laraia MT, Howell EF, Ballenger JC. Can panic disorder present as irritable bowel syndrome? J Clin Psychiatry 1986;47:470–3.[Medline]
  2. Walker EA, Roy-Byrne PP, Katon WJ. Irritable bowel syndrome and psychiatric illness. Am J Psychiatry 1990;147:565–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kaplan DS, Masand PS, Gupta S. The relationship between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and panic disorder. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1996;8:81–8.[Medline]
  4. Walker EA, Katon WJ, Jemelka RP, Roy-Byrne PP. Comorbidity of gastrointestinal complaints, depression and anxiety in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) study. Am J Med 1992;92:26S–30S.[Medline]
  5. Lydiard RB, Greenwald MA, Weissman MM, Johnson J, Drossman DA, Ballenger JC. Panic disorder and gastrointestinal symptoms: findings from the NIMH epidemiologic catchment area project. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:64–70.[Medline]
  6. Woodman CL, Noyes R. The relationship between panic disorder and irritable bowel syndrome: a review. Ann Clin Psychiatry 1992;4:175–80.
  7. Dinan TG, O’Keane V, O’Boyle C, Chua A, Keeling PWN. A comparison of the mental status, personality profiles and life events of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1991;84:26–8.[Medline]
  8. Hazlett-Stevens H, Craske MG, Mayer EA, Chang L, Naliboff BD. Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome among university students. The roles of worry, neuroticism, anxiety sensitivity and visceral anxiety. J Psychosom Res 2003;55:501–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Noyes R Jr, Cook B, Garvey M, Summers R. Reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms following treatment for panic disorder. Psychosomatics 1990;31:75–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Geisman RA, Alpers DH. Antidepressant therapy in 138 patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a five-year clinical experience. Aliment Pharmacol Psychiatr Ther 1994;8:409–16.
  11. Creed F, Fernandes L, Guthrie E, Ratcliffe PS, Read N, Rigby C, Thompson D, Tomenson B. The cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy and paroxetine for severe irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology 2003;124:303–17.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Fossey MD, Lydiard RB. Anxiety and the gastrointestinal system. Psychiatric Med 1990;8:175–86.
  13. Lydiard RB. Anxiety and the irritable bowel syndrome: psychiatric, medical, or both? J Clin Psychiatry 1997;58:51–8.
  14. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Meterissian G. Cholecystokinin tetrapeptide induces panic attacks in patients with panic disorder. Can J Psychiatry 1990;35:83–5.[Medline]
  15. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Shriqui C. Enhanced sensitivity of panic disorder to cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide: clinical and behavioral results. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:603–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Annable L, Couëtoux du Tertre A, Reines S, Karkanias C. A dose-ranging study of the behavioral and cardiovascular effects of CCK-4 in patients with panic disorder. Biol Psychiatry 1992;32:903–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Akiyoshi J, Isogawa K, Tsutsumi T, Kasturagi S, Kohno K, Furuta M, Yamamoto H, Yamada K, Fukii I. Cholecystokinin tetrapeptide-induced calcium mobilization in T cells of patients with panic disorder, major depression or schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 1997;42:151–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kennedy JL, Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, King N, Crowe R, Vincent J, Fourie O. Investigation of CCK system genes in panic disorder. Mol Psychiatry 1999;4:206–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Noble F, Wank SA, Crawley JN, Bradwejn J, Seroogy KB, Hamon M, Roques BP. International union of pharmacology. XXI. Structure, distributions, and functions of cholecystokinin receptors. Pharmacol Rev 2000;51:745–81.
  20. Wank SA, Pisegna JR, De Weerth A. Brain and gastrointestinal cholecystokinin receptor family: structure and functional expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:8691–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bradwejn J, LeGrand J-M, Koszycki, D, Bates JHT, Bourin M. The effects of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide on respiratory function in healthy volunteers. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:280–2.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Koszycki D, Zacharko RM, Le Melledo JM, Bradwejn J. Behavioural, cardiovascular and neuroendocrine profiles following CCK-4 challenge in healthy volunteers: a comparison of panickers and non-panickers. Dep Anx 1998;8:1–7.
  23. Flint AJ, Koszycki D, Bradwejn J, Vaccarino FJ. Neurohormonal response to cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide: a comparison of younger and older healthy subjects. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2000;25:633–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gunnarsson T, Mahoney C, Shlik J, Bradwejn J, Knott V. Acute effects of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide on brain stem auditory evoked potentials in healthy volunteers. Pharmacopsychiatry 2003;36:181–6.[Medline]
  25. Knott V, Mahoney C, Gunnarsson T, Bradwejn J, Shlik J. Acute cholecystokinin effects on event-related potentials in healthy volunteers. J Hum Psychopharmacol 2002;17:285–91.[CrossRef]
  26. Knott V, Mahoney C, Bradwejn J, Shlik J, Gunnarsson T. Effects of acute cholecystokinin infusion on hemispheric EEG asymmetry and coherence in healthy volunteers. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2003;27:179–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D. The cholecystokinin hypothesis of panic disorder. Ann NY Acad Sci 1994;713:273–82.[Medline]
  28. Benkelfat C, Bradwejn J, Meyer E, Ellenbogen M, Milot S, Gjedde A, Evan S. Functional neuroanatomy of CCK4-induced anxiety in normal healthy volunteers. Am J Psychiatry 1995;152:1180–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Javanmard M, Shlik J, Kennedy SH, Vaccarino FJ, Houle S, Bradwejn J. Neuroanatomical correlates of CCK-4-induced panic attacks in healthy humans: a time course study. Biol Psychiatry 1999;7:872–82.
  30. Mulak A, Bonaz B. Irritable bowel syndrome: a model of the brain-gut interactions. Med Sci Monit 2004;10:RA55–62.[Medline]
  31. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Payeur R. Role of cholecystokinin in irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1991;148:227.
  32. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D. Abnormal CCK function: a pathophysiological model for panic disorder and gastrointestinal disorders? Evolving pathophysiological models of functional GI disorders: implications for new drug development. New York: Health Education Alliance, Inc.; 2000. p. 89–91.
  33. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Muller-Lissner SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 1999;45(suppl 2):II43–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Willian JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (patient and non-patient edition). New York: Biometrics Research; 1995.
  35. Jarrett ME, Burr RL, Cain KC, Hertig V, Veisman P, Heitkemper MM. Anxiety and depressed are related to autonomic nervous system function in women with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:386–94.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Waring WS, Chui M, Japp A, Nicol EF, Ford MJ. Autonomic cardiovascular responses are impaired in women with irritable bowel syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2004;38:658–3.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Friedman BH, Thayer JF. Anxiety and autonomic flexibility: a cardiovascular approach. Biol Psychology 1998;49:303–23.
  38. Bradwejn J, Koszycki D, Couëtoux du Tertre A, van Megan H, den Boer J, Westenberg H, Annable L. The panicogenic effects of cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide are antagonised by L-356–260, a central cholecystokinin receptor antagonists, in patients with panic disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:486–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Adams JB, Pyke RE, Costa J, Cutler NR, Schweizer E, Wilcox CS, Wisselink PG, Greiner M, Pierce MW, Pande AC. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of a CCK-B receptor antagonist, CI-988, in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 1995;15:428–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Varga G, Balint A, Burghardt B, D’Amato. Involvement of endogenous CCK and CCK1 receptors in colonic motor function. Br J Pharmacol 2004;8:1275–84.[CrossRef]
  41. Branchereau P, Bohme GA, Champagnat J, Morin-Surun MP, Durieux C, Blanchard JC, Roques BP, Denavit-Saubie M. Cholecystokinin-A and cholecystokinin-B receptors in neurons of the brainstem solitary complex of the rat: pharmacological identification. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1992;260:1433–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Mannisto PT, Lang A, Harro J, Peuranen E, Bradwejn J, Vasar E. Opposite effects mediated by CCKA and CCKB receptors in behavioral and hormonal studies in rats. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 1994;349:478–84.[Medline]
  43. Hobson AR, Aziz Q. Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding? Gut 2004;53:1198–206.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koszycki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradwejn, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koszycki, D.
Right arrow Articles by Bradwejn, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology
Right arrow Gastrointestinal
Right arrow Anxiety

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS