| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
INTRODUCTION |
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida D.S.S.); and the Division of Cardiology, St. Luke'sRoosevelt Hospital Center, and the Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (A.R.).
Address correspondence and reprint requests to David S. Sheps, MD, MSPH, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL 32610-0277. E-mail: shepsds{at}medicine.ufl.edu
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have chosen to focus on depression and heart disease because both are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Depression is observed quite commonly within cardiac populations, with a prevalence three to four times that of the general population. Moreover, our understanding of how depression is related to CAD is rapidly evolving.
The goal of this supplement is to summarize recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenicity of depressive symptoms and their management in cardiac practice. The articles in this supplement address four topics, including delineating the epidemiology that links depressive syndromes to coronary artery disease (CAD), defining the pathophysiology that mediates this association, evaluating the efficacy of treatment options for depression among cardiac patients, and reviewing potential ways in which cardiologists and other physicians can enhance behavioral intervention in clinical practice.
| EPIDEMIOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the next chapter, Kubzansky et al. examine the range of mild symptoms, well below the threshold of severe symptoms that define major clinical depression, which may also be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes (3). For example, the authors refer to recent studies of postinfarction patients in which BDI scores of only 5 to 9, a very mild range for depressive symptoms, were associated with an increased frequency of cardiac events (4,5). It remains to be determined if this threshold is a reproducible finding, particularly among initially healthy subjects. Nevertheless, other data reviewed by the authors suggest that the range of psychologic factors of interest may be far wider than previously conceived. The authors cite recent evidence linking pessimism, a potential cognitive precursor of depression, to adverse cardiac outcomes. They also review preliminary data that suggest that other negative cognitive states such as worry and rumination may also be associated with adverse cardiovascular effects.
The juxtaposition of these two articles has a practical clinical implication. Whereas psychiatrists are trained to focus on severe depressive symptoms, physicians in clinical practice are commonly exposed to a wide gamut of depressive symptoms, from mild to severe. Pending further study, the results cited in these articles may encourage physicians to pay closer attention to mild depressive symptoms in their patients. There is a spectrum of depressive symptoms, and even negative cognitive states, that may be associated with the development of CAD and thus worthy of our attention and clinical management.
Gender
Knowledge of gender differences in disease prevalence and presentation is important in cardiovascular practice. Ischemic symptoms, for example, often present differently in men and women. Some diagnostic tests such as exercise electrocardiography have different sensitivities and specificities in men and women. Gender may also play an important role in the link between depression and cardiovascular disease. As pointed by Naqvi et al. (6), depression is twice as common in females compared with males within cardiac populations, paralleling a higher incidence of depression in women in the general population. Although emphasizing that depression's potency as a CAD risk factor appears independent of gender, the authors speculate on potential reasons for this gender gap in the prevalence of depression. In light of sparse but suggestive data from treatment trials that is reviewed by the authors, they also suggest the need to develop and assess gender-specific approaches for treating depression among cardiac patients.
Methodologic Issues Regarding Epidemiology Studies of Depression
In the final article in our section on epidemiology, Frasure-Smith and Lespérance focus on methodologic issues related to proper epidemiologic investigation of depression (7). Many of the methodologic challenges cited by the authors pertain to cardiology in general and include such thorny issues as the reliance on death certificates and varying definitions of cardiovascular death based on different International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for assessing medical outcome data. The authors also cite a problem more specific to outcome studies regarding depression, that being the reporting of results from studies with insufficient statistical power to detect significant associations between depression and outcomes. The authors emphasize that among studies that have been adequately powered (although sometimes with other methodologic problems), a robust relationship has been noted between depression and cardiovascular outcomes. The authors provide strong grounds for reexamining current methods of adjusting the results of outcome studies for the presence of covariates of depression.
| PATHOPHYSIOLOGY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the early important findings is that depression can be associated with hypercortisolemia. Accordingly, this section of our supplement begins with a brief summary of hypercortisolemia by Gillespie and Nemeroff (8). They note the common elevation of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) that occurs in the cerebrospinal fluid of depressed subjects. This stimulation leads to hyperactivity of the hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis, high plasma cortisol levels, blunting of the ACTH response to CRF infusion, dexamethasone nonsuppression, and adrenal hypertrophy. The authors note that hypercortisolemia is not universal in depression, a finding that has also been emphasized by Gold and Chrousos (9), but among those depressed subjects with hypercortisolemia, these physiological abnormalities can disappear after successful clinical intervention. The authors conclude by noting experimental pharmacologic approaches that would attempt to treat depression based on the linkage of depression to dysregulation of the HPA axis.
Depression is also associated with stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which, as noted by Carney et al., is associated with elevated levels of circulating plasma norepinephrine levels (10). Such stimulation is associated with resultant dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. The authors note that depressed subjects generally manifest increases in resting heart rates compared with nondepressed controls and decreased heart rate variability in some cohorts with depression. They also review preliminary data regarding baroreflex dysfunction and increased QT variability in depressed subjects.
Depression is also associated with complex platelet abnormalities such as increased concentrations of functional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors (11) and hyperactivity of the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) transporter2A receptor signal transduction system (12). Bruce and Musselman provide a detailed list of recent studies regarding abnormalities of platelet activation, secretion, and aggregation among patients with depression or related negative emotional states (11). In addition, they review recent data regarding the potential antiplatelet effects that may result from the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and discuss potential clinical implications that may be derived from these findings.
Kop and Gottdiener describe new research into the evolving understanding of how depression can promote inflammation (13). They begin their review with an overview of the link between inflammation and atherosclerosis. They next review the relationship between depression and a range of immune abnormalities, including increased production of cytokines and acute-phase proteins such as C-reactive protein. In addition, they discuss the potential bidirectional relationship that may exist between depression and atherosclerosis, citing, for example, data indicating an increase in depressive symptoms after the experimental administration of tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
).
Besides direct pathophysiological effects, depression may contribute to CAD by its recognized association with various coronary-prone behaviors such as smoking, physical inactivity, and poor diets. Moreover, depression may promote lifestyle and medication nonadherence, an important issue in the treatment of cardiac patients.
The relationship between depression and behavior as they relate to the pathogenesis of CAD is complex, as illustrated in a scholarly review of depression and smoking behavior by Freedland et al. (14). They review many aspects of the depression-smoking link such as whether depression and smoking behavior are causally linked to each other (or related to each other by a "third party" such as genetics) and whether smoking plays a direct mediating role in the relationship between depression and CAD.
Overall, the pathophysiological links between depression and CAD are impressive, both for the strength and number of mechanisms involved. These data indicate that depression can be viewed as a disease with broad systemic effects involving potential activation of essentially all of the important mediators of atherosclerosis. The studies exploring the pathophysiological mechanisms of depression can lay the groundwork for such studies of other psychosocial risk factors as well.
Positive Psychologic Factors
If negative psychologic factors are associated with CAD, are positive factors associated with better health outcomes? Recent data, although limited, suggest this may be the case (15). The next article explores this through a paradigm of "flexibility" (16). This paradigm proposes that "vitality," a potentially health-promoting state of positive energy and enthusiasm, is promoted by the ability to exert emotional and coping flexibility. Conversely, inflexibility, including the inflexibility represented by depression and other negative emotional states, diminishes vitality. Prospective evaluation of this idea is required, but preliminary evidence links a wide variety of inflexible life conditions to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
| THERAPEUTIC CONSIDERATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH KNOWN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTION IN CARDIAC PRACTICE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This supplement is dedicated not only to the loyal readership of our journal, but also to the larger medical community we are aiming to reach with this issue. Our hope is that this exposure will lead to greater efforts to evaluate and improve the management of depression and other psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice.
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In accordance with CME accreditation guidelines, author David S. Sheps disclosed that he has served on the speakers' bureau for Pfizer. Alan Rozanski disclosed no real or potential conflicts of interest.
DOI:10.1097/01.psy.0000164251.27403.d9
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Bunde and R. Martin Depression and Prehospital Delay in the Context of Myocardial Infarction Psychosom Med, January 1, 2006; 68(1): 51 - 57. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Levin Depression, Heart Disease: Links Remain Elusive Psychiatr News, August 5, 2005; 40(15): 33 - 41. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |