| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
From the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (B.H.B., A.D.K., I.C.S., R.S.S., S.Z., J.C.B., R.B.W.), Center for Human Genetics (A.A.-K.), and Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology (C.K.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Beverly H. Brummett, Box 2969, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail: brummett{at}duke.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: The sample consisted of 74 males enrolled in a case/control study of caregivers for relatives with dementia. Age- and race-adjusted linear regression models were used to examine the association between low versus high MAOA-uVNTR activity alleles, symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression), and sleep quality ratings (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).
Results: MAOA-uVNTR alleles associated with less transcriptional activity were related to increased symptoms of depression (p < .04; Cohens d = 0.52) and poorer sleep quality (p < .04; Cohens d = 0.31).
Conclusions: Individuals with less active MAOA-uVNTR alleles may be at increased risk for depressive symptoms and poor sleep.
Key Words: monoamine oxidase-A MAOA-uVNTR depression sleep
Abbreviations: CAD = coronary artery disease; CES-D = Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression; MAOA = monoamine oxidase-A; MAOA-uVNR = variable number of tandem repeats in the MAOA linked polymorphic region; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The primary role of MAOA in regulating monoamine turnover, and hence ultimately influencing levels of norepinephrine, dopamine, and serotonin, indicates that its gene is a highly plausible candidate for affecting individual differences in the manifestation of psychological traits and psychiatric disorders (6). For example, recent evidence indicates that the MAOA gene may be associated with depression (7). However, evidence regarding whether higher or lower MAOA gene transcriptional efficiency is positively associated with psychological pathology has been mixed. The low-activity 3-repeat allele of the MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism has been positively related to symptoms of antisocial personality (8) and cluster B personality disorders (2). Other studies, however, suggest that alleles associated with higher transcriptional efficiency are related to unhealthy psychological characteristics such as trait aggressiveness and impulsivity (9,10). Finally, others have reported finding no significant association between the MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism and negative characteristics such as recurrent major depression and bipolar disorder (11).
Sleep disturbances are also linked to the MAOA gene. Specifically, sleep problems are found in those with Norrie disease, which is caused by X-chromosomal microdeletions that include the MAOA gene. Such sleep disturbances may be partly attributed to deficient MAO activity (12,13). Furthermore, male mice lacking MAOA show, among other behavioral problems, violent motions during sleep (14). Finally, MAOA inhibitors used in the treatment of depression are associated with both sleep disruption and daytime sedation (15,16).
In terms of the pharmacology of these effects, inhibition of the degradation of each of the monoamines, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT), dopamine, and norepinephrine, has the potential to contribute to the observed sleep disturbance. Impaired degradation of 5HT would be expected to have effects similar to 5HT reuptake inhibitors, which are associated with sleep disturbance and suppression of rapid eye movement (REM) (14,17). However, adult knockout mice lacking the serotonin transporter have more REM sleep than wild type animals (18). Whether there is a corresponding difference in acute versus lifelong impairment of MAOA function is unclear. If so, it would speak against the importance of decreased 5HT degradation as a mechanism for sleep disturbance in low MAOA activity individuals. The suppression of REM sleep that accompanies medication-related increases in 5HT is mediated by binding to 5HT1A receptors; 5HT2 receptor activation diminishes non-REM sleep (19–21).
There are several lines of evidence suggesting that MAO-A inhibition may disturb sleep via increasing noradrenergic activity. Chronic inhibition of MAO-A with clorgyline has been demonstrated to significantly enhance noradrenaline release in the central nervous system (22). Implicating this mechanism in sleep disruption is that specific norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors have sleep disturbance as a common side-effect (23,24). An increase in synaptic norepinephrine concentration also plays a role in the wake-promoting effects of amphetamines (25,26). A factor promoting increased extracellular norepinephrine with low MAOA activity is that there is a buildup of normetanephrine (normally metabolized to vannillylmandelic acid by MAOA), which seems to inhibit norepinephrine reuptake (27,28). In addition, mice with mutations of the gene for tyrosine hydroxylase do not synthesize epinephrine and norepinephrine and sleep an average of 2 hours longer than normals (29). The sleep-disturbing effects of increased synaptic levels of norepinephrine are mediated by agonist effects at
1-adrenergic receptors as well as by a down-regulation of presynaptic
2-inhibitory autoreceptors, which occurs with chronic increases in synaptic norepinephrine (30–32).
Decreased metabolism of dopamine and sleep disturbance are linked by evidence that increasing extracellular dopamine is one of the key wake-promoting mechanisms of the most potent stimulants including methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, cocaine, and methylphenidate (26,33). Further, there is evidence that dopamine transporter knockout mice have reduced non-REM sleep and increased waking (34). The receptors which mediate these dopaminergic effects are unknown.
Recent research (35) indicates that, in studies examining genetic effects, it is important to consider gene by environmental interactions when analyzing the relationship between genetic markers and health. Caspi et al. (36) reported that children with a history of maltreatment, in conjunction with the presence of MAOA-uVNTR alleles that confer low activity, were more likely to develop antisocial problems. Similarly, Foley et al. (37) found that an adverse childhood environment was a significant moderator of MAOA activity such that low activity was associated with higher risk for conduct disorder only in children with a background of maltreatment. Kim-Cohen et al. (38) demonstrated that MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism interacts with early exposure to physical abuse, resulting in poor scores on a composite measure of mental health problems in individuals with the genotype conferring low versus high activity. Such findings suggest that the MAOA gene influences vulnerability to environmental stressors.
Consistent findings demonstrate that the burden associated with providing care for a loved one suffering from dementia is considerable (39). Caregiving has been associated with a number of negative health outcomes (40), including worse ratings of physical health, significant decreases in cellular immunity (41), and higher levels of triglycerides (42). Our own research in caregivers has also shown that they suffer from both increased symptoms of depression and poorer sleep quality (43). Caregiving has also been related to increased rates of early mortality in older caregivers who experience mental and emotional caregiving strain (44), and conclusions from a meta-analysis that combined the results of 23 studies indicate that caregivers are at significantly higher risk for health problems than noncaregivers (45). Thus, in light of the evidence suggesting gene by environment interactions, we hypothesized that the role of caregiving for a loved one with dementia would moderate the effect of MOA-uVNTR allele variation on symptoms of depression and sleep quality.
In sum, MAOA activity, as measured directly or inferred from the MAOA-uVNTR genotype, has been associated with a number of psychological (e.g., cluster B personality disorders, depression) and physical (e.g., disturbed sleep) characteristics. Based on these findings, we examined the relationship between allelic variation (low- versus high-activity alleles) in the MAOA-uVNTR polymorphism and symptoms of depression and sleep quality in a group of 74 males, who were enrolled in a case/control study of caregiving for a relative with dementia. Initially, we examined the main effect of MAOA-vUNTR on each outcome. In secondary analyses, we examined the MAOA-uVNTR gene as a moderator of caregiving stress with respect to each outcome.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The full study sample consisted of 85 males and 259 females. Because the MAOA gene is located on the X chromosome (Xp11.23), it is difficult to assess high versus low transcription in females. That is, current evidence suggests that it is not clear whether levels of MAOA transcription in females is the product of one or both copies of the gene (46,47). Therefore, as with many studies in this area, only the 85 males were included in the present study. Eleven individuals had incomplete genetic data, leaving the present sample with 74 males (42 caregivers and 32 controls). Individuals with missing data for MAOA did not differ from those with data on any independent or dependent variables.
Measures
Genotyping
Fresh blood samples were obtained and signed into the Center for Human Genetics DNA Bank. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted and stored according to methods and quality checks as previously reported (48). An aliquot of DNA was used for MAOA genotyping. The MAOA-u VNTR region was amplified with primers: Forward-FAM-CAGCCTGACCGTGGAGAAG and Reverse-GAACGGACGCTCCATTCGGA (1). Polymerase chain reaction products were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized using a multi-view scanner (FMBIO IIT, Hitachi, San Francisco, CA). We required that each assay achieve 95% efficiency (i.e., the genotypes of at least 95% of the samples could be called with certainty) to be considered for statistical analysis.
Symptoms of Depression
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (49) is a widely used 20-item self-report scale designed to measure depressive symptomatology in a general population. Items are scored on a 4-point scale, with the total CES-D score ranging between 0 and 60. Higher scores represent depressive responses, and a score of
16 is generally considered suggestive of a depressive disorder. Within the CES-D, there are the following four subscales: depressive affect, well-being, interpersonal, and somatic.
Sleep Quality
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (50) was used to measure sleep quality. The scale consists of 19 items that assess the following subcomponents of sleep during the past month: overall sleep quality, sleep latency (time to fall asleep on going to bed), sleep duration, sleep efficiency (time asleep/time in bed x 100), sleep disturbances, problems with daytime functioning, and medications taken for sleep. Items are combined to provide a global score (PSQI), with higher scores reflecting poorer sleep quality. A score of
5 on the global rating suggests moderate sleep problems in three or more areas, or more severe problems in at least two areas.
Statistical Analysis
General Linear Models were used to assess the relationship among MAOA-uVNTR transcription, symptoms of depression (CES-D), and sleep quality (PSQI). MAOA-uVNTR alleles were categorized according to transcriptional functionality, with the 3-repeat variant defined as low activity (coded 0) and longer alleles (3.5- and 4-repeat) defined as high activity (coded 1). In the present sample, there were no individuals with other MAOA-uVNTR alleles, i.e., 2-, 5-, and 6-repeat variants.
The main effect of allelic variation in MAOA-uVNTR was examined as a predictor of CES-D and PSQI scores. These models included MAOA activity (0/1), caregiver status (0/1), age in years, and race (0/1). In secondary analyses, caregiver status was examined as a moderator of the potential association between MAOA-uVNTR and each study outcome. Interaction models included MAOA activity, caregiver status, age in years, race, and MAOA activity x caregiver status. SAS 9.1 (Cary, NC) was used to conduct all analyses.
Along with the potential to influence ratings of depression, antidepressants are known to influence assessments of sleep. Of the 74 participants in the study, nine (12.2%) reported that they were currently taking antidepressant medication (none of which were MAOIs). Analyses were conducted both with and without individuals taking an antidepressant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The presence of low-activity alleles (3-repeat), as compared with the presence of higher-activity alleles (3.5- and 4-repeat), was associated with higher ratings on the CES-D (p < .04; Cohens d = 0.52) (52). The main effect analysis for MAOA-uVNTR was also significant for PSQI ratings (p < .04; Cohens d = 0.31), with MAOA-uVNTR activity accounting for 6% of the model variance. The form of the effect was such that the presence of low-activity alleles was associated with a global rating of poorer sleep quality, as compared with higher-activity alleles. Results are shown in Figure 1. Analyses of both the CES-D and the PSQI remained significant when the nine individuals on antidepressant medication were removed (p < .05 and p < .01, respectively). All product terms modeling the interaction between group (caregiver versus control) and MAOA-uVNTR genotype as a predictor of depressive symptoms and sleep quality were nonsignificant.
|
Post Hoc Follow-Up Analyses
To determine which symptoms of depression and aspects of sleep quality were most closely related to MAOA-uVNTR activity, in post hoc analyses, we examined each of the subscales for these measures. For the CES-D, the somatic symptoms subscale was strongly related to MAOA-uVNTR activity (p < .01; Cohens d = 0.71), with smaller effects for the Depressive affect (p < .12), Well-Being (p < .62), and Interpersonal (p < .55) subscales. MAOA-vNTR activity explained 16% of the model variance when predicting the CES-D somatic subscale. Regarding the subcomponents of the PSQI, overall sleep quality, sleep latency, and sleep efficiency were worse in the presence of low-activity alleles as compared with higher-activity alleles (p < .10); and the other four subcomponents were less strongly related (p values between .16 and .95).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Follow-up analyses demonstrated that allelic variation in MAOA-uVNTR was not significantly associated with measures of depression reflecting disturbances in affect, well being, or interpersonal associations. This lack of association is consistent with prior findings in this area that have failed to demonstrate an association of MAOA-uVNTR with depression (11) and bipolar disorder (53). In the present data, MAOA alleles conferring lower activity were, however, related to higher levels of somatic symptoms that primarily reflect lethargy (e.g., poor concentration, motivation, sleep, and lack of energy). It is possible that these fatigue-related symptoms are a product of the poorer sleep quality that was demonstrated among participants with lower rates of MAOA transcription in the present study. In addition, one of the items comprising the somatic subscale of the CES-D asks about "restless sleep." We recalculated the measure of somatic symptoms omitting the sleep item and the association between MAOA-uVNTR remained significant for this abbreviated somatic components subscale. We also tested whether or not the effect of the MAOA polymorphism on somatic symptoms was mediated by the effects on sleep quality by including the PSQI score as an additional covariate to the model containing MAOA-uVNTR as a predictor of somatic symptoms. Results of this analysis provided evidence for partial mediation (Sobel test t = 1.8; p < .07).
The association of low MAOA activity and diminished sleep quality is in agreement with the observed effects of medications, which inhibit MAOA function. These agents, most frequently administered for the treatment of major depression or anxiety disorders, very frequently lead to sleep disturbance (16,54). Although they are also potent suppressors of REM sleep, the clinical significance of this is unknown (15). Disturbed sleep has been the most frequent side-effect of the treatment of patients with major depression, panic disorder, and social phobia with the reversible MAOA inhibitor brofaromine and the irreversible inhibitor tranylcypromine, reported by as many as 53% (16,55,56). In addition, normal controls treated with brofaromine reported shorter sleep duration and lower sleep quality (57). In a polysomnographic study in depressed patients, the irreversible selective MAO-A inhibitor clorgyline nearly totally suppressed REM, significantly decreased total sleep time, and increased wake time during the night (58).
Given findings demonstrating the potential for environmental stressors to moderate the relationship between MAOA-uVNTR and certain outcomes (36–38), a significant stress (i.e., caregiving) by genotype interaction might have been expected. However, detecting interaction terms in observational studies often requires larger samples (59); it is important to note that this study was underpowered to fully examine the proposed interaction. For 80% power to detect an effect of 0.66 standard deviation would require a sample of three to four times that of the current sample. Thus, the study did not have the ability to provide an adequate test of the gene by environment hypothesis and the null finding should be interpreted in this light.
Certain other limitations should be noted with respect to the present findings. Because the sample consisted of only 74 participants, all results should be interpreted with proper caution and replication in additional samples will be required to determine their validity. We were unable to examine the ethnicity by gene interaction due to insufficient numbers of participants in certain cells (e.g., n = 2 for African Americans classified in the low MAOA activity group). It should also be noted that the present study only involved males and it is possible that gender differences may exist with respect to coping with the stress of caregiving, as well as with differences in depression rates or severity. Thus, the current findings may not generalize to females. There seems to be a consensus regarding which of the more commonly occurring MAOA-uVNTR alleles confer higher or lower transcription, but there remains dispute about the transcriptional activity of the less commonly found alleles (i.e., five copies of VNTR). Fortunately, none of the individuals within the present sample were found to have the less frequently occurring alleles. In the present sample of male caregivers, allelic variation in MAOA-uVNTR is also related to lipid levels and anger expression, but not body mass index (60). Similar to the current results, MAOA-uVNTR alleles associated with decreased activity were positively related to anger expression and lipid levels, suggesting the potential pleiotropic effect of this gene.
In sum, the present findings suggest that decreased transcriptional activity of the MAOA-uVNTR genotype is associated with adverse health outcomes. Specifically, individuals with less active MAOA-uVNTR alleles may be at increased risk for symptoms of depression, in particular, somatic symptoms, and poor sleep quality.
| NOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received for publication November 20, 2006; revision received March 23, 2007.
DOI:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31806d040b
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |