Psychosomatic Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Published online before print December 24, 2007, 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815c1b85
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaccarino, V.
Right arrow Articles by Merz, C. N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaccarino, V.
Right arrow Articles by Merz, C. N. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Coronary Artery Disease
Psychosomatic Medicine 70:40-48 (2008)
© 2008 American Psychosomatic Society


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Depression, the Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Risk

Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD, Candace McClure, BS, B. Delia Johnson, PhD, David S. Sheps, MD, MSPH, Vera Bittner, MD, MSPH, Thomas Rutledge, PhD, Leslee J. Shaw, PhD, George Sopko, MD, Marian B. Olson, MS, David S. Krantz, PhD, Susmita Parashar, MD, MPH, Oscar C. Marroquin, MD and C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD

From the Division of Cardiology (V.V., L.J.S.), and the Division of General Medicine (S.P.), Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; the Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (B.D.J., C.M.C., M.B.O.); the Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (O.C.M.); the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (D.S.S.); the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama (V.B.); the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California (T.R.); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland (G.S.); the Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (D.S.K.); and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (C.N.B.M.).

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Viola Vaccarino, MD, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 1256 Briarcliff Road NE, Suite-1 North, Atlanta, GA 30306. E-mail: viola.vaccarino{at}emory.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Background: The relationship between depression and the metabolic syndrome is unclear, and whether metabolic syndrome explains the association between depression and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is unknown.

Methods: We studied 652 women who received coronary angiography as part of the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study and completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Women who had both elevated depressive symptoms (BDI ≥10) and a previous diagnosis of depression were considered at highest risk, whereas those with one of the two conditions represented an intermediate group. The metabolic syndrome was defined according to the ATP-III criteria. The main outcome was incidence of adverse CVD events (hospitalizations for myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, and CVD-related mortality) over a median follow-up of 5.9 years.

Results: After adjusting for demographic factors, lifestyle and functional status, both depression categories were associated with about 60% increased odds for metabolic syndrome compared with no depression (p = .03). The number of metabolic syndrome risk factors increased gradually across the three depression categories (p = .003). During follow-up, 104 women (15.9%) experienced CVD events. In multivariable analysis, women with both elevated symptoms and a previous diagnosis of depression had 2.6 times higher risk of CVD. When metabolic syndrome was added to the model, the risk associated with depression only decreased by 7%, and both depression and metabolic syndrome remained significant predictors of CVD.

Conclusions: In women with suspected coronary artery disease, the metabolic syndrome is independently associated with depression but explains only a small portion of the association between depression and incident CVD.

Key Words: depression • cardiovascular disease • women • metabolic syndrome • obesity

Abbreviations: BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; CAD = coronary artery disease; CVD = cardiovascular disease; DASI = Duke Activity Status Inventory; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; WISE = Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation; NHLBI = National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Depression is common in the general population (1) and in cardiac patients (2,3), particularly among women (1,4,5). Observational studies have provided strong evidence that depression is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or total mortality, both among individuals initially free of CVD (6), and in cardiac patients (7). The mechanisms underlying these effects, however, are still debated (8).

Recently, depression has been linked to the metabolic syndrome (9–12), a growing problem in the United States and an important risk factor for CVD and all-cause mortality (13,14). The reasons for this association may reside in the unhealthy lifestyles of persons with depression, and/or enduring dysregulation of the adrenocortical and autonomic nervous system, which may lead to increased visceral adiposity and insulin resistance (15,16). If the relationship between depression and the metabolic syndrome is confirmed, the latter may well play a role in the increased CVD risk associated with depression. However, depression and the metabolic syndrome have not been consistently linked to each other, with a recent study failing to demonstrate such an association (17). Furthermore, no previous study has addressed the question of whether the metabolic syndrome, entirely or in part, accounts for the observed connection between depression and CVD.

In this study we explored the role played by the metabolic syndrome in the relationship between depression and incident CVD in women with suspected myocardial ischemia, a group with significant psychosocial burden (4). Our key aims were a) to clarify whether the metabolic syndrome and its various components are associated with depression, independent of demographic and lifestyle factors; and b) to investigate to what extent the metabolic syndrome explains the effect of depression on incidence of CVD events over a median follow-up of 5.9 years.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Study Sample and General Procedures
The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) is a multicenter study sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) for the study of ischemic heart disease in women. Details of the WISE design and methods have been published (18). Briefly, between 1996 and 2000, 936 women with chest discomfort, suspected myocardial ischemia, or both were enrolled at the time of referral for clinically indicated coronary angiography. Exclusion criteria included emergency referral, major comorbidity compromising follow-up, pregnancy, contraindication to provocative diagnostic testing, cardiomyopathy, severe heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or unstable angina within 1 month before study entry, coronary revascularization procedures within 6 months before study entry, significant valvular or congenital heart disease, language barrier, and any condition likely to affect study retention (alcoholism, drug abuse, or severe psychiatric illness). The WISE study received institutional review board approval from each participating site and all participants provided informed consent. All enrolled patients received a baseline evaluation that included collection of demographic information, medical history, medication use, symptom and psychosocial evaluation, a physical examination with blood pressure and physical measurements, and a fasting blood draw for the measurement of lipids and glucose.

The WISE lipid core laboratory was enrolled in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lipid standardization program previously used in multiple NHLBI-sponsored lipid-lowering intervention trials. The coefficients of variation for total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were 1.80%, 1.23%, and 3.93%, respectively. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was obtained using the Friedewald formula (19). The Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance index was calculated from fasting glucose and insulin values (20).

Waist circumference was measured at the umbilicus. Functional capacity was assessed by means of the Duke Activity Status Inventory (DASI), a validated 12-item questionnaire which correlates with exercise treadmill results (21) and is a strong prognostic indicator (22). Physical activity was evaluated with the Postmenopausal Estrogen-Progestin Intervention questionnaire, a self-reported estimate of average physical activity level at home, work, and leisure (23). In addition, all medications taken within the last week, including antidepressants, were recorded and classified into major medication classes.

Measurement of Depression
Recruitment in WISE preceded the administration of the psychological questionnaire by about 4 months, therefore psychological data were not available in early participants. As part of the psychosocial battery, participants completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), a self-administered validated 21-item scale of depressive symptoms which was shown to predict cardiovascular outcomes in many studies (24–26). The BDI provides a continuous score of depressive symptoms ranging from 0 to 63, and a score ≥10 indicates at least moderate symptoms of depression (27). A lifetime history of major depressive disorder was not formally assessed, but participants were asked whether they had a previous diagnosis of depression requiring treatment. This question did not query the type or duration of the treatment. After previous work in WISE (28), information on depressive symptoms and self-reported treatment history of depression was used to classify women into three groups of increasing depression severity. Women with both elevated symptoms of depression (BDI ≥10) and a reported previous diagnosis of depression were considered the most severe or longstanding cases of depression, presumably including many cases of major depressive disorder. This group was previously shown to exhibit a remarkably higher risk of death and cardiac events compared with women with none or only one of these two depression indicators (28). Those with either BDI ≥10 or a previous diagnosis of depression, but not both, represented an intermediate group; and women with neither condition were considered nondepressed.

Assessment of Metabolic Syndrome
We used the ATP-III criteria, recently revised by the American Heart Association and the NHLBI (29), to classify women as being with or without the metabolic syndrome on the basis of the presence or absence of three or more of the following factors: a) waist circumference >88 cm; b) fasting triglycerides ≥150 mg/dl or taking lipid-lowering medications; c) HDL cholesterol <50 mg/dl or taking lipid-lowering medications; d) systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg, or diastolic blood pressure ≥85 mm Hg, or use of antihypertensive drug therapy; and e) fasting glucose ≥100 mg/dl or taking antidiabetic drugs. In addition to classifying women based on diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, we calculated a score counting the number of metabolic syndrome risk factors, ranging from 0 to 5.

Assessment of Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease
Quantitative analysis of coronary angiograms was performed off-line at the WISE Angiographic Core Laboratory (Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI) by investigators blinded to all other subject data (30). Luminal diameter was measured at all stenoses and at nearby reference segments using an electronic cine projector-based "cross-hair" technique (Vanguard Instrument Corporation, Melville, NY). The presence of one or more stenoses ≥50% in diameter was classified as "obstructive" coronary artery disease (CAD). A CAD severity score was also developed by assigning increasing points to increasing percent stenosis (0–19, 20–49, 50–69, 70–89, 90–98, 99–100), after adjusting for presence of collaterals. Lesion location was taken into account in the scoring, with more proximal lesions receiving higher weighting.

Ascertainment of Cardiovascular Events
Follow-up for the occurrence of CVD events was obtained by telephone interview at 6-weeks and then yearly thereafter. Using a scripted interview, an experienced nurse or physician queried each patient for the occurrence of hospitalizations and the reason for hospitalization. The main outcome of interest was a composite end point of major cardiovascular events, including death due to CVD or hospitalizations for nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or congestive heart failure (ICD-9 codes 390–459). In the event of death, a death certificate was obtained and causes of death were adjudicated by WISE investigators blinded to other study data. In case of disagreement, a consensus and final adjudication were obtained by the Steering Committee. The median length of follow-up was 5.9 years (interquartile range 3.6–6.9 years).

Statistical Analysis
First, we performed a descriptive comparison of baseline factors according to depression status. Because some variables (body mass index, waist circumference, physical activity score, functional capacity score, lipid and glucose levels) were not normally distributed, the median value, rather than the mean, was calculated according to BDI groups, and the p value for trend was obtained using nonparametric tests. To calculate trend statistics, we used the Mantel-Haenszel test for categorical data, and the Jonckheere-Terpstra method for continuous data (31).

Next, logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between the depression group and metabolic syndrome, and odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for metabolic syndrome according to depression status were obtained after adjusting for other factors. In separate steps, models were adjusted for demographic factors (age, race, education, and marital status), behavioral and functional status variables (current and past smoking, physical activity, and functional capacity measured with the DASI), and beta blocker use. To examine the association between depression and individual components of the metabolic syndrome, we conducted a similar series of logistic regression models in which each component was the dependent variable. We also constructed cumulative logit regression models for ordered categories to examine the relationship between depression and number of metabolic syndrome risk factors as an ordinal variable ranging from 0 to 5. Additional analyses were conducted with BDI as a continuous variable.

The individual and joint association of depression and metabolic syndrome with incident CVD events was tested using Cox proportional hazards models. Modeling was conducted in subsequent steps: a) adjusting for demographic factors (age, race, education, and marital status); b) adding behavioral variables (smoking and physical activity), functional capacity, and use of beta blockers; c) adding the CAD severity score; and, finally, d) adding metabolic syndrome, to determine whether the latter modulated the association between depression and outcome. We also examined whether the addition of number of metabolic syndrome risk factors, rather than metabolic syndrome, would provide similar results. The proportional hazards assumption of invariant hazards ratio over the follow-up was tested and found to be satisfied.

Because persons may become depressed as a consequence of a diagnosis of coronary heart disease, we repeated the analyses after excluding women with a previous history of coronary heart disease, defined as history of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery, or with a previous history of diagnosed diabetes. All analyses were conducted using SAS software, version 9 (Cary, NC), and all tests for statistical significance were 2-tailed.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 936 women were enrolled in WISE. Of this group, 283 women were excluded because information on BDI was not obtained, and an additional two women were excluded because of missing depression diagnosis information, leaving 652 women available for analysis. Ten additional women had missing follow-up data and were excluded from the analyses of CVD events. Women without depression information were significantly less likely to be white (75% versus 84%), had more severe CAD on angiogram (severity score 9.25 versus 7.50), and were slightly more likely to meet the metabolic syndrome criteria (67% versus 60%).

A comparison of baseline characteristics according to depression group (Table 1) showed that women with an elevated BDI score or a previous depression diagnosis were younger, less educated, and less likely to be married. They were also less physically active, had lower functional capacity and were more likely to smoke. However, presence and severity of CAD based on angiographic results did not differ by depression status. Menopausal status was not related to depression, but depressed women were more likely to use hormone replacement therapy.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Sample Characteristics According to Depression Status

 

Depression and Metabolic Syndrome
Of the metabolic syndrome risk factors, triglyceride levels and waist circumference were those most strongly associated with depression, showing a graded association with respect to depression severity group (Table 1). Except glucose, all the metabolic syndrome risk factors tended to be more common in women with depression (Figure 1). As a result, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was higher in women with either elevated BDI or a previous depression diagnosis (66.7%), or both (63.3%), compared with women with no depression (53.4%, p < .001; test for trend: p = .01). The number of metabolic syndrome risk factors meeting the ATP-III criteria increased progressively across the depression severity groups, 2.7, 3.0, and 3.1, respectively (p = .003).


Figure 17
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Unadjusted association of depression category with the metabolic syndrome and its individual risk factor components.

 

In logistic regression models, after adjusting for demographic factors, both depression categories were associated with about 80% increased odds for metabolic syndrome compared with no depression (Table 2). The association was slightly weakened, to about 60%, by further adjusting for smoking, physical activity, functional capacity (DASI scores), and use of beta blockers. Depression category was also associated, in a graded fashion, with number of metabolic syndrome risk factors. After adjusting for all the variables mentioned above, having both elevated BDI scores and a previous depression diagnosis increases the odds of having one additional metabolic syndrome risk factor by 58% when compared with those with no depression (p = .04). Depressive symptoms were associated with metabolic syndrome also as a continuous variable: in logistic regression models adjusted for all the variables above, for each 5-point increase in BDI score the odds of metabolic syndrome increased 20% (p = .002). In contrast, a previous depression diagnosis, without consideration of BDI score level, was not associated with metabolic syndrome: odds ratio = 1.00, p = .99.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Relationship Between Depression Group, Metabolic Syndrome, and Number of Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors

 

When subjects with a history of CAD were excluded, the associations were somewhat stronger (Table 2): in multivariable analysis, women with both elevated BDI scores and a previous depression diagnosis had greater than twice the odds of metabolic syndrome compared with nondepressed women (p < .001).

Depression was a stronger predictor of the metabolic syndrome as a whole, rather than of separate metabolic syndrome risk factors. When metabolic syndrome risk factor criteria were examined individually in adjusted models as above, only hypertension (p = .04) and elevated triglycerides (p = .03) were significantly more common in depressed women, although other factors showed borderline associations.

Depression, Metabolic Syndrome, and Incident Cardiovascular Disease
During the 5.9 years of follow-up, there were 104 outcome events, including 31 CVD deaths and 73 nonfatal CVD events. After adjusting for demographic factors, women with both elevated BDI and a previous depression diagnosis had almost two times higher risk of CVD compared with women without depression (Table 3). After further adjusting for behavioral factors, functional capacity, use of beta blockers and CAD severity, the association was minimally reduced. In contrast, the intermediate depression category was not significantly associated with CVD incidence. As shown in Table 3, metabolic syndrome was also strongly related to incident CVD. Once the metabolic syndrome was added to the model, the risk associated with depression decreased by 7%, and both depression and metabolic syndrome remained significant predictors of CVD. When number of metabolic syndrome risk factors was added to the model, in place of metabolic syndrome, the results were almost identical and are not shown. Addition of antidepressant use in the past week to the final model also did not materially change the study estimates. The BDI score as a continuous variable was also significantly associated with CVD: for each 5-points increase in BDI, CVD risk increased 17% (p = .004). However, after adjustment for other risk factors the estimate became 8% (p = .25). A previous depression diagnosis was associated with CVD risk (adjusted hazards ratio = 1.87, p = .04).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Relationship Between Depression Group, Metabolic Syndrome and CVD Incidence in the Entire Sample

 

Again, exclusion of women with previous CAD strengthened the associations providing a larger relative risk (Table 4). Women with both elevated BDI and a previous depression diagnosis had more than four times higher risk of CVD compared with nondepressed women (p = .004), and addition of the metabolic syndrome had, again, a modest effect, weakening the association by only 7%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 4. Relationship Between Depression Group, Metabolic Syndrome and CVD Incidence Among Women Without a History of Previous Coronary Heart Disease

 


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Although a connection between depression and metabolic syndrome has been suspected for some time, no previous studies have addressed whether, and to what extent, metabolic syndrome is an important mediator in the relationship between depression and CVD. In a cohort of women with suspected CAD, we report a strong association between depression and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome, independent of demographic factors, lifestyle, and functional status. Women with depression had approximately 80% higher odds of having the metabolic syndrome compared with nondepressed women; this estimate decreased to approximately 60% after adjusting for lifestyle factors, functional status, and use of beta blockers. In addition, the number of metabolic syndrome risk factors increased gradually across the three categories of increasing depression severity. However, the metabolic syndrome only explained a small portion, 20%, of the association between depression and incident CVD.

A relationship between major depression and the metabolic syndrome has been examined in three previous studies (9,10,17). Among young adults (<40 years of age) in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was approximately twice as high in women with a history of major depressive episode compared with women without (9). This association was not explained by demographic and behavioral factors, including age, race, education, smoking history, physical activity, and carbohydrate and alcohol consumption. No such relationship was found in men, suggesting that women may be especially susceptible to metabolic derangements secondary to depression. Similarly, in a sample of middle-aged women, depressive symptoms and metabolic syndrome were significantly correlated, but the results were unadjusted for demographic and lifestyle factors (10). In contrast, a recent study in a young Finnish sample failed to find an association between depression and metabolic syndrome (17). This study, however, did not examine women separately from men.

When metabolic syndrome risk factors were examined separately, only hypertension and elevated triglycerides were significantly associated with depression in multivariable analysis. However, the number of risk factors went up with increasing depression category, therefore supporting the usefulness of their combination as a cluster under the definition of metabolic syndrome in this study.

In this study, we used a classification of depression that incorporated both treatment history and current levels of depressive symptoms. As reported before (28), the combination of these two depression markers was a powerful predictor of subsequent CVD, and a more robust risk indicator than just the BDI score or treatment history alone. Women with both factors likely include those with more severe, persistent, or recurrent depression. Previous studies have shown that women with a recurrent history of major depression have a higher risk of carotid plaque (32) and coronary and aortic calcification (33) compared with women with a single episode of depression or no history, suggesting that exposure to multiple episodes of depression may be particularly detrimental for women's cardiovascular health.

Potential Mechanisms
It is well known that depressed individuals tend to follow unhealthy lifestyles such as smoking, sedentary behavior, unhealthy diet, and poor compliance with medical treatments (34,35). However in our study, as in the report by Kinder et al. (9), the association remained strong after adjusting for behavioral factors, suggesting that the latter play only a minor role.

Depression has been associated with physiological abnormalities that may have metabolic consequences, including hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity and autonomic nervous system dysfunction (36). These same abnormalities have been linked to several, if not all, of the components of the metabolic syndrome (16,37,38), and psychosocial factors explain a large portion of the association between adrenal/autonomic disturbances and the metabolic syndrome (16).

Despite numerous plausible mechanisms, our study cannot determine whether depression is a cause, a consequence, or simply a marker of the metabolic syndrome. For example, physical limitations or social stigma caused by obesity may predispose to depression, however, our study adjusted for functional capacity. Emotional problems in obese persons may also be secondary to excess cytokine production, which may have a role in the etiology of depression (39). Nonetheless, the strong association found and the dose-response pattern, with increasing levels of depressive symptoms, suggest a causal relationship. Whatever the predominant direction, it is important to recognize that behavioral/emotional problems and the metabolic syndrome are interconnected and may enhance each other in a feed-forward pattern. For example, in a longitudinal study of women, depression, tension, and anger at baseline predicted the development of the metabolic syndrome during the follow-up, but having the metabolic syndrome at baseline also predicted increasing anger and anxiety in the following years (10).

Relation to Cardiovascular Risk
In view of our prospective design we were able to evaluate, for the first time, the relative importance of depression and metabolic syndrome on CVD risk. We found that only 20% of the CVD risk associated with depression was explained by the metabolic syndrome. Once depression and metabolic syndrome were both included in the same model, they both remained independent predictors of CVD. Given the prognostic role of the metabolic syndrome (13,14), and its strong association with depression in this study, it is somewhat surprising that it explained only a small fraction of the increased CVD risk associated with depression. On the other hand, the link between depression and CVD is multifactorial (8). In addition to lifestyle and traditional CVD risk factors, evidence is mounting on the role of autonomic dysfunction, coagulation, and inflammation, which may provide a more direct pathophysiological link between depression and CVD (36,40).

Limitations
The WISE study included a selected sample of women referred for coronary angiography due to suspected coronary ischemia, which may limit generalizability. Nonetheless, this is a relevant patient group to study, given their high level of psychosocial distress and coronary risk factor burden, particularly metabolic syndrome risk factors. The psychosocial questionnaire was not available for the initial participants, limiting somewhat the sample size for analysis. In addition, women without depression information had more severe CAD and more metabolic syndrome risk factors than the remaining women had, suggesting that earlier participants had a higher risk status. Furthermore, we did not have information on major depression from a diagnostic interview, or on duration of depression. We also did not have information on type or duration of antidepressant treatments. However, our classification based on current depressive symptoms in conjunction with a previous diagnosis of depression requiring treatment should be a better approximation of major depressive disorder than a definition focusing only on current depressive symptoms. On the other hand, the multicenter design, the detailed collection of patient data, the core laboratory assessment of CVD risk factors, and CAD assessment with coronary angiography represent unique strengths of this study and add to the validity of our findings.


    CONCLUSIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
In women with suspected CAD, depression and the metabolic syndrome are associated with each other independent of lifestyle factors and functional status. Surprisingly, however, the metabolic syndrome only explains a small portion of the association between depression and incident CVD, suggesting that depression and metabolic syndrome increase CVD risk mostly through independent pathways. Although our findings highlight the importance of both depression and the metabolic syndrome as independent risk factors for CVD in women, they indicate the need for more research aimed at uncovering the complex mechanisms linking depression to CVD risk.


    NOTES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 
Received for publication April 18, 2007; revision received July 30, 2007.

This work was supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes, nos. N01-HV-68161, N01-HV-68162, N01-HV-68163, N01-HV-68164; Grants K24HL077506, R01-HL68630, and R01 AG026255 (to V.V.); a GCRC Grant M01-RR00425 from the National Center for Research Resources; and Grants from the Gustavus and Louis Pfeiffer Research Foundation, The Women's Guild, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and the Ladies Hospital Aid Society of Western Pennsylvania, and QMED, Inc.

DOI:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31815c1b85


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 CONCLUSIONS
 NOTES
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:1097–106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Glassman AH, Shapiro PA. Depression and the course of coronary artery disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:4–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rumsfeld JS, Ho PM. Depression and cardiovascular disease: a call for recognition. Circulation 2005;111:250–3.[Free Full Text]
  4. Naqvi TZ, Naqvi SSA, Merz CNB. Gender differences in the link between depression and cardiovascular disease. Psychosom Med 2005;67:S15–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mallik S, Spertus JA, Reid KJ, Krumholz HM, Rumsfeld JS, Weintraub WS, Agarwal P, Santra M, Bidyasar S, Lichtman J, Wenger NK, Vaccarino V. Depressive symptoms after acute myocardial infarction: evidence for highest rates in younger women. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:876–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wulsin LR, Singal BM. Do depressive symptoms increase the risk for the onset of coronary disease? A systematic quantitative review. Psychosom Med 2003;65:201–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Barth J, Schumacher M, Herrmann-Lingen C. Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med 2004;66:802–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lett HS, Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Sherwood A, Strauman T, Robins C, Newman MF. Depression as a risk factor for coronary artery disease: evidence, mechanisms, and treatment. Psychosom Med 2004;66:305–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kinder LS, Carnethon MR, Palaniappan LP, King AC, Fortmann SP. Depression and the metabolic syndrome in young adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Psychosom Med 2004;66:316–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Raikkonen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. The relationship between psychological risk attributes and the metabolic syndrome in healthy women: antecedent or consequence? Metabolism 2002;51:1573–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Everson-Rose SA, Meyer PM, Powell LH, Pandey D, Torrens JI, Kravitz HM, Bromberger JT, Matthews KA. Depressive symptoms, insulin resistance, and risk of diabetes in women at midlife. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2856–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McCaffery JM, Niaura R, Todaro JF, Swan GE, Carmelli D. Depressive symptoms and metabolic risk in adult male twins enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Twin Study. Psychosom Med 2003;65:490–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA 2002;288:2709–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Malik S, Wong ND, Franklin SS, Kamath TV, L'Italien GJ, Pio JR, Williams GR. Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults. Circulation 2004;110:1245–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Chrousos GP. The role of stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome: neuro-endocrine and target tissue-related causes. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000;24:S50–5.[CrossRef]
  16. Brunner EJ, Hemingway H, Walker BR, Page M, Clarke P, Juneja M, Shipley MJ, Kumari M, Andrew R, Seckl JR, Papadopoulos A, Checkley S, Rumley A, Lowe GDO, Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG. Adrenocortical, autonomic, and inflammatory causes of the metabolic syndrome: nested case-control study. Circulation 2002;106:2659–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Herva A, Rasanen P, Miettunen J, Timonen M, Laksy K, Veijola J, Laitinen J, Ruokonen A, Joukamaa M. Co-occurrence of metabolic syndrome with depression and anxiety in young adults: the Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort Study. Psychosom Med 2006;68:213–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Bairey Merz CN, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, Reichek N, Reis SE, Rogers WJ, Sharaf BL, Sopko G. The Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: protocol design, methodology, and feasibility report. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1453–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Friedwald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without the use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499–502.[Abstract]
  20. Hanley AJ, Williams K, Stern MP, Haffner SM. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance in relation to the incidence of cardiovascular disease: the San Antonio Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1177–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol 1989;64:651–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Wessel TR, Arant CB, Olson MB, Johnson BD, Reis SE, Sharaf BL, Shaw LJ, Handberg E, Sopko G, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, Bairey Merz CN. Relationship of physical fitness vs body mass index with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events in women. JAMA 2004;292:1179–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. The Writing Group for the PEPI trial. Effects of hormone therapy on bone mineral density: results from the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions (PEPI) trial. The Writing Group for the PEPI. JAMA 1996;276:1389–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Carney RM, Rich MW, Tevelde A, Saini J, Clark K, Jaffe AS. Major depressive disorder in coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:1273–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M. Depression and 18-month prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1995;91:999–1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ahern DK, Gorkin L, Anderson JL, Tierney C, Hallstrom A, Ewart C, Capone RJ, Schron E, Kornfeld D, Herd JA, Richardson DW, Follick MJ. Biobehavioral variables and mortality or cardiac arrest in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS). Am J Cardiol 1990;66:59–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Beck AT, Steer RA. Beck Depression Inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Hartcourt-Brace-Jovanovich; 1987.
  28. Rutledge T, Reis SE, Olson MB, Owens J, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, Mankad S, Rogers WJ, Merz CN, Sopko G, Cornell CE, Sharaf B, Matthews KA, Vaccarino V. Depression symptom severity and reported treatment history in the prediction of cardiac risk in women with suspected myocardial ischemia: the NHLBI-sponsored WISE study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:874–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, Franklin BA, Gordon DJ, Krauss RM, Savage PJ, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Costa F. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation 2005;112:2735–52.[Free Full Text]
  30. Sharaf BL, Pepine CJ, Kerensky RA, Reis SE, Reichek N, Rogers WJ, Sopko G, Kelsey SF, Holubkov R, Olson M, Miele NJ, Williams DO, Bairey Merz CN. Detailed angiographic analysis of women with suspected ischemic chest pain (pilot phase data from the NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE] study angiographic core laboratory). Am J Cardiol 2001;87:937–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1973.
  32. Jones DJ, Bromberger JT, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Matthews KA. Lifetime history of depression and carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged women. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:153–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Agatisa PK, Matthews KA, Bromberger JT, Edmundowicz D, Chang YF, Sutton-Tyrrell K. Coronary and aortic calcification in women with a history of major depression. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1229–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Glassman AH, Helzer JE, Covey LS, Cottler LB, Stetner F, Tipp JE, Johnson J. Smoking, smoking cessation and major depression. JAMA 1990;264:1546–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Zigelstein RC, Bush DE, Fauerbach JA. Depression, adherence behavior, and coronary disease outcomes. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:808–9.[Free Full Text]
  36. Carney RM, Freedland KE, Veith RC. Depression, the autonomic nervous system, and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med 2005;67:S29–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Reaven GM, Lithell H, Landsberg L. Hypertension and associated metabolic abnormalities: the role of insulin resistance and the sympathoadrenal system. N Engl J Med 1996;334:374–81.[Free Full Text]
  38. Raikkonen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. Anthropometric and psychosocial determinants of visceral obesity in healthy postmenopausal women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1999;23:775–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Raison CL, Capuron L, Miller AH. Cytokines sing the blues: inflammation and the pathogenesis of depression. Trends Immunol 2006;27:24–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Tsetsekou E, Papageorgiou C, Christodoulou G, Stefanadis C. Inflammation, coagulation, and depressive symptomatology in cardiovascular disease-free people; the ATTICA study. Eur Heart J 2004;25:492–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Geriatr Psychiatry NeurolHome page
A. Laudisio, E. Marzetti, F. Pagano, G. Pozzi, R. Bernabei, and G. Zuccala
Depressive Symptoms and Metabolic Syndrome: Selective Association in Older Women
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, December 1, 2009; 22(4): 215 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
E. M. Goldbacher, J. Bromberger, and K. A. Matthews
Lifetime History of Major Depression Predicts the Development of the Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Women
Psychosom Med, April 1, 2009; 71(3): 266 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Hamer, G. J. Molloy, and E. Stamatakis
Psychological distress as a risk factor for cardiovascular events: pathophysiological and behavioral mechanisms.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 16, 2008; 52(25): 2156 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vaccarino, V.
Right arrow Articles by Merz, C. N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vaccarino, V.
Right arrow Articles by Merz, C. N. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Depression
Right arrow Coronary Artery Disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS